xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
This planning needs to be properly evalusted in this Green Belt.

tony philipson, Weybridge

Philip Brown, Weybridge
There are plenty of other sites in the area eg Lyne where the incinerator could be located

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

David Wynn-Jones, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Edmund Hodgeon, Weybridge
Over our dead bodies. Many places to build this on old industrial sites in the UK. This has to be a scheme to downgrade the planning to be able to build houses and the council is going to fall right for it. Please council do not be duped by these people pretending they want to be environmentally friendly. It is a con!!!!

Ms Johnson, Cobham
Keep our Green Belt protected

xxxxxxxx, Windlesham
What a nightmare, 20 tonne HGVs on minor roads. More traffic chaos and more air pollution.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, WEYBRIDGE

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Health and safety issues, wildlife issues, green belt- easy decision NO to the incinerator. Green Belt laws must be enforced by the County.

Reg Heath, Weybridge

Alice Duff,

Thelma Ager, Hullbridge, Essex
Why polute the air around Hampton Court, Wisley and Cobham when there are other brown field sites further away from popular visited areas.

Louise Gomez, Rochford

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I cannot believe that this project should have been allowed to come this far! This is a populated residential area with many people leaving more polluted areas closer to London to enjoy better quality of life, including clean air. This project will destroy the area with respect to air quality, traffic and as a result noise. This cannot be allowed to proceed!

Lulu Appleton, Cobham,

Michael Appleton, Cobham, Surrey

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Lets protect our greenbelt!

Ilya Katsnelson,

Lucy Hayward, Weybridge
I have serious concerns about health issues, an increase in traffic in an already congested traffic blackspot, the environmental impact and the erosion of green belt land arising in connnection with the proposed incinerator.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Has anyone considered the effect on the numerous schools in the area? Long term consequences on council and the owners of the incinerators? Has the council learnt nothing from the past?

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybrudge

xxxxxxxx, hersham
350 children at school less than 1 mile away - does the council really want to battle legal issues for years to come - this is a potential health issue for these children and their families

Peter Morley,

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Amanda Kesterton, Weybridge
I believe this development will prove to be an irresponsible development and devastating to all life in its near vicinity.

Mr D.A.SHARPE, Weybridge

Terry Williams, Walton on Thames
Detrimental effect on childrens health.Building on green belt.Danger from large lorries.Completely unsuitable in an area of natural beauty.Traffic congestion.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Leeve this area alone please

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I oppose the planning application

Barbara Wardle, Hersham

R.A.Dawes,

Alicia Harris, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Ian/ Plumb, Walton on Thames
It sounds like anothe cockied idea forom this govenment and I hope the petittion will presuade them to another of their U turns.

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Why has our MP not said anything yet! Typical.

Eleanor Mrgan Bearne, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Woking
I called SCC to complain about the lack of tranparency about this planning application and the fact that there plenty of Brownfield sites in other locations far away from the residential mass that is surrounding this proposed site. SCC seemed more concerned in stonewalling me. As a result of which I am insensed by their attitude. This would be a disaster for the whole area and a reckless and irrisponsible act on the part of SCC if it is allowed to go ahead. It must be popposed by everyone who resides in the surrounding area and countryside (Green Belt)

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Thanks for being so open about this SCC...not. This whole things sums you up really - bravo and well done for your excellent guardianship of this part of Surrey. Anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together can see how impractical this area is in regards to already high traffic, due to an industrial estate at Brooklands, and the number of people living here.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Tames

Coral Laird, Weybridge
Signing to save the local environment.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
Save our green belt

sarah brown, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
No thank you !

Simon Kay, Walton On Thames

Jason Marcus McCabe, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Jenny Dalton,

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames
Inappropriate development in the wrong place

Kevin Holding,

Robert James,

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This a health hazzard to everyone in the area and a disgusting way to use green belt land in surrey

Sandi Beaumont, Weybridge
This greenbelt area features high residency, is one of natural beauty featuring a large wood, riding centre, and golf club, a purpose built Care home residency and the local council, for profit, want to destroy this area by putting a totally unnecessary incinerator. there are heaps of brown belt / industrial areas where this could be situated. Think again, Elmbridge, This is a totally unsuitable site.

V. Murphy, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, esher

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Peter Jenner, Byfleet
This will increase pollution and disruption to residents We must protect our green belt

xxxxxxxx, Derry City
A health hazzard to everyone in the surrounding area and a disgusting misuse of green belt land in Surrey. Plenty of alternative Brown sites readily available for this scheme. This has to be the proper option, Use up existing brown field sites. Please do not let these fools rob our country of evermore green land sites. We have to balance and redress decades of infastructure damage and unused brown field sites. left as eyesores dotted around our country. Greenbelt land should never be wasted in such a manner as in the past. Thank Again!!!!!

J P Murphy, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
NO BIOMASS INCINERATOR!!! This is Green Belt Land!

Paul Merry,

Nick Taylor,
Surely a more remote site should be considered away from established communities? The Council's analysis of sites should be reviewed carefully.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Ian Picken, GODALMING

xxxxxxxx, Weybrige

EDWARD Sharp, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This area has numerous schools, congested roads and a substantial population. It is completely wrong to pollute the air further - surely the effects of aircraft, commuting and the M25 is enough....

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Jackie Sharp,

Celia Gregory, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Please consider the health and safety issues for children and their families relating to such development of the area. Our greenbelt areas should also be protected.

brian eastwood, walton on thames

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Must protect the green belt.

Paul Abbott, Byfleet
I am fully opposed to this project. Spend some time in the area and look at the current traffic problem. This will add to the problem and add other pollution, despite claims to the contrary. NO NO NO NO!

Richard Starr, Esher

Anna McGuinness, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher
This is not really an issue of whether Cobham itself is an appropriate place for such an incinerator, as they should not be built anywhere. The idea of zero emissions is nonsense - there will be a lot of Carbon Dioxide emitted, and it will be impossible to scrub all Dioxins from the emissions too. It is really hard to understand what Elmbridge Council are thinking here, unless it is a planning ploy as suggested by another signatory.

anna craig-wood, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Paulina McGroarty, Esher

xxxxxxxx,

simon soutar, weybridge

Ingrid O\'Leary, Byfleet Surrey

xxxxxxxx, ESHER

xxxxxxxx, East Molesey

marc o\'leary, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, East Molesey
Not on my own doostep but clearly unjustified development within the precious Surrey green belt

Daniel Talenejad, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is a ridiculous idea

Mrs A Mutafyan,

xxxxxxxx, surbiton
I have 4 grandchildren living in the area

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton
Byfleet Road is normally a dangerous traffic nightmare already and relief road for the M25 when that is closed, without adding constant new large waste vehicles, and outside of any ecological concerns for the population of the area due to the nature of the proposed site.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on thames
I live very near this, there are many schools nearby, riding stables, and loads of wildlife, all to be killed because of this. Do not ruin our community for something dangerous, there are many towns, and social activities, that will soon be put to harm because of this. NO please DO NOT make this horrible device

Karen Seymour, Oxshott

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Robert Shatwell, Woking

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Green Belt, health hazard, massive congestion issues, school less than a mile away. How many more reasons do you need to realise this is not suitable land.

D.L. Wilson, Weybridge

Jeremy Bates, Oxshott

Janine Ganter, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Roz Williams, BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Wrong project at the wrong place.

Dr Anne Appleton,

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
I agree with the letter

val humphreys,

Tim Ransley,

D.Bandari, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Kim Pang, Oxshott

Catherine Fowler, Weybridge
The impact of such a development on air quality and already severe traffic congestion in the area would be horrible. This is a very built-up area and a gasification incinerator would adversely affect the quality of life of many, many locals.

W N Fowler, Weybridge
The air quality is already dangerously poor in this area. The incinerator will only make it worst.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Helen Lawry, Weybridge

Julia Lofthouse, Esher

xxxxxxxx, London

Keith Springall,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is anti-social irresponsible madness !,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Please Mr Councillor come to your senses!!

Kevin Gregory, Byfleet
Definately a NO. I want to Enjoy the wildlife and cleaner air here. There are other alternatives to Incineration.

Stuart Cole, Windlesham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames, Surrey

Julia Gilchist, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, West byfleet
Our children deserve better

Greg Downs,

Lisa Rowe,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Concerned about health issues from emission

Shlomo Dowen, Mansfield

Natalia Zenina, Weybridge
We can't believe they are going to spoil the best place in Surrey! Certainely there are a lot of places they could do it without so great harm. Just search around better!

Gwyneth Gomes, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Martin Young, Byfleet

Michelle Gomes,

Fiona Houghton, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Lower Kingswood
Unacceptable and harmful development in the green belt.

xxxxxxxx, Crawley

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Already very crowded roads leading to and from the A3 / M25, and too close to golf courses / horse riding areas.

Tatjana orlova, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Brigid Michael, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Joyce Jabamoney, Walton-on-Thames
Please consider the health issues and the impact on young children. Why the council is so keen to destroy an area of natural beauty?

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
xxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton
Absolutely wrong place. This is a green belt. Brown belt/industrial areas are obviously more appropriate. Roads not prepared for heavy traffic (HGVs).

Ian Gomes, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

Elizabeth Thompson, Byfleet

Lisa Shone, Cobham
We have 3 children and do not wish their health to be affected by breathing in toxic emissions

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
NO any gasification incinerators in our green belt area!

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Stop a new sourses of dioxins in Surrey!

Jonathan Brookes, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

Katie Weller, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Find a brown field site. Not an appropriate location at all. Traffic, health etc

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Natalie Herbert, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybride

GLORIA BOSQUE ESPALLARGAS, SURBITON

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

David Harvey, Weybridge

Elizabeth Vickery, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Planning permission was refused for a local school to expand onto a small strip of protected land. How can SCC possibly justify their actions if they go ahead and approve this application?

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

Lesley Dolphin, Byfleet

Sarah Rabett, Weybridge
This is a green belt area with many schools in the area so is not suitable for a waste incinerator.

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Elisa Everitt, Weybridge

Michael Tripp, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Naveeda Mitchell, Weybridge
This is a bit close to populated areas - there must be areas that are in the middle of farmland not used, for whatever reason where there is no housing and people living close by?

Mrs Debbie Trievnor, Weybridge
Yet another attack on Green Belt land and an unacceptable risk to public health. Just say no!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Too many risks

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone
Possibly the worst idea I have heard in a long time. Interesting to see they are building an old peoples home on the Redhilll Road - don't the old folk count any more?

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Hahahah I'd have loved to be a fly on the wall in the 30 second SCC meeting with the guy who proposed this. "We'd like to build an incinerator next to thousands of school children and among heritage sites and green belt. Now I know this may sound pretty unappealing.. BUT, wait till you hear this! It'll make all involved millions a year".

KAREN HIGGINS, Weybridge

DAVID HIGGINS, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Should be located away from any built up area, industrial site would be better and probably already have better access.

Lucy Sadler, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Waltonn on Thames

leslie burrage, Burwood Park
Protect our Green Belt and the health of our children by resiting in less populated area. The weight of extra traffic will only add to the serious congestion on local roads.
We dispair that the proposal has reached this far!!

Tom Culverwell, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
This area is congested enough and we have already had a motorway service station forced upon us. No thank you!

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, WEYBRIDGE

Steve Sampson, Cobham

Robert King, Weybridge

Kristian Eklo, Cobham

Sharron Eklo, Cobham

H Baker,

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, cobham

Diane Gray, addlestone
Make current sites more efficient. Incinuration should be last resort. Not first option!

xxxxxxxx,

Jane Chrysostomou,

xxxxxxxx, Stoke d\\'Abernon
Think of the children !

Olaf Eklo, Cobham
Not really thought trough by the politicans in relation to schools nearby, traffic in Brooklands Road and the environmental consequences.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

clive moore, weybridge

keith adams, Weybridge
No Incinerator Please

John G G Williams,

June Kay Retter, Weybridge

Tracie Sampson,

Ellen Eklo, Cobham
We have to look after our Green Belt. Please stop it!

Lindsay Bould, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
The infrastructure around this area cannot cope as it stands with the traffic problems that are already way beyond the areas capability, also Redhill Road is nearly an impossible junction at peak periods so no thought has gone into the traffic management. The effect on people and their families health could be horrendous. The argument that this is a green form of energy is yet again jumping on a band wagon of unproven going green policies (Wind turbines). If this is to go ahead as a council I hope you have enough money for the claims culture in ten - twenty years time.

sandra boutell, West Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher
There are plenty of other places to build this. It is dangerous in a heavily residential area.

Phil Golding, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, East Horsley,

xxxxxxxx, caterham

Judith Ratcliffe, Weybridge
We need to protect our Green belt and stop this and potential gravel and aggregates re-cycling plans for the weybridge area.

john Dewar, byfleet

nicola boutell, byfleet
I am opposed to this planning application

Thomas Luke Ransley, Weybridge
Keep the green belt!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Yasir Noorani, weybridge
no way , already a very heavy load of HGvs on the byfleet road , plus many other sites to built incinerator why choose a residential area.

David howell, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx,

Mrs Gay Bottrill, Byfleet
In addition to the relevant objects the increased road traffic in be unbearable and, in cases of an emergency, may well cause dangerous delays.

Earle Bottrill, Byfleet
iN ADDITION TO THE RELEVANT OBJECTIONS THE INCREASED ROAD TRAFFIC WILL CAUSE UNBEARABLE TIME WASTE AND FRUSTRATIONS AND POSSIBLY IN CASES OF AN EMERGENCY DANGEROUS AND POSSIBLY FATAL DELAYS.

jennifer parkin, byfleet
Too much traffic on our roads environmentally unfriendly and too near houses there must be somewhere where it is not so built up. The byfleet road has so much traffic it is madness to consider anymore. Are Elmbridge Borough Council being paid huge amounts of money for this because I cannot think if any other reason why they would consider this scheme.

Ian D. Maidment,

Janice Franks, WALTON-ON-THAMES
The location is completely unsuitable for such a venture - the additional traffic, both HGVs making deliveries, and from people travelling to the area will rely on small local roads, which are already under severe strain from the current traffic.

J Gorton,
Is there not enough pollution I this area from the motorways and the electricity pilons?!?!? What is going to be the impact on Wisley and painshill parks that are working so hard at conservation of plants etc

Stephen JOHN, WEYBRIDGE

Mike Paddonj, Weybridge

Louise Sandford, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, byfleet
Can't believe that this facility has to be built here - my children will be going to the school nearby.

Frank Horder, Weybridge

June Hall, Cobham
The material should be processed where produced, not moving it to green belt land with the consequential heavy lorry congestion and polution on populated minor roads.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
This type of activity cannot be classed as environmentally friendly and ought to be undertaken in an industrialised area rather than Green Belt. Additionally Byfleet Road (A245) is already overly busy with all of the trucks going to and coming from Brooklands. The added volume of traffic created by the incinerator could only exacerbate the problem.

Peter Jarvis,

Renate Heath, Weybridge

Paul Ivatts, Weybridge
I can't think of a more unsuitable site for this sort of activity, lets hope common sense prevails.

Torsten Alexander, Cobham

Dudley Heath, Weybridge
We already get lots of smoke from people burning garden rubbish because they do not want to pay for the Brown bins, which is extremely annoying on a hot summer's day when you have to shut your windows. Adding this incinerator is the final straw.

CLIVE NEWMAN, COBHAM
JUST LIKE THE DOWNSIDE M25 SERVICES - ANOTHER UNWANTED DEVELOPMENT THE AUTHORITIES ARE TRYING TO FOIST UPON US - OF NO PRACTICAL VALUE TO LOCAL RESIDENTS AND IN FACT JUST THE OPPOSITE - AN ENVIRONMENTAL NOOSE!

Martin Major, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
Unimaginable that this can be allowed so close to schools, homes and recreational facilities.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Mrs Harveen Dhillon, New Haw
I am against this incinerator.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Impact on healh, traffic and greenbelt. A project like this shows the inconsistencies with which the council treats our greenbelt.

xxxxxxxx, Surrey

Sophie Walker, Byfleet
Far to close to highly populated areas and places of beauty. The traffic is already very bad in the local area so adding to this will cause further stress on the infrastructure. I am sure there are other sites that could be utilised which would prevent less impact on the local environment and population.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Bori, Byfleet

Alan Hardman, Weybridge

Brigita Vaskelyte, Cobham

Kristina Chiganova, Cobham

Josie Precious, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Gary Street, Addlestone

Helen Russell, Weybridge
Let's not destroy the green belt and instead evaluate other options within the region. There must be other alternatives which would protect our green belt.

Samantha Wallis, WEST BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Ridiculous choice of site. Green belt must be protected.

Helen Golding,

AlanFreer, Byfleet
There is enough HGV traffic already in this area - NO MORE!!!!!!!!!!

Z Pinchbeck, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
These things are for industrial sites, not rural green belt.

Tracy Wright, cobham

Gary Jones, Byfleet
If it does go ahead, they should re open the RED HIll road entrance from the A3/M25 roundabout, thus reducing some of the traffic.

Patricia Jones, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Fetcham
Soot emitted by incomplete combustion of fossil fuel and biomass, increases the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease.

bonnie-charlotte parker, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I am totally disgusted that such an application can even be made and proposed to Surrey County Council. Independent research clearly shows that gassification emits toxins. There is no economic or ecological justification for such a plant on Redhill Road. It will not benefit the local economy and in fact will devastate the lives of thousands of people for years to come and will destroy communities and the flora and fauna of the Greenbelt area. Why not allow the construction of a detached house on the plot instead?

Ingrid massie, Gomshall

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

ALISON LEE, BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I am afraid this does look like the first move in a classic property development/planning scheme. Bad in itself, but with much worse future implications...

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Outrageous to propoose this in such a built up area

Simon England, Weybridge

James England, Walton on Thames

Judith Doyle, Cobham

Keith Alvey, Esher
I wish this objection the very, very best of luck.

Sonia Duggan, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Ian Woodthorpe, London

xxxxxxxx,
Clean air is clearly not a priority for this 'Green Belt'.

Did you know that the Silvermere Haven Pet Cemetary has recently erected a 6 metre additional incinerator tower without planning permission that the council have decided to 'turn a blind eye to'?

Now the incinerator a mile away.

Nothing surprises me.

Clean air and principle are clearly not a priority to the council.

In closing. Dont hold your breathe. But the likely outcome is that you will have to, the air will be so foul.

wade pollard, west byfleet
This is Green Belt and this biomass could be burnt, instead of coal, at existing power stations around the country such as Drax etc which are looking for more sources of this material

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
See "Closing of Redhill Road" from the A3 when Brooklands Commercial area was developed. Road unsuitable for heavy trucks. If we have to have these sites - why in high density areas?

Matthew Baxter, Weybridge
Cannot believe SCC is this dumb. There must be more to it, like and slightly less catastrophic option that we will agree to in order to make this one go away.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Simon connolly, West horsley

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Paul Barnes, Walton on Thames

Robert Evans, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton On Thames
I use this area all the time, shopping, golf, visiting freinds and family, etc, etc and find that it is busy enough without the threat of additional heavy goods vehicles and the impact it may have on my peace of life.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Ridiculous! The traffic on the Byfleet road is already ablsolute torture and this proposal would see more big lorries on this route. Apart from the health issues for families living locally, the idea of allowing delvelopement of green belt is outrageous.

xxxxxxxx,
Another location should be found for this. Redhill Rd/Byfleet Rd already too much traffic. Plus do not need added polution from an incinerator from an already heavily populated area.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is Green Belt!

xxxxxxxx, Weybrodge

Penny Hoskyn, West Byfleet
This must not be allowd. Green belt land, a populated residential area, increased traffic on already very busy roads and above all not safe with harmful emissions from vehicles and the Plant.

Claire HOath, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Mark Ashman, Cobham
The traffic congestion on the Byfleet rd already has a negative impact on those of us who live on or close to it. Approving the waste incinerator would increase large vehicle movement. The air quality is already impacted by high levels of local, A3 and M25 traffic. Why destroy more green belt, when a significant number of brown field sites exist.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Eden Hammond,

Ruth Jones, Cobham
This is a totally inappropriate development with significant detrmental impact on the surrounding areas. This is green belt andshould be protected. The traffic on this road is already very congested.

xxxxxxxx, west byfleet
Excess HGV traffic,Pollution,Greenbelt,Uneccessary, need I go on, for goodness sake engage brains Elmbridge Council and say no.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
NO NO NO!!!

Scott, Byfleet

Robin P Voice, New Malden
Using the Name Barnes Wallis is a snub to a great man. As a regular user of the Byfleet Road, thought should be given to reducing traffic not increasing it.

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead
There are far more appropriate brown field locations for this kind of installation - once the green belt is gone it's gone for good.

moira gill, Weybridge

Konstanze Graham, Cobham

Alastair Graham, Conham
The proposed plant will have a very damaging environmental and health impact on the population of Cobham and Weybridge, particularly on children. The HGVs involved in transportation to and from the plant will cause congestion even greater than at present in the Byfleet Road and emit fumes and cause vibration to houses near this road.The planning application flouts Green Belt policy.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
You cannot build this on green belt land. We cannot allow it.

Richard Knights, Byfleet

Mavis Knights, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

David Plummer, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Surely an alternative site in a less populated area would be a better solution for all

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Godalming

Sally-Jane Palmer, Surbiton
This is far too close to the school that I work at and is a major health and safety concern for us all.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
The incinerator will be a disaster for Elmbridge

Camilla Hawkins, Weybridge
No to pollution, increased traffic and environmental impact.

Jeannette Sage, ulverston
We live in an area down wind of sellafield nuclear power station. For a small area there is a very high percentage of cancers with almost every family i know having a relative die of cancer related conditions. I fully support the petition.

E Fitzpatrick, Ashford
must be stopped, could destroy a lovely course

Chris Allen, Tadworth

xxxxxxxx, london

mark hynes, godstone

Neil Baldwin, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, New Malden

Dave Gore, Addlestone

Ray Walsh, Walton-on-Thames

Guillaume Battini, Paris
Living abroad but a regular to Silvermere, the place has such an history to protect

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Graham Neale, Bisley

Simon Gill, Marlow

xxxxxxxx, Wokingham

xxxxxxxx, Guildford

d higgs, godalming

lloyd spencer, Bisley
Why do they always have to spoil things when there is other sites and options. Green belt is important to be kept.

Derek Demuth, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, East Clandon
The HGV traffic alone will add to an already congested road in the rush hour. This is totally inappropriate in this area.

xxxxxxxx, Crawley

xxxxxxxx, Dorking
Totally unsuitable site.

j pullen, surrey
Going ahead with such a site will totally ruin Silvermere golf course. Silvermere offer a place to unwind, relax and enjoy the peaceful setting around you. The clubhouse is a excellent place to eat, soaking up the atmosphere whilst enjoying the views across the lake.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Please do not let this happen. The negative effects from acidification and from noise and air pollution will be a blight on the Cobham area.

K. Carmichael, Surbiton
Please make the correct decision... It is simply ridiulous to even think that this is a good thing!!!!

xxxxxxxx, East Clandon
This is an innappropriate use of Greenbelt land.

Wendy Cady, Woking

Paul Jemetta, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Brian Street, Midhurst
we always enjoy coming to Silvermere,it would be a crime to lose all these facilities.

xxxxxxxx, west byfleet
Don't destroy our greenbelt zone anymore, this will create more air, more road and more noise pollution !! This is already a high density area with the continuing development at Brooklands.

xxxxxxxx,

Mr Clive Rainford, Storrington
I travel from Sussex, having used Silvermere for many years when I lived in Surrey, to enjoy the first class facilities and beautiful golf course and I am astounded that this application is being considered for this lovely and historic location. As I recall the lake was used by Barnes Wallace and the M.O.D during the second world war for testing of models for the bouncing bomb. Shame on you Elmbridge Council!

Miles Couchman, Teddington
This is a beautiful part of the Surrey countryside, quite apart from being one of the most enjoyable golf courses I know around London. I am appalled at the idea of this development, and strongly oppose it.

Leigh Wells, Fleet

Julie Wells, F

xxxxxxxx, Chessington
Silvermere golf course is a wonderful course as well as the surrounding area, so please leave it alone and protect it.

Sue Barr, Leatherhead

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Apart from environmental impact, traffic on Byfleet Road is often grid-locked, so this proposal is ridiculous.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Please protect our greenbelt and the tranquility around Silvermere.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

John S Porter, EPSOM

xxxxxxxx, Twickenham
Just the problem of the additional HGV traffic in the area ought to be sufficient to squash this planning application.

Mr David Warfield, Ashford
We must protect our green space

M G Bateman, Hindhead
Unbelievable!

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

dave knight, bromley

Sophia Ghaleh-Mahmoudi, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Woking

Stephen Taylor, Petworth
Good luck, we are behind you

xxxxxxxx, WestWickham

Patrick Molloy, cobham

Ray Corstin, East Clandon

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Access by large vehicles on an already very congested road is not acceptable

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

Chris Rowell,

Jim Hains, New Malden
Not only do incinerators stink so does this decision by Elmbridge Council. Someone is benefiting and it is'nt the environment or the residents

xxxxxxxx, Tudor avenu

xxxxxxxx, Chertsey

David Jackson, Leatherhead

Steve Murphy, Croydon

xxxxxxxx, East Grinstead
This is not the right place for the incinerator and it does not sound very "green". This area is too populated for something like that.

Neil Lismorel,

xxxxxxxx, Dartford

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Has consideration been given to increased traffic on the already heavily congested Byfleet (and Seven Hills)Roads? What about the health implications for children attending schools in the surrounding areas? Have the owners of the new retirement home at the corner of Byfleet Road been consulted? Will the smoke inhalation improve the golf swing of members and visitors of St. George's Hill and Silvermere Golf Clubs???

Graham Bramhall, Downside, Cobham
We have already lost too much green belt land to the unnecessary M25 services, we can't afford to lose any more. additionally what guarantees aare there that this will not become an environmental hazard. Hans off

xxxxxxxx, Chobham
These people need to get in touch with lcoal feeling and understand that these plants are not welcome in established areas of recreation.

Bill Stone, Weybridge

Diana Isherwood Stone, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Kingston
This simply must not happen. There is already enough traffic issues in Weybridge and to add that site to the quite and clean area would be near on criminal

xxxxxxxx, Bromley

Anne S. Bjordal, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Additoional HGV traffic will cause many more delays to Byfleet Rd. which is already overloaded at times during the day. Health concerns arise from fumes.

Denise Duce, Reading

Ray Roberts, Kingston

David Williams, Wimbledon

xxxxxxxx, Camberwell

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-thames
There is a school nearby, please consider somewhere less populated.

kim buckley, crawley

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

German Yusti, Weybridge
This area is a green belt, not an industrial site, there is plenty of other places where they can establish this plan without ruining the peace, roads and environment of so many people.

Susan Rayner, Cobham
This is a totally unsuitable development for a primarily residential area and may adversely affect not only the wildlife on the golf course but surrounding nursing homes for elderly as the long term effects on health are not known.

xxxxxxxx, London

Camille Humphrey, Dorking

Gordon Frame, Windlesham
This proposed development is completely inappropriate for this location

Peter Samuel, Addlestone

Nathalie Vaughan-Smith, Cobham

Louise Goya-Perez, Weybridge

mervyn smith, cheam
This seems a ridiculous proposal to talk of green benefits when there are disgraceful consequences to an important leisure and sports facility.

ian gwyer, high wycombe

Marcia Bence, Ascot
I am disgusted that such a scheme could even be envisaged as near to a public recreation area as this is. It definitely should not be allowed to go ahead.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
The good people that built Wisley Airfield during the 2nd World War – because of its proximity to Brooklands Airfield - would turn in their graves if they knew what a blot on the beautiful Surrey landscape future greedy and selfish generations would consider building there.

At the time, Britain was united in its efforts to remain Great, and prevent the Germans from invading our green and pleasant land. Those who laboured to build the airfield would be stunned and disgusted to see their ancestors being disrespectful towards otherwise unblemished countryside.

Constructing an 80ft stack within meters of RHS Wisley Gardens - one of the most glorious and world renowned family attractions in the UK - would not only create a hideous carbuncle and eyesore, it is also likely to omit pollutants which would have a detrimental effect on the communities in the surrounding villages, and could seriously impact all the magnificent work that generations of RHS Wisley employees have laboured over to create a sustainable environment that future generations would be proud of.

Given that “sustainability” and “corporate social responsibility” are key 21st century buzzwords, I urge the developers and planning committees to be far-sighted, lead by example, and consider how proud their ancestors will be in years to come when they discover how their predecessors made the decision which preserved the charm of rural Surrey, rather than ruined it.

xxxxxxxx, Staines
D.A.Hart

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Sheer insanity combined with stupidity. Who in their own mind would design such a plant in a densely populated green belt area with thousands of school children within few miles, without mentioning the already clogged road network. Plenty of other sites. Clearly the result of some smart brainstorming from SCC. This has to be fought all the way to the national authority, further anybody resposnible for suggesting this project should be sued in a court of law...And who would ever pick a flawed design from a bankrupt design...Bad April's fool.

Caroline,

xxxxxxxx, woking
Disgusted that it is even being considred

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
We are very concerned about the proximity of the incinerator to our children's school

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Stupid place to put this thing!!!!!

Peter Dallen, Camberley

Andrew Brown, Guildford

Kevin Williams, Leatherhead
THE WRONG SITE FOR A PLANT OF THIS NATURE. IT'S GREEN BELT AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION IS BAD ENOUGH AS IT IS WITHOUT ADDING CONVOYS OF HGV'S. Elmbridge site location criteria needs re examination.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Anthony Lines, Walton-on-Thames
This will be a blight on a beautiful historic site.

xxxxxxxx, WIMBLEDON

peter michael munday, reigate
Silvermere is a beautiful golf course and would be badly affected by the proposed development and I therfore strongly object to it!!!

Nigel Paul, West Molesey

xxxxxxxx, kingston

Ingrid Monteyne, Guildford
Harmfull to green belt
Disaster to the local environment

xxxxxxxx, West Horsley

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet, Surrey
The Elmbridge area already has a high rate of asthma sufferers, including myself and other young members of my family who live in Byfleet, this will just add to pollution levels.

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
There are many schools in the vicinity of the proposed depot, (including our grandchildren's) why do we want to subject them to yet more pollution, we already have the M25 and heathrow on our doorstep.

Conie Mascarenhas, Middlesex

John Rennocks, Oxshott
The traffic in the vicinity of this proposed scheme is already horrendous for much of the day,NAND his will make it far worse by adding many heavy goods vehicles.

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead
Dont spoil the greenbelt

xxxxxxxx, London
Unbelievable, what are you thinking? The golf course will be ruined.

Shaun Schmidt, Weybridge

Brian Crook, West Byfleet
Ruin a natural site

Sally McAlister, Watford

Rachel Golding, Hersham

Gil Ben-Ari, Coulsdon
We have family in the area, including a baby grand-daughter now nearly eight months old. The pollution to the air will be unacceptable and will be carried by the wind to the surrounding area. We do not want our family subject to these air pollutants

xxxxxxxx, Horsham
A poorly thought through plan and the wrong location , we must protect greenbelt land from these type of developments

Frank Hanafin, Weybridge
This road is already grid locked every morning and evening, ridiculous idea, absolutely not!

Alan Fletcher, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This is greenbelt land. Use a more appropriate location. There are plenty of ex-MOD and brown field sites that can be used instead.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Gary Randall, byfleet
It is not a case of "not on my doorstep" but more a case of why ruin a beautiful greenbelt area.

Charles Dukes, Godalming

nikki Greig, sutton

Tony Mundy, New Haw

xxxxxxxx,

SIMON MOUNT, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Too many movements on a road that is already having a care home built right on the corner which in itself is going to cause traffic problems with movements onto a very busy road

xxxxxxxx, Hampton

A.Matthews, Petersfield

xxxxxxxx, Fleet

Maire Colohan,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Richard Hall, Addlestone
Why spoil a pleasant environment which gives exercise and pleasure to thousands of people every year. Redhill Road together with the junction with Byfleet Road is not designed for the large number of lorries which will be required to service this site.

xxxxxxxx, Epsom
There are pently of other sites where the incinerator could be located. There is no need to put it so close to many leisure facilities.

xxxxxxxx, Epsom

Brian Taylor, Woking, Surrey
This plan is a disgrace and needs thinking through more. Find somewhere in an industrialised area please.

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead

Mr.R.G.Pulley, Fleet
Do not want it wind will blow ashes all over the golf course and ruin all the greens.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
Consider the environment¬

xxxxxxxx, Woking

Alistair Whittle, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Redhill Road was closed to access from the A3 slip road some years ago presumably for traffic reasons but these proposal will cause serious problems on an already congested Byfleet Road.
The Area is Green Belt with several public footpaths crossing the area
There is conflicting research as to the safety of this operation which would make a decision to proceed dubious

Jonathan king, West byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
How exactly was this planning given? What was the nature of the lobbying? Who will be left with the clean-up bill or worse if the business fails and the developers walk away? Not convinced by the safety arguments - we do not know about the long term health effects, particularly for children. I think there is a school close by and certainly lots of families use Silvermere. How will the already congested road infrastructure cope with inevitable increase in LGVs. It would be nice if the Council for once listened to local objections, that is the point of elections and democracy.

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

JOHN SALLIS, Woodham. Addlestone
There must be a less damaging location for such a development than this. A site already used for refuse would be good

xxxxxxxx, Worcester Park

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I am extremely concerned about the health risks to my family, especially my two young children.

Emily Kidd, Pyrford

xxxxxxxx, east molesey

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Phillip Korn, Stanmore

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Not here, it's a beautiful location, there are plenty of not so naturally lovely areas such as Woking where this could be sited instead!

lee stapleton, london

xxxxxxxx, London
How many more preposterous proposals will 'planners' allow ?????

Adi Screwvala, Byfleet
This is an inappropriate development at this site which will encroach on valueable greenbelt and increase traffic on surrouding roads which are already unacceptably congested at peak times.

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames
a disgrace its got this far.

John Dabill, Guildford
This proposal simply cannot go ahead in such an area. The traffic this would cause on such small and already crowded roads. The pollution caused by the incinerator and the visual aspects of the design. How can the incompetent leaders on Surrey County Council have allowed it to get this far!! I am tired that we who live in Surrey continually have to fight these sort of insane proposals.

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
Most stupid idea of the year so far!

Vanessa Davis, walton on thames
Please stop this

Lawrence Redding, yateley
why spoil a loveley golf course

Barrie Parker, Claygate

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, ewell
please consider the golf course evn my children play there

Donna Smith, Cobham

Adam Lungley, Carshalton
This is not right, no only for the beautiful country side but also for the wildlife present in the area.

Steve Dawes, Leatherhead
We need to address the total long term commercial and environment impact of such projects before ticking the short term green energy targets.Where politics and science divide...... Nonsense and short sighted....

Wendy Pfeiffer, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, London
do not live in area but a frequent visitor to Silvermere Golf Course

xxxxxxxx, New Haw, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

Mr J Pollock, Cobham
Not a good idea...

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

xxxxxxxx, London
I will absolutely say NO for the incinerator plant. Please protect GREEN belt.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Mary Bond, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, Bracknell

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Building this in a heavily populated area where traffic congestion is already a major problem is madness. There are plenty of sites with easier access, away from densely residential areas. Very unhappy at the prospect of increased traffic pollution, let alone the pollution from the incinerator itself.

Paul Gowers, Guildford

xxxxxxxx, Woking

d cosh, walton on thames
this is a mad place to build this near old folks home a school and recreation land

xxxxxxxx, woodham
Traffic in area is alreday unacceptable and enviornmental impact over a heavily populated areas and green belt needs to be reviewed

xxxxxxxx, London
It would be such a pity to see the beauty of Silvermere and its surrounding areas blighted by effects of industry. It would seem to me that there are alternative locations away from an area many people use as easy access to enjoy nature and quiet time.

Sarah Blackman, Godalming

xxxxxxxx, Gt Bookham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Tony Ahmet, Carshalton
This would not only be a disaster for Silvermere Golf but for all local residents.

David Parsons, Weybridge
Who are the ridiculous prople who draw up such schemes for an area of outstanding beauty? I imagine they do not live locally so it is either crass stupidity or envy.

xxxxxxxx, Kingston

xxxxxxxx, London
A wonderful public golfing facility which should not be sabotaged in such a way. This is purely from the stance of the golf club, let alone the adverse traffic effect it will have on a beautiful area of Surrey.

Mark Rust, Bracknell
i love silvermere its a heavenly place, to build a waste incinerator is a disaster it musn't happen

Mrs Susan Chapple, Weybridge
This incinerator would be a major health hazard to this area

xxxxxxxx, Woking

u rohtlaan, walton-on-thames
Why spoil peoples leasure time

xxxxxxxx, Woking
Golf should not be played next to any noise making facilities. it should be a peaceful area for relaxation and enjoyment. this proposal is set to ruin that which in turn will lead to a decrease in golf at Silvermere, in turn possible leading to job losses.

Chris Yates, Cobham

xxxxxxxx,

Andrew Barrowman, Claygate, Esher
Awful idea!

Sarah Paterson, Byfleet

Jane Newell, Woking

xxxxxxxx, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Laleham
This area of greenbelt must be protected. Do not let this development take place

xxxxxxxx, Caterham

xxxxxxxx, Effingham

Ian Tozer, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Dorking

Kevin Chamberlain, Crowthorne

xxxxxxxx, walton-on-thames
please no incinerator

Michael Lee, Guildford
Outrageous!Beautiful site.Totally wrong site for incinerator

xxxxxxxx, Hampton

xxxxxxxx, Teddington

xxxxxxxx, Chertsey

Colin Barwick, West Molesey
Dont ignore this petition like you did in Anne Way, West Molesey

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Peter Davies, London

Ann Nicholls, Frimley

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Ralph Sutton, North End House
This project will destroy a green belt area of natural beauty with respect to air quality, traffic and noise.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

a mackenzie, london

xxxxxxxx, Shepperton
Investigation into a similar development in Charlton village (near Shepperton) has proved that these incinerators are far from green. Do SCC or Government care? Clearly not. If you value your green areas and health object. You can only defeat this by active campaign and weight of numbers petitioning. Mad positioning in what is already a dense traffic area.

Ruth Quinn, Esher

mick gordon, epsom
the surrounding roads already struggles with the volume of traffic without adding so much more HGV vehicles.

Robin Byers, London
This is a monstrous disregard for the health & safety of a sizeable population of human beings not rabbits including children. The effect upon local house prices will impact heavily.This site has clearly been chosen for its convenience for the HGV's etc further exacerbating the traffic on a relatively busy road WITH COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR USERS & LOCAL INHABITANTS. Gases & smells will inevitably escape and don't believe the project engineers.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

KARE N CROMPTON, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This area is not suitable for the incinerator because there are so many childrens living within affected area. This is not a concern about a health issue but also a promised green belt in this area.

John Cook, Ascot

xxxxxxxx, Haywards Heath
I work in Leatherhead & regularly visit Silvermere & am stunned at the thought this development could even be considered on such a beautiful site, the roads are busy enough around the area, find an industrial site to build this!

xxxxxxxx, Chertsey

Samantha Burgess, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, New Malden

Jane Fox, Caterham
Protect the green belt!

xxxxxxxx, Ripley

Elliot Kutner, Redhill

Jim Tuck, Walton on Thames
I believe that green space should be protected from this kind of development and that the enjoyment of Silvermere users such as myself would be significantly reduced due to noise pollution and reduced air quality. In addition, egress from Redhill Road on to the A245 is already a difficult process and the addition of numerous heavy and slow moving vehicles will undoubtedly cause more accidents and increase congestion.

xxxxxxxx, Feltham
I play golf at Silvermere regularly and if this is built i will have to seriously consider playing there again.

Charlie Vaughan-Griffith,
Poorly thought out. protect the greenbelt - there must be more suitable industrial sites over the UK. Common sense please.

xxxxxxxx, Egham

Corinne, Cobham

A. Simonyan, Hersham
This must be a terrible joke, a pollution disaster in the centre of natural beauty? Of course we say - NO! Think about the health of our children - PLEASE!

richard stevens, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Southwood, Farnborough
This plan needs to be reconsidered, especially as Silvermere promotws wildlife within it's grounds. This area is classed as greenbelt and needs to remain as greenbelt

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Completely the wrong location for an incinerator. Think about the impact on the countryside, animals and people.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I moved out of central London to give my young family a better, healthier quality of life. This proposal has not been well thought out - in no way is a "green" option when you take into account increased air pollution, traffic and noise pollution...setting aside the obvious eyesore. This must not go ahead.

Christina Zandona, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Dave Hughes, Guildford

Neil Brown, Byfleet

Petra Langen-Pieters, Addlestone

k hicks, surbiton
As a member of staff at silvermere ec i strongly object to the incineration plant due to health & safety issues and its innappropriate placement on the greenbelt.

t j hicks, surbiton
I Strongly object to the gasification plant asi travel to silvermere as a leisure pursuit to enjoy the peace and fresh air of greenbelt land

Sarah Connor, Weybridge

Phil Shaz, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

simon white, Godalming
Would ruin a lovely habitat and the infrastructure locally simply isn't up to it.

John Newman, whitton

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead

Joanne Whitaker, Guildford

Cecilia Rappe, Weybridge

V Austin, Cobham

A . Hyde, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

mark james, sutton

dean currie, surbiton

David Watson, Amersham
This is beautiful woodland that should not be polluted in this way. As a visting golfer, I have had many enjoyable days at Silvermere and I'm appalled that this application can be considered. It must be stopped!

paul fowler, camberley

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Hayley Oxborough, Hersham

Louise long, Tadworth

Gordon Brierley, Woking
Totally inappropriate and ill-conceived, especially as another incinerator is planned for the former Wisley Airfield site less than a couple of miles away.

Francine Sheridan, london

xxxxxxxx, Bookham
Protect this green and open space from such an unwarranted and ill advised plan

Andrew Hartley, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Paul Whitney, Catford
Will ruin my great days at Silvermere and friends local environments. I jhave seen what the one in Central London has done. Not to mention the wildlife and Greenbelt itself!

John Moss,

xxxxxxxx, Aldershot

Irfan Ahmed, weybridge
Unbelieveable, it is going to traffic chaos, unsightly, more air pollution whether it is through traffic or the incinerator.

chrissie twigg-stewart, weybridge
Vehemently opposed.

xxxxxxxx, chertsey

M richardson, East Horsley
We object to the HGV traffic above all else. ONLY if the exit to Redhill Road from the M25 was opened would this be acceptable - NOT from the Brooklands/Cobham road

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Streatham
This does not appear to be the right location, the spread of exhaust pollution over the golf course would be detrimental.

xxxxxxxx, COBHAM
I am against this incinerator.
Here are my reasons :

A) National Green Belt policy statement
Source :
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/155499.pdf

1. para 2.1 “that Green Belt characteristics is their permanence and their protection must be maintained as far as can be seen ahead”.
2. Para 3.15 goes on to state “the visual amenities of the Green Belt should not be injured by proposals for development within or conspicuous from the Green Belt…(which)…might be visually detrimental by reason of their siting….”.
3. Para 3.2 states “inappropriate development is, by definition harmful to the Green Belt and it is for the applicant to show why permission should be granted”.
4. Para 3.4 states “construction of new buildings inside a Green Belt is inappropriate unless for certain specific types of developments (listed).” …This does NOT include incinerators!

B) Planning for sustainable waste management
Source :
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/1876202.pdf

See page 19/28
"Ensuring a Strong, Healthy and Just Society.
Meeting the diverse needs of all people in existing and future communities, promoting personal wellbeing, social cohesion and inclusion, and creating equal opportunity for all."

Roger Keay, Thorpe Bay
Build it somewhere else

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Rod Mac Donald, Camberley

Toby Foreman, West Byfleet
Please protect our Greenbelt

Liz Gardner, Claygate

xxxxxxxx, Cobham Surrey

xxxxxxxx, Claygate

xxxxxxxx, Kingston
The impact on health, saftey, local road infrastructure and wildlife has not been taken into full consideration with this planning application. The power station must not go ahead!

Mike Turner, Weybridge

D Maidment, Walton-on-Thames

Duncan Wyeth, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Kekoo Sethna, Weybridge
Please do not build incenerators on green belt land. As it is the area is over crowded and we have huge traffic problems.

Denise Jones,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

sarah palmer, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Hamish Mitchell, Bodmin
This is why we moved to Cornwall and clean air!

emma donald, puttenham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Debbie Conibere, Weybridge
Local School, Local Traffic and Local People would all be affected if this went ahead. Keep our Green Belt green!

Debbie Cain, weybridge

Charles Beresford, Weybridge
As a resident in the area and suffering from lung problems I am extremely concerned about this potential health hazard both for me and my family.Also the major disruption to traffic flow is unacceptable,we already have too many Tesco lorries cloging the area, its got to stop.

Louise Beresford, Weybridge
I am totally against this proposal due the harm it will cause to my husbands health who has a lung condition.

Katherine Sutcliffe, New Haw Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Woking

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
Not the right place for this project - far too built up.

Kevin Overton, Weybridge

Natalie Overton, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Obviously Green Belt doesn't mean anything these days, especially to Elmbridge Council!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This may be a brown field ex industrial site, but it is so close to local amenities (Schools,golf club, equestrian centre. Wisly Gardens and hotel) and the site of a new, large, senior citizens home, that it should not be considered as an appropriate location for a busy, noisy operation such as this. There must be more suitable brown field sites in the locality that are closer to the main trunk roads, that do not require the encroachment on already overworked local roads that this plan entails.

samantha court, addlestone

Audrey Evans, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

John Leheup, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
No thank you......!!!!!!!!

Richard Mulhall, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
WRONG PROJECT, WRONG PLACE; TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE; THINK AGAIN.......

xxxxxxxx, London

Sarah Pinsent, Shepperton

melanie farmer, byfleet

Michelle Thomas, Chertsey

Allison Haffenden, Byfleet
This area is already polluted with the M25 so close, and we don't need more lorries causing problems!!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Andrew O\'Neill, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Dorking
Please protect this Green Belt.

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Slough

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Michael Edginton, Weybridge
This is completely inappropriate!

James Girling-Budd, Cobham
Why is green belt land being abused when brown field sites are available

B. Newman, Byfleet
I am totally aginst this incinerator and find it unbelievable that Elmbridge borough council would even consider this application.

Becky Lewis, Weybridge

Dale Coskery, Oxshott
Inappropriate and dangerous in an urban neighbourhood

DONALD LEGGET, WEYBRIDGE
I have read the extremely detailed letter. I agree with all the points made. What worried me most is that one of the paries is in the processs of going bust.. Mt brother used to live in Foxholm and I know this site wekk. It is an attempt by the developers to make a fast buck out of what is a useless site,

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
extremely disappointing that the councils (elmbridge and surrey) have not communicated anything about this to residents. thanks to those who have highlighted this in advertisements and by word of mouth.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Brian Millard, Bookham
As a user of Silvermere Golf Course I am horrified at the prospect of this Biomass Gasification incinerator being built nearby

Michelle Sweet, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, byfleet

David Ross, Shepperton
Protect the green belt, there are plenty of other undeveloped areas to build this thing

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Fran Reed, Cobham

Rich Reed, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Brenda Chamberlain, Leatherhead

MR Simpson, Richmond
Green should mean Green

Peter Cummins, Walton
Unbelievable that an incinator power station can be contemplated inside the M25, still less in this particular spot. Surrey Council, you know what to do!

Umang Patel, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, New haw

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Protecting the environment

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Hersham

Pam Crellin, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This can only only have a negative effect on our environment - most importantly health, traffic congestion (already bad) and wildlife - especially the bird population which is only just recovering in the area.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This is an entirely unsuitable site for this purpose and a traffic blackspot. It needs to be relocated to a more suitable location

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Totally unacceptable for the area

Rogermeek, Esher
Level of pollution in green belt area not acceptable also increased traffic will cause congestion and road safety issues

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Too close to our home and way too close for our local schools. We should also consider the devaluation of local properties by having the incinerator close by. Ask if they are prepared to pay the incremental difference to EVERY home owner in the area. Do not let this happen!!

r reed,

David Ramage, Chobham Woking
This cannot be allowed to go ahead. It will have a serious detrimental impact to all surrounding areas. Stop the planning now.

lesley Corrie, Cobham

Martin Cave, Grays, Essex

Tove Lind, Esher
I strongly oppose the building of a wasteincinerator this close to Silvermere golf club and the green belt area. The fumes and airpollution

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
What a ridiculous choice of location in such a densely populated area with access that is already bottlenecked.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Anne Gregory, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Surely there's a better place for it!

xxxxxxxx, Walton On Thames
Totally ridiculous, the area is densely populated and needs no more pollution risk to people or wildflife and the local roads are fit to burst at the best of times let alone where there are issues on the M25 and/or A3.

sam, Kingston
I am moving to Weybridge, I'm moving away from Kingtson to get away from pollution, not closer to it

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
I am shocked that this is even being considered by the local council and shows how out of touch with locals/residents they really are.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Surrey

Vicki Gibb, Byfleet

Warren Gibb, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

Andy Park, W O T

brad gibb, byfleet
its to close to houses and byfleet village

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames

Victoria wild, Esher

Richard Bartlett, Weybridge
This is not good news for the local area. Apart from the environmental issues, the added traffic along the already far to busy A245 (Byfleet Road) will make it a nightmare.

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

Melanie Heath, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, wey road

Andy Sharp, Weybridge
Just not suitable for this area

douglas smith, cobham
please do not build

Justin Evans, Horley

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I am especially concerned about the impact on golfers, users of Silvermere and people who walk their dogs in the woods nearby

xxxxxxxx, Byfleeet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Why here and not other brown sites that are available. The reason we live here is to be able to enjoy the green belt area and the ability to allow our children the opportunity to be outside in fresh air. There are also enough trucks clogging up the inadequate road system around Byfleet and Weybridge - more trucks would just make this impossible.

xxxxxxxx, Old WOking

Andrew Gulliford, Cobham

bradley, byfleet
no no no !

D J L Crowley, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
This is terrible

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton
Huge campaigns encouraging us to reduce our carbon footprint and the adverse effect we're having on the planet and yet this is being considered?!

Kate Brenner, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I strongly oppose the building of the proposed incinerator. This area is simply too highly populated and we will all suffer from the increased traffic and pollution.

David Gibb, Tolworth
We're moving to the area and don't want the health and traffic hazards!

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I strongly object to this incinarator. We do not need it. The pollution and increased congestion are important negative uses.

Chris Davies, Torquay
There must be an alternative, and either way there needs to be full PUBLIC CONSULTATION.

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
What an appalling idea, how much more can a community take in a beautiful build up area.

Trevor Robinson, Weybridge
Inadequate roads to cope with existing traffic. Potential accident risk/closeness to National Grid power lines, loss of green belt and loss of amenity to the community. NO to this

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Fetcham
This would be a disaster, not just on an environmental level, but to add to the already congested and often gridlocked road system surrounding the propsed site shows that no-one in any planning capacity has actualy experienced using the roads at peak and off-peak times.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Inappropriate development in the wrong place

Lisa Threlfall, Cobham
We pay the taxes. Listen to the people who DO NOT want this polluting Incinerator to be built......

xxxxxxxx, Webridge

HELEN GRIGGS, WEYBRIDGE

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
A more suitable site, further away from schools and residential areas should be sourced. We should all fight to protect our green belt.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
Dominic Raab, MP for Esher and Walton says that protecting the greenbelt is on his top 3 priorities... time to show it!

Robert Hayden, Weybridge
I'm generally open minded about new technology and development since we have new problems to solve but I'm very concerned about the potential for pollutants in an extremely densely populated part of the country, as well as the impact on water supplies used for cooling. I don't see that this proposal brings any benefit to the people who live in this area so why should it go ahead, and the safety evidence seems as yet unproven.

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

xxxxxxxx, WEST BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

R Martin, Walton

Richard Attwood-Smith, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This is a residential area and not an industrial site.

Suella Ritchie, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, shepperton
Seriously concern regarding children at school less than 1 mile away & protection of the local environment in this Green Belt

Paul McGuire, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Greenbelt land should not be used for such purposes. Such risks should not be taken with the health of our children.

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Nicholas Orr, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I strongly oppose this planning.

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, SURREY

xxxxxxxx, Pyrford

Miss Bella, Walton On Thames

Mr Laszlo, Walton On Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, molesey

rebecca scorer,

xxxxxxxx, East Molesey, Surrey

Harvey Elliott, Weybridge

D Mackinnon, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Nicholas Kjelgaard, Byfleet

Joanna Kjelgaard, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Do not kill our children

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
To put something with such disastrous health risks is outrageous and we owe it to our children to make sure that it does not happen.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, cobham

Paul Bruton, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
So much for transparency! I would just like to reiterate everything that has been said: health consequences, traffic chaos, an eyesore, on Green Belt land etc. There is surely somewhere more appropriate for an incinerator. It's certainly not here. The Green Belt is there for a reason, not to be utilized at the whim of SCC.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, claygate

Frank van Ekeren, Oxshott

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Tamarin Goldsmith, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher

John Ebdon,

Jo Barlow, Long Ditton

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Esher

Brian Smith, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Why in a populated area? There are certainly many other safer options

Sarah Ferguson, Walton-on-Thames

Ben Ferguson, Walton-on-Thames

Mrs Bowen, Esher
No thank you! Green belt must be protected. Serious lack of consideration.

Suzanne Azar, Kingston

Tracey Whicker, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on thames
This project will polute a large area where many people live and visit. As an asthma sufferer I am very worried about it.

xxxxxxxx, Claygate
I am a father of two young children, both of whom attend School locally and live within the area to be impacted which are located very close proximity to the proposed site of the Incinerator.

The reasons for my objection to the above planning permission are:

1. The detrimental effect on children's health.

2. Building on Green Belt, which would not be in accordance with the Law.

3. Environmental impact
- the site is currently a haven for wildlife
- there would be increased light and noise pollution

4. Overcrowding and danger from very large lorries making deliveries.

5. Negative impact on cyclists, ramblers, riders and golfers.

6. The presence of an incinerator would be completely unsuitable in an area of natural beauty.

xxxxxxxx, Stoke d\\'Abernon

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

Nuala Kearney, Esher

Ross Taylor, esher

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Esher
don't do it for our children!

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
This is simply awful and simply CANNOT happen, lorries, traffic most importantly polution!!

Stephen Scott, walton-on-thames
Fundamentally the wrong location for such a project. The roas is busy enough, sports facilities and schools would be effected and further green belt area in the Elmbridge region destroyed.

Lance Drake, Stoke D\\'Abernon

Julie Mellish, Walton on Thames
The proposals will be a disaster

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Katie Cooper, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Don't destroy our village!

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher
incredible - thanks for organising this site

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Air pollution is already a concern in this area due to its proximity to major roads, M25, A3. Adding to this makes no sense without the strongest possible justification. At present, there is no convincing argument that need outweighs the very many disadvantages of this project.

xxxxxxxx, Claygate
There must be places further away from communities then the proposed site. Lets not ruin our futures, we realise that we need these facilities but having them close to where people live is really not good.

Emma Lynn, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Wendy Didaskalou, Weybridge

Tamara Frasik, Walton-On-Thames
Protect our enviroment and our childrens Health

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I do not believe that this project has been thought through properly. Is it to generate a pathetic amount of electricity or to save wood going to landfill? If wood has to b eimported then it falls between two stools.

Oliver Northeast, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Wrybridge

A Haley, Weybridge

Hammad Nawaz, WEYBRIDGE

Chris Sheldrake, Knaresborough

GillianSheldrake, Knaresborough

Jacqui Stephenson, Weybridge
This will affect the area and is not needed

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

Martina Blake, Oxshott
A highly unsuitable location affecting many people in nearby towns and villages and a road with horrific traffic problems already. Everyone we know thinks this is a bad idea. Very unhappy with SCC and their lack of common sense.

Angela Rhydderch,

Alex Bowman, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Absolutly no way it's a disaster waiting to happen.this plan must not be allowed to go ahead. Davidcameron must r informed.

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Yet another rediculous idea. I wonder what the kickbacks are for the SCC... NO to the incinerator!!

Ann Singer, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
I think this is mad! Not only is this a green belt area with both golf clubs and more importantly schools and wildlife reserves within it, we already have immense polution and noise to put up with the never ending trail of tesco lorries (plus others) coming down Parvis Road 24/7, adding waste trucks to this already bad situation is pushing us to the limit and totally unacceptable....

xxxxxxxx, byfleet
With so many concerns particularly that of health a project such as


this should have been made aware
by post. I only became aware of the proposal through a friend.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Carol Lord,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge,

Jane winter, Walton on Thames

DR HOWES, Weybridge
Save our greenbelt before it's too late!!!!

E Chidwick, Sandhurst

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Lise Naughton, Reigate
Alternatives which do not negatively impact the health of residents in the area need to be investigated. And reduction in the amount of refuse that is generated e.g. supermarket over-packaging of goods.

xxxxxxxx, WALTON ON THAMES

xxxxxxxx, Claygate

xxxxxxxx, cobham
This should not even needed to be discussed....!!

James Kemp, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Claire Engeham, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone
Why is it that the local residents have not been made aware of this a long time ago and publicity against it has not been more obvious ? It's a scandal

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames

Kenn van Hauen, Byfleet
This is a crazy proposal and will bring nothing of benefit to the area. It is hard enough trying to negotiate your way along the congested A245 as it is, not to mention the devastating pollution to the environment and the depreciation in property prices. We see houses on the market already because people know their house won't sell with an Incinerator on the doorstep! Take your incinerator to a non-residential/Green Belt area!

Irene Looney, Cobham

Mr Robert Taylor, Byfleet

Peter F Hogg, Weybridge
Suggest writing to members of St Georges Hill Golf Club, Tennis Club and Silvermere Golf Club and residents of St Georges Hill.

Peter Martin, West Byfleet

Jo Baldwin, Penzance Cornwall
A crazy ludicrous proposal to in reality, poison the local area with dangerous toxins. Together with the M25 and the A3 residents will be choked. From an X resident who lived in Byfleet for 20 years and who still cares!! Stop this NOW!!

Patrick Brown, Walon on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
STOP THE INSANITY!

Tanya Hodges, Weybridge

janek schaefer, Walton-on-Thames
no dioxins from industry please

xxxxxxxx, West Molesey
This cannot be allowed to occur. Our health, and that of the you ng ones and the elderly, is at stake.

xxxxxxxx, Send / Woking
There are enough industrial sites to build something like this one - not on a valuable greenbelt.

tracey boatright, Walton-on-thames

Viv Clarke, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, surbiton

Nicola Phillips, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Kingston upon Thames

adam frost, london

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, London
I completely object to the proposed incinerator development. It is completely inappropriately sighted for the scale of activity intended to be carried out there.

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Toby Speller, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

E Mitchell, Weybridge
This will cause so many issues, health and nature for a start! Keep it away!!!

Frank Pache, Weybridge

mr geoffrey goldberg and Mrs ruth Goldberg, Byfleet
Do not have an email address. Emailed by local Councillor

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Neil Flarry, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead

xxxxxxxx, Aylesbury

Ellie Slade, Byfleet

Julie Cryer, Byfleet

Harry Slade, Byfleet

nicola, Horsell
An environmental disaster. The Government should be looking at the root cause of the issue!

Mark, Woking

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

john proctor, byfleet
the road junction of redhill road and the byfleet raod is bad at the best of
tmes how on earth can we cope wih a continuous flow of lories from this proposed site.

mrs h proctor, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Joanne hutt, Cobham

Sophiw Woollen, Egham

david,

xxxxxxxx, Reading
I agree with another signatory: This is not really an issue of whether Cobham itself is an appropriate place for such an incinerator, as they should not be built anywhere. The idea of zero emissions is nonsense - there will be a lot of Carbon Dioxide emitted, and it will be impossible to scrub all Dioxins from the emissions too. It is really hard to understand what Elmbridge Council are thinking here, unless it is a planning ploy as suggested by another signatory.

Christine Dearsley, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Jo Lovell, Byfleet
It's disgusting this is even being considered. There's obviously money to be made somewhere. It's just greed over people's lives and the wildlife

Maria Sawyer, Byfleet

Nicola Pullinger, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
no way!

Bowler, Byfleet
We have too much traffic in Byfleet as it is, we do not need more.

Jane Morin,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Holly Kelly, Byfleet

Rosalie Muir, Binfield
Why cant these toxic places be put on brownfield sites ? It seems that the powers that be hate anything do do with the country and scenic beauty and wont be happy until we are all living in a vile toxic concrete over populated ugly environment. I know I dont live directly in this area but the same thing is happening on my doorstep as well, the countryside must be preserved at all costs, there are alternatives but the governement want to destroy our countryside.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Sunbury-on-Thames
Keep this horribleness away from where my children are to grow up!

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Byfleet is directly affect by this proposed plan.

traffic in the area is already a major problem along the area leading to this site. The emissions that it will cause is unjustifiable because it is bound to increase as it is a commercial companies plan. The area is green belt and as such should be preserved for the future. While the plan falls in the Elmbridge Council are it is the residents of Woking that are most likely to be affected.Planner it is in your hands to protect the environment and the residents we hold you responsible for your actions.It begs consideration in the current financial climate can any company involved be capable of fullfilling and maintaining obligations and maintain the safety of the area.How long would it be before the operators find other waste/s that are more profitable and dangerous to residnts. This proposed plan must be rejected or take the risk locals take legal action for the results.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is too close to the residential area of Byfleet Village, which is made up mostly of families with children, huge health and safety issues of air pollution and HGVs on minor roads.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Traffic on Byfleet road is already a nightmare. no more lorries ! I also object to any development on green belt land as there is precious little of it, and large areas of brownfield sites which can be used for development of all kinds.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Keep our greenbelt just that, and no more lorries on Byfleet road for heavens sake !

melanie ross, byfleet
AS A MUM OF A VERY HAPPY HEALTHY 14 MONTH OLD TODDLER AND HOPEFUL PLANS FOR A FURTHER ADDITION TO OUR FAMILY , I AM VERY STRONGLY AGAINST THE INCINERATOR AS THE WORRY OF MY DAUGHTERS AND ANY FURTHER UNBORN CHILD /CHILDREN IS OF GREAT CONCERN, I AM ALSO A NANNY HOPING TO CHILD MIND IN THIS AREA AS WE LIVE IN A VERY FAMILY BUSY AREA, ALL OUR CHILDREN NEED PROTECTING FROM THESE VERY TOXIC FUMES , THIS CAN NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE BUILT AND HARM OUR CHILDREN .

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet, Surrey

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet, Surrey.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet, Surrey.

Adam Frost, london

Jim Craig, Byfleet
Doesn't solve the waste problem, you need more waste to keep fuelling it. Increases cancer risks, respiratory problems, doesn't reduce CO2 emissions and still leaves 30% of poisonous fly ash residue which needs to go to landfill.

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames

Edward Walliss, Epsom

xxxxxxxx,

Faye Playfoot, Byfleet

Darren. Playfoot, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Woking

M Llewellyn, Cobham

Jason Petsch, Cobham

Richard Burroughs, Thames Ditton
This surely cannot be allowed to go ahead.
There are better alternatives which must be explored.

RB Petsch, Esher

Travis Hansen, Weybridge

Alexia, London
NO! to the biomass gasification incinerator! This will damage animals, wildlife and environment

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
Strongly oppose this development in this area.

xxxxxxxx, chertser

Anthony, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, CHERTSEY
THIS PLAN NEED SERIOUS RE_THINKING . AS USUAL THE PUBLIC OPINION STANDS FOR NOTHING!

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

sharon croall, Byfleet
leave the green belt alone.

andrew jones, woking
Be careful about this proposed incinorator as we had a simular proposal at wisley airfield it was rejected but we ended up with a composting plant to be built there so this could be a ploy to develop other projects .
It is totaly unsutable to place such a sit in such a congested area for hgvs as the road infrastructure would need upgrading as well, we already have a fair proportion of recycling vehicles driving through Ripley a village which has been spoilt by to much traffic .
There are also health issues here to the whole and wider area as pollution of all sorts is already to high and adding to it is totaly irrisponible and totaly degrading to people ,wildlife,greenbelt,and leisure .
Also the person who suggested Woking as a possible site for a incinerator should be ashamed of themself as no town ,village ,or any populated area should be treated like Elbridge resident currentley are .
Also what about the water i read from another person that would cool the plant, where would that go , would it be trucked out or would it be allowed to flow into the local rivers and streams and how or would it be cleaned .
shame on both Elbridge and Surrey county councils for again ignoring the electorate on local issues , all they care about is how much money they can squease from the populas, we should all be more aware of proposals and act accordingly so No NO NO to the incinorator in Elbridge or any where .

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Having moved away from incinerators in Belvedere, Kent due to them causing life threatening Asthma, it is now horrific that there are plans to build another one on my doorstep. Life is more important than burning products and polluting the atmosphere.

Cllr Christine Elmer, Walton-on-Thames
Inappropriate use of this site. Traffic concerns which will also impact on my residents in Walton.

xxxxxxxx, Surrey
Putting this in residential areas is just wrong, there are lots of places where it could be located which would not cause problems. I don't think Lyne is a good idea as one person has stated, that is also a residential area and if you lived near it you would understand this.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Luton

xxxxxxxx, hersham
save our green belt.. we already have heavy lorry traffic on this road we dont need any more!

Linda Jackson, Lowestoft

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, surrey
could be that someone is making money on this as a back hander why else would they even consider this in a highly populated area the traffic around this area is already heavy and most mornings at a stand still and when the m25 has accidents on it this area i used as a cut through we have loads of schools near the area too would they want children breathing this up no they tried to get this in lyne big petition went ahead they didnt get permission so why bring it here when so many different locations that are not in a highly populated area

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Guildford
Definate NO to this

Guy Hill, Guildford

Michelle Eden, Hampton Hill
I am a volunteer at Katz Castle and ride at Silvermere Stables. It's a beautiful place to go. I can't understand why anyone would want to build an incinerator in such a lovely place, especially now there is a retirement home nearby.

ALASTAIR MORRISON, Cobham
I add my name to the petition on behalf of 387 pupils, aged 3 to 13, and the 70+ Staff who live, work and play on a school campus within a few hundred yards of the proposed site for this incinerator. Our concerns are for the health and safety of this school community and all those living in the local neighbourhood, and for the inevitable impact on the already over-burdened roads accessing Redhill Road.

Sharon ROWE, MORDEN
Not near to an historic Animal Santuary

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

lennox, wrecclesham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
It must be possible to find another site, not close to where people live and play sports and have to drive to their work and schools.

xxxxxxxx, Godalming
So incredibly opposed to putting an incinerator in such a densely populated area affecting so many school children and not to mention the added congestion from lorry traffic. Shame on the govt for selecting a site which will negatively impact the lives of so many!!!

Franciska de Boer, Addlestone

Victoria olivier, Weybridge

Tracy waring, Walton-on-Thames

Lesley Loizou, Leatherhead
Avery Healthcare Group are in the process of opening a 72 bed care home for elderly residents many of whomn suffer from respiratory problems and other auto immune diseases. We very much believe that the increase in heavy traffic vehicles will significantly impact on the health of our residents and are very concerned about the impact that the incinerator may have on their already compromised health. Whilst we understand the need for a site of this nature we believe that the location will be extremely deterimental to the residential location and the many vulnerable people within the immediate vicinity.

xxxxxxxx, Claygate

Jisfafengarse, Raduznyj
O Street follies: spending millions of dollars on a streetcar museum--with tracks but no cars--in the heart of Georgetown

------------------------------------------------------
lightsmade.com

Veronique Allwood, Kingston

xxxxxxxx, Woking

Graciela, Walton on Thames
We owe it to our future generations to have air free of pollution!!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Living close to the site im concerned for both my familys health and the impact on the already congested roads. This must be stopped

P>VIZOSO, weybridge sy
as an area of extremely high pollution levels and a massive rise in breast cancer rates over the last five years the building of such an incinerator would produce massive further health risks.

xxxxxxxx, Windsor

Kevi Tapsfield, Woking

Shane Hackett, Weybridge

William Newton, Walton on Thames
Build it in KINGSTON !!!

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Totally unsuitable location.

Rosemary Morgan, Guildford
This is not a suitable location for a Biomass incinerator.

David Robertson, Stoke Poges
I am wholly opposed to the planned incinerator site which, if implemented, will ruin the lives of a great many of the local citizens, their families and their children and will also cause lasting damage and degradation of the local and regional environment.

Clive Cane, New Haw

Peta Louise Jeffery, Leatherhead

Tony Royle, Weybridge
Would be wxtremely narrow-minded to allow this to happen.

Clive Powell, Ebreon, France
My wife died of cancer through pollutants and I sure as hell don't want to be put at risk whilst playing golf. These pollutants do kill. In addition, the infrastructure would not cope with the extra traffic. It's bad enough now.

mr k & mrs hone, addlestone
better places than redhill road which could be used in surrey

Denise Day, Walton On Thames

Val Hibberd, Gomshall
Find a waste ground for the incinerator not next to a animal sanctuary.

xxxxxxxx, twickenham

Dawn Hare, New Haw
I am pregnant and do not wish my unborn child to be subject to the toxic gases produced by this incinerator. Also I cannot believe that such a thing could be built in the greenbelt!

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone
This a proposterous idea in such a beautiful green belt area. It will have a serious detrimental effect on the environment, people's health and will compromise an already difficult traffic flow area. What happens when they realise it's causing too much traffic issues? Chop down more trees and widen the roads? Please let's have some sense and reject this application outright.

xxxxxxxx, London

Stuart Bowden, East Horsley
The HGV traffic along the Byfleet Rd is already very heavy all day, every day, (Tesco depot etc.) - adding more to it makes no sense at all.

Ben Cruickshank, Addlestone
This proposal Sucks!

Richard Michael Armstrong, London

Helen Booker, Weybridge
Health and environmental impact of such a development so close to many populated areas.

Stacey Tanner,

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

C Morley, Cobham
Incinerators produce fine particles in the furnace. Even with modern particle filtering of the flue gases, a small part of these is emitted to the atmosphere. PM2.5 is not separately regulated in the European Waste Incineration Directive, even though they are repeatedly correlated spatially to infant mortality in the UK (M.Ryan's ONS data based maps around the EfW/CHP waste incinerators at Edmonton, Coventry, Chineham, Kirklees and Sheffield).[44][45][46] Under WID there is no requirement to monitor stack top or downwind incinerator PM2.5 levels.[47] Several European doctors associations (including cross discipline experts such as physicians, environmental chemists and toxicologists) in June 2008 representing over 33,000 doctors wrote a keynote statement directly to the European Parliament citing widespread concerns on incinerator particle emissions and the absence of specific fine and ultrafine particle size monitoring or in depth industry/government epidemiological studies of these minute and invisible incinerator particle size emissions.[48]
Local communities are often opposed to the idea of locating waste processing plants such as incinerators in their vicinity (the Not In My Back Yard phenomenon). Studies in Andover, Massachusetts strongly correlated 10% property devaluations with close incinerator proximity.[49]
Prevention, waste minimisation, reuse and recycling of waste should all be preferred to incineration according to the waste hierarchy. Supporters of zero waste consider incinerators and other waste treatment technologies as barriers to recycling and separation beyond particular levels, and that waste resources are sacrificed for energy production.[50][51][52]

Terry Gardener, Banstead
the estimated fallout zone is grossly understated in my opinion, in recent weeks we in the UK have been affected by noxious fumes from France! ....

Renata Buchanan, Harrow

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

jordan13sicsj,
wbPubuIfvbG [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11[/url] wkDkbhLkzsF [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 Bred[/url] wzJiljFqfuP [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 Breds[/url] wtQzsoXnpwZ [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Bred 11s[/url] additionally sign on all by yourself at any local wellness- you have to thats is actually nessicary. please don't cease eating sugars, they help your system characteristic. but nonetheless,but nevertheless,on the contrary let us accept it- not every one of us is able to afford the site. Cole Haan Nike Air shoes or boots provides you with the comfort in regards to sneaker with the feel of a classical wedding gown shoe. until recently tiring sports shoes implement that require feet might be awkward or usually blistered on the end through the day. Cole Haan has brought greater to do with Nike runners in which to loafers, shoes and also of techniques that situated online or in any associated with merchants,

jordan13kdsek,
wzTwyxItvfW [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11[/url] wzVjfwPcrvZ [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 Bred[/url] wvPyxoVtleS [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 Breds[/url] waOdzgSlxoJ [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Bred 11s[/url] potassium is important mineral which helps to keep your body carrying out work thoroughly. not only does blood potassium help to keep up with the fluid rates on your body jointly helps parts of your muscles producing and also soul growing. lacking the necessary blood potassium in what you eat you may feel lots of bothersome unintended effects among carved cramping pains to weakness that will help unnatural heartrate diarrhea.

jordan13tbvpe,
wnUvenRlztA [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11[/url] wdHvfgKdjnV [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan Retro 11[/url] woGmgjToreY [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 2013[/url] wmFaayZpjrM [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Bred 11s[/url] these kinds of damaging is afflicted with end up as the substantive guitar lessons i designed to allow us grasp outcomes of the autumn, so you can easliy out our-self into your upcoming capabilities offered by the forthcoming alter towards a new age. perform correctly is not overstressed. We pick these types of unpleasant conditions for our financial growth and also can be inside of the home in graduating of their final results.

wfJuovH, Port Orange
wyToekZntxS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/hermes.html]エルメス[/url] wjEhyqLscbW [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/hermes.html]エルメス 財布[/url] wxQqxlSoiwH [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/hermes.html]エルメス バッグ[/url] wzYuvdLworC [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/hermes.html]エルメス バーキン[/url]
wvDekhIpdmO [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]シャネル[/url] wmRnjkAupjT [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]シャネル 財布[/url] wgQbujZaltX [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]シャネル バッグ[/url] whBzciEqqhD [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]chanel 財布[/url] wnOyqbGyjcX [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]chanel[/url] wcRujdLiuqS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]chanel バッグ[/url]
wiWwjjPssaI [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ルイヴィトン[/url] wcNcjuDcpnN [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ヴィトン[/url] weKofwQbfyX [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ルイヴィトン 財布[/url] wtBwzeZzylR [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ヴィトン 財布[/url] wbDhkzPormZ [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ヴィトン バッグ[/url] whZtcyEyrvS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ルイヴィトン バッグ[/url] wkUxkySpufS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ヴィトン 長財布[/url] woRxqiRxifQ [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ルイヴィトン 長財布[/url]
wrDuzkQuyrO [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ[/url] wwHmcvRhvqL [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ 財布[/url] wbDtuwLblcE [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]coach 財布[/url] wmLnupVewgA [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ アウトレット[/url] woMatyTguuF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]coach アウトレット[/url] wqLyldVbomN [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ バッグ[/url] wjNysxKjkkF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]coach バッグ[/url] wqKfzqXybsN [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ 長財布"[/url]
wgXaodOzkkK [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]アディダス[/url] wcIhriRbczY [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]adidas originals[/url] waJjhcBtxlS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]adidas[/url] wcPuohJqbbM [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]アディダス スニーカー[/url] waGjpuNmxwA [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]アディダス オリジナルス[/url]
wrQtaeAfazU [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ[/url] wkQwtxCgvlE [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]prada[/url] wyVseiHvaqG [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ 財布[/url] whVpnwOqbwF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]prada 財布[/url] wnDkteQqfoG [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ バッグ[/url] wmBrimGwfvB [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ 公式[/url] wcPkviFaugO [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ アウトレット[/url] wpSeqyFhimT [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]prada バッグ[/url] wyRpliXxjcL [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ 長財布[/url]
wsIfmhXlwcJ [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]クロエ[/url] weOoubYilfU [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]クロエ 財布[/url] wyMwvyBcksK [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]クロエ バッグ[/url] wxCkypBthkV [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]クロエ 店舗[/url] wiPslhNudeA [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]バレンシアガ[/url] wrTdzvEkvlU [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]バレンシアガ バッグ[/url] wdCwujZbpcQ [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]バレンシアガ 財布[/url] wpGihxUncfU [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]バレンシアガ 店舗[/url]
wkKdqyAcreI [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトン[/url] wbIfotSplsC [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトン[/url] wxNrvnVyafR [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトン 財布[/url] wgWqtmRmjcD [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトン 財布[/url] wdKgrtRcbjG [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトン バッグ[/url] woBoqaNepcD [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトン バッグ[/url] wtHcmsCfmaE [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトン公式[/url] wtOncsNhnsF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトン公式[/url] wwRpshJcymT [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトンコピー[/url] wvLbklGuavC [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトンコピー[/url]

やっぱり女の子はこうでなくっちゃね！という夢のようなシーン
【東京エリア】
スクウェア・エニックスは、2013年3月24日18時より開催されるプレイステーション3版『コール オブ デューティ ブラックオプスII』の全国大学対抗戦 決勝トーナメントにおいて、Twitterを用いた優勝チーム予想キャンペーンを実施するpixivにて『TOMB RAIDER（トゥームレイダー）』をテーマとしたファンアートコンテストが開催スタート【ファミ通EE】
【エコバッグ】【ホールフーズ】アメリカセレブご愛用エコバッグ！【Whole Foods Market】ホールフーズマーケットオリジナルエコバッグシェリル・クロウデザインのショッピングバッグ 05P14jun10
コサージュ＆持ち手付きのかご！クラフトペーパーバンド（100円キット）

wbMhrnA, Little Rock
wnAxekNvqjU [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] weCqgqWlrsJ [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8[/url] wpWxitJeyxK [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 For Sale[/url] woNkwaPzanH [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan Retro 8[/url] wdYwjlIvnuC [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wtFxydLqvtE [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 2013[/url]
wyXrdqNirqI [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wmTlomPzkjC [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8[/url] wmLknrTnkjN [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wcHxljBxsuJ [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Jordan Retro 8[/url] wcPaxiQvfeG [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wpBxtwFjolL [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 2013[/url]
wwDoglMdkxI [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wrQrveJegyM [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8[/url] wrZywuZjtlY [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wnRrhfKkcxY [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wiYeccOlvhN [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan Retro 8[/url] wzRzupKkieO [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wtVxlvMvjzF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 2013[/url]
wxYwxnWqgpI [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wsUjwiLmhxP [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8[/url] wpDgrvEdomH [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wzAjaxXcxkY [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wdHssyUlrtR [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan Retro 8[/url] whCczoAzikI [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wwYyzvHampW [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 2013[/url] wzEgbmTwaaC [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Cheap Jordan 8[/url]
the instant one first derives passion for knitting, if feels like it is a hobby in which fabrics, such as wool, Reigns superior. by all means, yarn is the material that is employed for knitting, But massive, As the worldwide internet has now enlarged, accordingly possesses the knitting field. The wool for the spare time pursuit knitter enters more alternatives prior to now; a great deal more that when take a moment to one type of yarn - although for many different indicators and so colourings - had as replacements.

Jordan 11 Bred ntgyn,
drink simultaneously stops excess fat intake, meaning that they just don't get the fat-soluble nutritional vitamins who they need. Alcoholics could be missing in nutritional products A, d, u, b and moreover nited kingdom. every one of these nutritional vitamin supplements are expected for hurt healing in cellphone vehicle repairs and this means that alcoholics usually tend to bruise instead heal shortly as,

[url=http://www.ejglobal.com/blog.php?do=showone&type=blog&cid=9&itemid=204611]pJlfzG[/url]
[url=http://rangdou.219.xuelon.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1137100]rEgmvM[/url]
[url=http://www.dforever.cn/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=475692&extra=]kAxzmI[/url]
[url=http://www.vvyahoo.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=261588]gKgkiL[/url]
[url=http://www.hue23.com/apps.php?q=diary&a=detail&did=914223&uid=145753]yTzmmS[/url]
[url=http://www.baiduyishouji.com/thread-15641-1-1.html]mPudjZ[/url]
[url=http://novadental.com.mk/all-white-foamposites-4o0f14]dIoptZ[/url]
[url=http://www.credit-times.com/bbs//forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2094854&extra=]hJwbpO[/url]
[url=http://www.geihuituan.com/luntan/viewthread.php?tid=75974&extra=]gMcixK[/url]
[url=http://22090.com/]iBzbnG[/url]
[url=http://approvideo.org/]wZcmkF[/url]
[url=http://www.xiaolanhai.com/thread-8311-1-1.html]jOqaiJ[/url]
[url=http://www.bjzhishang.com/forum/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1740684]gAxfsU[/url]
[url=http://zhongmele.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=835]aZnfhB[/url]
[url=http://www.pacraftbeer.com/pacbforums/topic.php?id=17613&replies=1#post-18159]nJvvnV[/url]
[url=http://vbook.1000v.cn/sexapp/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=930349]rSqegE[/url]
[url=http://www.masonworld.com/running-b2evolution-multiple-blogs-multiple-domains-one-install-shared-host/]uIzvsP[/url]
[url=http://bq.likelai.com.cn/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2451381]iVkmwC[/url]
[url=http://www.ylmsy.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=72934]fCivsJ[/url]
[url=http://ptfbc.org/?q=node/367#comment-300461]bWxpfI[/url]

Janina, Boyertown
Remarkable! Its actually awesome post, I have got much clear idea regarding from this piece of writing.

Franklyn, Banjup
We're a gaggle of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with useful information to work on. You have performed a formidable task and our entire group will likely be thankful to you.

Dean, Siebnen
My partner and I stumbled over here coming from a different website and thought I should check things out. I like what I see so now i'm following you. Look forward to going over your web page again.

Fletcher, Guinadi
Greetings! Quick question that's entirely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My site looks weird when browsing from my iphone. I'm trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to correct this issue. If you have any recommendations, please share. Thanks!

Melaine, Groede
My family members always say that I am wasting my time here at web, however I know I am getting familiarity everyday by reading such good articles or reviews.

hjzdfoit, Bedford
[url=http://www.manotickgardens.com/assets/index.htm]Michael kors sale[/url] This may be why a physical deterrent, such as a deer fence, may be the most effective way to keep deer out of the yard. [url=http://www.chaussuresjordanfrance.com]Chaussures jordan[/url] Ijajibkwu [url=http://www.caryma.com]windows 7 product key[/url]
ljqore 569917 [url=http://www.gabinogs.com]windows 7 key[/url] 246196 [url=http://www.petersaul.com.au/gfx/michaelkors.html]Michael kors on sale[/url]

Lorri, Zoetermeer
An impressive share! I've just forwarded this onto a coworker who has been conducting a little research on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast due to the fact that I discovered it for him... lol. So let me reword this.... Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending some time to discuss this issue here on your site.

Lamont, Clarksdale
Hello, the whole thing is going nicely here and ofcourse every one is sharing information, that's in fact good, keep up writing.

Alexandria, Harbottle
What's up, all is going fine here and ofcourse every one is sharing facts, that's actually good, keep up writing.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
This planning needs to be properly evalusted in this Green Belt.

tony philipson, Weybridge

Philip Brown, Weybridge
There are plenty of other sites in the area eg Lyne where the incinerator could be located

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

David Wynn-Jones, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Edmund Hodgeon, Weybridge
Over our dead bodies. Many places to build this on old industrial sites in the UK. This has to be a scheme to downgrade the planning to be able to build houses and the council is going to fall right for it. Please council do not be duped by these people pretending they want to be environmentally friendly. It is a con!!!!

Ms Johnson, Cobham
Keep our Green Belt protected

xxxxxxxx, Windlesham
What a nightmare, 20 tonne HGVs on minor roads. More traffic chaos and more air pollution.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, WEYBRIDGE

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Health and safety issues, wildlife issues, green belt- easy decision NO to the incinerator. Green Belt laws must be enforced by the County.

Reg Heath, Weybridge

Alice Duff,

Thelma Ager, Hullbridge, Essex
Why polute the air around Hampton Court, Wisley and Cobham when there are other brown field sites further away from popular visited areas.

Louise Gomez, Rochford

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I cannot believe that this project should have been allowed to come this far! This is a populated residential area with many people leaving more polluted areas closer to London to enjoy better quality of life, including clean air. This project will destroy the area with respect to air quality, traffic and as a result noise. This cannot be allowed to proceed!

Lulu Appleton, Cobham,

Michael Appleton, Cobham, Surrey

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Lets protect our greenbelt!

Ilya Katsnelson,

Lucy Hayward, Weybridge
I have serious concerns about health issues, an increase in traffic in an already congested traffic blackspot, the environmental impact and the erosion of green belt land arising in connnection with the proposed incinerator.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Has anyone considered the effect on the numerous schools in the area? Long term consequences on council and the owners of the incinerators? Has the council learnt nothing from the past?

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybrudge

xxxxxxxx, hersham
350 children at school less than 1 mile away - does the council really want to battle legal issues for years to come - this is a potential health issue for these children and their families

Peter Morley,

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Amanda Kesterton, Weybridge
I believe this development will prove to be an irresponsible development and devastating to all life in its near vicinity.

Mr D.A.SHARPE, Weybridge

Terry Williams, Walton on Thames
Detrimental effect on childrens health.Building on green belt.Danger from large lorries.Completely unsuitable in an area of natural beauty.Traffic congestion.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Leeve this area alone please

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I oppose the planning application

Barbara Wardle, Hersham

R.A.Dawes,

Alicia Harris, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Ian/ Plumb, Walton on Thames
It sounds like anothe cockied idea forom this govenment and I hope the petittion will presuade them to another of their U turns.

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Why has our MP not said anything yet! Typical.

Eleanor Mrgan Bearne, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Woking
I called SCC to complain about the lack of tranparency about this planning application and the fact that there plenty of Brownfield sites in other locations far away from the residential mass that is surrounding this proposed site. SCC seemed more concerned in stonewalling me. As a result of which I am insensed by their attitude. This would be a disaster for the whole area and a reckless and irrisponsible act on the part of SCC if it is allowed to go ahead. It must be popposed by everyone who resides in the surrounding area and countryside (Green Belt)

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Thanks for being so open about this SCC...not. This whole things sums you up really - bravo and well done for your excellent guardianship of this part of Surrey. Anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together can see how impractical this area is in regards to already high traffic, due to an industrial estate at Brooklands, and the number of people living here.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Tames

Coral Laird, Weybridge
Signing to save the local environment.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
Save our green belt

sarah brown, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
No thank you !

Simon Kay, Walton On Thames

Jason Marcus McCabe, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Jenny Dalton,

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames
Inappropriate development in the wrong place

Kevin Holding,

Robert James,

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This a health hazzard to everyone in the area and a disgusting way to use green belt land in surrey

Sandi Beaumont, Weybridge
This greenbelt area features high residency, is one of natural beauty featuring a large wood, riding centre, and golf club, a purpose built Care home residency and the local council, for profit, want to destroy this area by putting a totally unnecessary incinerator. there are heaps of brown belt / industrial areas where this could be situated. Think again, Elmbridge, This is a totally unsuitable site.

V. Murphy, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, esher

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Peter Jenner, Byfleet
This will increase pollution and disruption to residents We must protect our green belt

xxxxxxxx, Derry City
A health hazzard to everyone in the surrounding area and a disgusting misuse of green belt land in Surrey. Plenty of alternative Brown sites readily available for this scheme. This has to be the proper option, Use up existing brown field sites. Please do not let these fools rob our country of evermore green land sites. We have to balance and redress decades of infastructure damage and unused brown field sites. left as eyesores dotted around our country. Greenbelt land should never be wasted in such a manner as in the past. Thank Again!!!!!

J P Murphy, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
NO BIOMASS INCINERATOR!!! This is Green Belt Land!

Paul Merry,

Nick Taylor,
Surely a more remote site should be considered away from established communities? The Council's analysis of sites should be reviewed carefully.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Ian Picken, GODALMING

xxxxxxxx, Weybrige

EDWARD Sharp, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This area has numerous schools, congested roads and a substantial population. It is completely wrong to pollute the air further - surely the effects of aircraft, commuting and the M25 is enough....

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Jackie Sharp,

Celia Gregory, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Please consider the health and safety issues for children and their families relating to such development of the area. Our greenbelt areas should also be protected.

brian eastwood, walton on thames

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Must protect the green belt.

Paul Abbott, Byfleet
I am fully opposed to this project. Spend some time in the area and look at the current traffic problem. This will add to the problem and add other pollution, despite claims to the contrary. NO NO NO NO!

Richard Starr, Esher

Anna McGuinness, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher
This is not really an issue of whether Cobham itself is an appropriate place for such an incinerator, as they should not be built anywhere. The idea of zero emissions is nonsense - there will be a lot of Carbon Dioxide emitted, and it will be impossible to scrub all Dioxins from the emissions too. It is really hard to understand what Elmbridge Council are thinking here, unless it is a planning ploy as suggested by another signatory.

anna craig-wood, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Paulina McGroarty, Esher

xxxxxxxx,

simon soutar, weybridge

Ingrid O\'Leary, Byfleet Surrey

xxxxxxxx, ESHER

xxxxxxxx, East Molesey

marc o\'leary, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, East Molesey
Not on my own doostep but clearly unjustified development within the precious Surrey green belt

Daniel Talenejad, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is a ridiculous idea

Mrs A Mutafyan,

xxxxxxxx, surbiton
I have 4 grandchildren living in the area

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton
Byfleet Road is normally a dangerous traffic nightmare already and relief road for the M25 when that is closed, without adding constant new large waste vehicles, and outside of any ecological concerns for the population of the area due to the nature of the proposed site.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on thames
I live very near this, there are many schools nearby, riding stables, and loads of wildlife, all to be killed because of this. Do not ruin our community for something dangerous, there are many towns, and social activities, that will soon be put to harm because of this. NO please DO NOT make this horrible device

Karen Seymour, Oxshott

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Robert Shatwell, Woking

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Green Belt, health hazard, massive congestion issues, school less than a mile away. How many more reasons do you need to realise this is not suitable land.

D.L. Wilson, Weybridge

Jeremy Bates, Oxshott

Janine Ganter, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Roz Williams, BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Wrong project at the wrong place.

Dr Anne Appleton,

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
I agree with the letter

val humphreys,

Tim Ransley,

D.Bandari, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Kim Pang, Oxshott

Catherine Fowler, Weybridge
The impact of such a development on air quality and already severe traffic congestion in the area would be horrible. This is a very built-up area and a gasification incinerator would adversely affect the quality of life of many, many locals.

W N Fowler, Weybridge
The air quality is already dangerously poor in this area. The incinerator will only make it worst.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Helen Lawry, Weybridge

Julia Lofthouse, Esher

xxxxxxxx, London

Keith Springall,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is anti-social irresponsible madness !,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Please Mr Councillor come to your senses!!

Kevin Gregory, Byfleet
Definately a NO. I want to Enjoy the wildlife and cleaner air here. There are other alternatives to Incineration.

Stuart Cole, Windlesham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames, Surrey

Julia Gilchist, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, West byfleet
Our children deserve better

Greg Downs,

Lisa Rowe,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Concerned about health issues from emission

Shlomo Dowen, Mansfield

Natalia Zenina, Weybridge
We can't believe they are going to spoil the best place in Surrey! Certainely there are a lot of places they could do it without so great harm. Just search around better!

Gwyneth Gomes, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Martin Young, Byfleet

Michelle Gomes,

Fiona Houghton, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Lower Kingswood
Unacceptable and harmful development in the green belt.

xxxxxxxx, Crawley

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Already very crowded roads leading to and from the A3 / M25, and too close to golf courses / horse riding areas.

Tatjana orlova, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Brigid Michael, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Joyce Jabamoney, Walton-on-Thames
Please consider the health issues and the impact on young children. Why the council is so keen to destroy an area of natural beauty?

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
xxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton
Absolutely wrong place. This is a green belt. Brown belt/industrial areas are obviously more appropriate. Roads not prepared for heavy traffic (HGVs).

Ian Gomes, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

Elizabeth Thompson, Byfleet

Lisa Shone, Cobham
We have 3 children and do not wish their health to be affected by breathing in toxic emissions

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
NO any gasification incinerators in our green belt area!

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Stop a new sourses of dioxins in Surrey!

Jonathan Brookes, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

Katie Weller, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Find a brown field site. Not an appropriate location at all. Traffic, health etc

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Natalie Herbert, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybride

GLORIA BOSQUE ESPALLARGAS, SURBITON

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

David Harvey, Weybridge

Elizabeth Vickery, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Planning permission was refused for a local school to expand onto a small strip of protected land. How can SCC possibly justify their actions if they go ahead and approve this application?

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

Lesley Dolphin, Byfleet

Sarah Rabett, Weybridge
This is a green belt area with many schools in the area so is not suitable for a waste incinerator.

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Elisa Everitt, Weybridge

Michael Tripp, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Naveeda Mitchell, Weybridge
This is a bit close to populated areas - there must be areas that are in the middle of farmland not used, for whatever reason where there is no housing and people living close by?

Mrs Debbie Trievnor, Weybridge
Yet another attack on Green Belt land and an unacceptable risk to public health. Just say no!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Too many risks

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone
Possibly the worst idea I have heard in a long time. Interesting to see they are building an old peoples home on the Redhilll Road - don't the old folk count any more?

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Hahahah I'd have loved to be a fly on the wall in the 30 second SCC meeting with the guy who proposed this. "We'd like to build an incinerator next to thousands of school children and among heritage sites and green belt. Now I know this may sound pretty unappealing.. BUT, wait till you hear this! It'll make all involved millions a year".

KAREN HIGGINS, Weybridge

DAVID HIGGINS, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Should be located away from any built up area, industrial site would be better and probably already have better access.

Lucy Sadler, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Waltonn on Thames

leslie burrage, Burwood Park
Protect our Green Belt and the health of our children by resiting in less populated area. The weight of extra traffic will only add to the serious congestion on local roads.
We dispair that the proposal has reached this far!!

Tom Culverwell, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
This area is congested enough and we have already had a motorway service station forced upon us. No thank you!

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, WEYBRIDGE

Steve Sampson, Cobham

Robert King, Weybridge

Kristian Eklo, Cobham

Sharron Eklo, Cobham

H Baker,

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, cobham

Diane Gray, addlestone
Make current sites more efficient. Incinuration should be last resort. Not first option!

xxxxxxxx,

Jane Chrysostomou,

xxxxxxxx, Stoke d\\'Abernon
Think of the children !

Olaf Eklo, Cobham
Not really thought trough by the politicans in relation to schools nearby, traffic in Brooklands Road and the environmental consequences.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

clive moore, weybridge

keith adams, Weybridge
No Incinerator Please

John G G Williams,

June Kay Retter, Weybridge

Tracie Sampson,

Ellen Eklo, Cobham
We have to look after our Green Belt. Please stop it!

Lindsay Bould, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
The infrastructure around this area cannot cope as it stands with the traffic problems that are already way beyond the areas capability, also Redhill Road is nearly an impossible junction at peak periods so no thought has gone into the traffic management. The effect on people and their families health could be horrendous. The argument that this is a green form of energy is yet again jumping on a band wagon of unproven going green policies (Wind turbines). If this is to go ahead as a council I hope you have enough money for the claims culture in ten - twenty years time.

sandra boutell, West Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher
There are plenty of other places to build this. It is dangerous in a heavily residential area.

Phil Golding, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, East Horsley,

xxxxxxxx, caterham

Judith Ratcliffe, Weybridge
We need to protect our Green belt and stop this and potential gravel and aggregates re-cycling plans for the weybridge area.

john Dewar, byfleet

nicola boutell, byfleet
I am opposed to this planning application

Thomas Luke Ransley, Weybridge
Keep the green belt!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Yasir Noorani, weybridge
no way , already a very heavy load of HGvs on the byfleet road , plus many other sites to built incinerator why choose a residential area.

David howell, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx,

Mrs Gay Bottrill, Byfleet
In addition to the relevant objects the increased road traffic in be unbearable and, in cases of an emergency, may well cause dangerous delays.

Earle Bottrill, Byfleet
iN ADDITION TO THE RELEVANT OBJECTIONS THE INCREASED ROAD TRAFFIC WILL CAUSE UNBEARABLE TIME WASTE AND FRUSTRATIONS AND POSSIBLY IN CASES OF AN EMERGENCY DANGEROUS AND POSSIBLY FATAL DELAYS.

jennifer parkin, byfleet
Too much traffic on our roads environmentally unfriendly and too near houses there must be somewhere where it is not so built up. The byfleet road has so much traffic it is madness to consider anymore. Are Elmbridge Borough Council being paid huge amounts of money for this because I cannot think if any other reason why they would consider this scheme.

Ian D. Maidment,

Janice Franks, WALTON-ON-THAMES
The location is completely unsuitable for such a venture - the additional traffic, both HGVs making deliveries, and from people travelling to the area will rely on small local roads, which are already under severe strain from the current traffic.

J Gorton,
Is there not enough pollution I this area from the motorways and the electricity pilons?!?!? What is going to be the impact on Wisley and painshill parks that are working so hard at conservation of plants etc

Stephen JOHN, WEYBRIDGE

Mike Paddonj, Weybridge

Louise Sandford, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, byfleet
Can't believe that this facility has to be built here - my children will be going to the school nearby.

Frank Horder, Weybridge

June Hall, Cobham
The material should be processed where produced, not moving it to green belt land with the consequential heavy lorry congestion and polution on populated minor roads.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
This type of activity cannot be classed as environmentally friendly and ought to be undertaken in an industrialised area rather than Green Belt. Additionally Byfleet Road (A245) is already overly busy with all of the trucks going to and coming from Brooklands. The added volume of traffic created by the incinerator could only exacerbate the problem.

Peter Jarvis,

Renate Heath, Weybridge

Paul Ivatts, Weybridge
I can't think of a more unsuitable site for this sort of activity, lets hope common sense prevails.

Torsten Alexander, Cobham

Dudley Heath, Weybridge
We already get lots of smoke from people burning garden rubbish because they do not want to pay for the Brown bins, which is extremely annoying on a hot summer's day when you have to shut your windows. Adding this incinerator is the final straw.

CLIVE NEWMAN, COBHAM
JUST LIKE THE DOWNSIDE M25 SERVICES - ANOTHER UNWANTED DEVELOPMENT THE AUTHORITIES ARE TRYING TO FOIST UPON US - OF NO PRACTICAL VALUE TO LOCAL RESIDENTS AND IN FACT JUST THE OPPOSITE - AN ENVIRONMENTAL NOOSE!

Martin Major, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
Unimaginable that this can be allowed so close to schools, homes and recreational facilities.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Mrs Harveen Dhillon, New Haw
I am against this incinerator.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Impact on healh, traffic and greenbelt. A project like this shows the inconsistencies with which the council treats our greenbelt.

xxxxxxxx, Surrey

Sophie Walker, Byfleet
Far to close to highly populated areas and places of beauty. The traffic is already very bad in the local area so adding to this will cause further stress on the infrastructure. I am sure there are other sites that could be utilised which would prevent less impact on the local environment and population.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Bori, Byfleet

Alan Hardman, Weybridge

Brigita Vaskelyte, Cobham

Kristina Chiganova, Cobham

Josie Precious, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Gary Street, Addlestone

Helen Russell, Weybridge
Let's not destroy the green belt and instead evaluate other options within the region. There must be other alternatives which would protect our green belt.

Samantha Wallis, WEST BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Ridiculous choice of site. Green belt must be protected.

Helen Golding,

AlanFreer, Byfleet
There is enough HGV traffic already in this area - NO MORE!!!!!!!!!!

Z Pinchbeck, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
These things are for industrial sites, not rural green belt.

Tracy Wright, cobham

Gary Jones, Byfleet
If it does go ahead, they should re open the RED HIll road entrance from the A3/M25 roundabout, thus reducing some of the traffic.

Patricia Jones, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Fetcham
Soot emitted by incomplete combustion of fossil fuel and biomass, increases the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease.

bonnie-charlotte parker, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I am totally disgusted that such an application can even be made and proposed to Surrey County Council. Independent research clearly shows that gassification emits toxins. There is no economic or ecological justification for such a plant on Redhill Road. It will not benefit the local economy and in fact will devastate the lives of thousands of people for years to come and will destroy communities and the flora and fauna of the Greenbelt area. Why not allow the construction of a detached house on the plot instead?

Ingrid massie, Gomshall

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

ALISON LEE, BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I am afraid this does look like the first move in a classic property development/planning scheme. Bad in itself, but with much worse future implications...

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Outrageous to propoose this in such a built up area

Simon England, Weybridge

James England, Walton on Thames

Judith Doyle, Cobham

Keith Alvey, Esher
I wish this objection the very, very best of luck.

Sonia Duggan, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Ian Woodthorpe, London

xxxxxxxx,
Clean air is clearly not a priority for this 'Green Belt'.

Did you know that the Silvermere Haven Pet Cemetary has recently erected a 6 metre additional incinerator tower without planning permission that the council have decided to 'turn a blind eye to'?

Now the incinerator a mile away.

Nothing surprises me.

Clean air and principle are clearly not a priority to the council.

In closing. Dont hold your breathe. But the likely outcome is that you will have to, the air will be so foul.

wade pollard, west byfleet
This is Green Belt and this biomass could be burnt, instead of coal, at existing power stations around the country such as Drax etc which are looking for more sources of this material

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
See "Closing of Redhill Road" from the A3 when Brooklands Commercial area was developed. Road unsuitable for heavy trucks. If we have to have these sites - why in high density areas?

Matthew Baxter, Weybridge
Cannot believe SCC is this dumb. There must be more to it, like and slightly less catastrophic option that we will agree to in order to make this one go away.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Simon connolly, West horsley

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Paul Barnes, Walton on Thames

Robert Evans, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton On Thames
I use this area all the time, shopping, golf, visiting freinds and family, etc, etc and find that it is busy enough without the threat of additional heavy goods vehicles and the impact it may have on my peace of life.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Ridiculous! The traffic on the Byfleet road is already ablsolute torture and this proposal would see more big lorries on this route. Apart from the health issues for families living locally, the idea of allowing delvelopement of green belt is outrageous.

xxxxxxxx,
Another location should be found for this. Redhill Rd/Byfleet Rd already too much traffic. Plus do not need added polution from an incinerator from an already heavily populated area.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is Green Belt!

xxxxxxxx, Weybrodge

Penny Hoskyn, West Byfleet
This must not be allowd. Green belt land, a populated residential area, increased traffic on already very busy roads and above all not safe with harmful emissions from vehicles and the Plant.

Claire HOath, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Mark Ashman, Cobham
The traffic congestion on the Byfleet rd already has a negative impact on those of us who live on or close to it. Approving the waste incinerator would increase large vehicle movement. The air quality is already impacted by high levels of local, A3 and M25 traffic. Why destroy more green belt, when a significant number of brown field sites exist.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Eden Hammond,

Ruth Jones, Cobham
This is a totally inappropriate development with significant detrmental impact on the surrounding areas. This is green belt andshould be protected. The traffic on this road is already very congested.

xxxxxxxx, west byfleet
Excess HGV traffic,Pollution,Greenbelt,Uneccessary, need I go on, for goodness sake engage brains Elmbridge Council and say no.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
NO NO NO!!!

Scott, Byfleet

Robin P Voice, New Malden
Using the Name Barnes Wallis is a snub to a great man. As a regular user of the Byfleet Road, thought should be given to reducing traffic not increasing it.

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead
There are far more appropriate brown field locations for this kind of installation - once the green belt is gone it's gone for good.

moira gill, Weybridge

Konstanze Graham, Cobham

Alastair Graham, Conham
The proposed plant will have a very damaging environmental and health impact on the population of Cobham and Weybridge, particularly on children. The HGVs involved in transportation to and from the plant will cause congestion even greater than at present in the Byfleet Road and emit fumes and cause vibration to houses near this road.The planning application flouts Green Belt policy.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
You cannot build this on green belt land. We cannot allow it.

Richard Knights, Byfleet

Mavis Knights, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

David Plummer, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Surely an alternative site in a less populated area would be a better solution for all

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Godalming

Sally-Jane Palmer, Surbiton
This is far too close to the school that I work at and is a major health and safety concern for us all.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
The incinerator will be a disaster for Elmbridge

Camilla Hawkins, Weybridge
No to pollution, increased traffic and environmental impact.

Jeannette Sage, ulverston
We live in an area down wind of sellafield nuclear power station. For a small area there is a very high percentage of cancers with almost every family i know having a relative die of cancer related conditions. I fully support the petition.

E Fitzpatrick, Ashford
must be stopped, could destroy a lovely course

Chris Allen, Tadworth

xxxxxxxx, london

mark hynes, godstone

Neil Baldwin, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, New Malden

Dave Gore, Addlestone

Ray Walsh, Walton-on-Thames

Guillaume Battini, Paris
Living abroad but a regular to Silvermere, the place has such an history to protect

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Graham Neale, Bisley

Simon Gill, Marlow

xxxxxxxx, Wokingham

xxxxxxxx, Guildford

d higgs, godalming

lloyd spencer, Bisley
Why do they always have to spoil things when there is other sites and options. Green belt is important to be kept.

Derek Demuth, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, East Clandon
The HGV traffic alone will add to an already congested road in the rush hour. This is totally inappropriate in this area.

xxxxxxxx, Crawley

xxxxxxxx, Dorking
Totally unsuitable site.

j pullen, surrey
Going ahead with such a site will totally ruin Silvermere golf course. Silvermere offer a place to unwind, relax and enjoy the peaceful setting around you. The clubhouse is a excellent place to eat, soaking up the atmosphere whilst enjoying the views across the lake.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Please do not let this happen. The negative effects from acidification and from noise and air pollution will be a blight on the Cobham area.

K. Carmichael, Surbiton
Please make the correct decision... It is simply ridiulous to even think that this is a good thing!!!!

xxxxxxxx, East Clandon
This is an innappropriate use of Greenbelt land.

Wendy Cady, Woking

Paul Jemetta, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Brian Street, Midhurst
we always enjoy coming to Silvermere,it would be a crime to lose all these facilities.

xxxxxxxx, west byfleet
Don't destroy our greenbelt zone anymore, this will create more air, more road and more noise pollution !! This is already a high density area with the continuing development at Brooklands.

xxxxxxxx,

Mr Clive Rainford, Storrington
I travel from Sussex, having used Silvermere for many years when I lived in Surrey, to enjoy the first class facilities and beautiful golf course and I am astounded that this application is being considered for this lovely and historic location. As I recall the lake was used by Barnes Wallace and the M.O.D during the second world war for testing of models for the bouncing bomb. Shame on you Elmbridge Council!

Miles Couchman, Teddington
This is a beautiful part of the Surrey countryside, quite apart from being one of the most enjoyable golf courses I know around London. I am appalled at the idea of this development, and strongly oppose it.

Leigh Wells, Fleet

Julie Wells, F

xxxxxxxx, Chessington
Silvermere golf course is a wonderful course as well as the surrounding area, so please leave it alone and protect it.

Sue Barr, Leatherhead

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Apart from environmental impact, traffic on Byfleet Road is often grid-locked, so this proposal is ridiculous.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Please protect our greenbelt and the tranquility around Silvermere.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

John S Porter, EPSOM

xxxxxxxx, Twickenham
Just the problem of the additional HGV traffic in the area ought to be sufficient to squash this planning application.

Mr David Warfield, Ashford
We must protect our green space

M G Bateman, Hindhead
Unbelievable!

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

dave knight, bromley

Sophia Ghaleh-Mahmoudi, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Woking

Stephen Taylor, Petworth
Good luck, we are behind you

xxxxxxxx, WestWickham

Patrick Molloy, cobham

Ray Corstin, East Clandon

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Access by large vehicles on an already very congested road is not acceptable

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

Chris Rowell,

Jim Hains, New Malden
Not only do incinerators stink so does this decision by Elmbridge Council. Someone is benefiting and it is'nt the environment or the residents

xxxxxxxx, Tudor avenu

xxxxxxxx, Chertsey

David Jackson, Leatherhead

Steve Murphy, Croydon

xxxxxxxx, East Grinstead
This is not the right place for the incinerator and it does not sound very "green". This area is too populated for something like that.

Neil Lismorel,

xxxxxxxx, Dartford

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Has consideration been given to increased traffic on the already heavily congested Byfleet (and Seven Hills)Roads? What about the health implications for children attending schools in the surrounding areas? Have the owners of the new retirement home at the corner of Byfleet Road been consulted? Will the smoke inhalation improve the golf swing of members and visitors of St. George's Hill and Silvermere Golf Clubs???

Graham Bramhall, Downside, Cobham
We have already lost too much green belt land to the unnecessary M25 services, we can't afford to lose any more. additionally what guarantees aare there that this will not become an environmental hazard. Hans off

xxxxxxxx, Chobham
These people need to get in touch with lcoal feeling and understand that these plants are not welcome in established areas of recreation.

Bill Stone, Weybridge

Diana Isherwood Stone, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Kingston
This simply must not happen. There is already enough traffic issues in Weybridge and to add that site to the quite and clean area would be near on criminal

xxxxxxxx, Bromley

Anne S. Bjordal, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Additoional HGV traffic will cause many more delays to Byfleet Rd. which is already overloaded at times during the day. Health concerns arise from fumes.

Denise Duce, Reading

Ray Roberts, Kingston

David Williams, Wimbledon

xxxxxxxx, Camberwell

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-thames
There is a school nearby, please consider somewhere less populated.

kim buckley, crawley

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

German Yusti, Weybridge
This area is a green belt, not an industrial site, there is plenty of other places where they can establish this plan without ruining the peace, roads and environment of so many people.

Susan Rayner, Cobham
This is a totally unsuitable development for a primarily residential area and may adversely affect not only the wildlife on the golf course but surrounding nursing homes for elderly as the long term effects on health are not known.

xxxxxxxx, London

Camille Humphrey, Dorking

Gordon Frame, Windlesham
This proposed development is completely inappropriate for this location

Peter Samuel, Addlestone

Nathalie Vaughan-Smith, Cobham

Louise Goya-Perez, Weybridge

mervyn smith, cheam
This seems a ridiculous proposal to talk of green benefits when there are disgraceful consequences to an important leisure and sports facility.

ian gwyer, high wycombe

Marcia Bence, Ascot
I am disgusted that such a scheme could even be envisaged as near to a public recreation area as this is. It definitely should not be allowed to go ahead.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
The good people that built Wisley Airfield during the 2nd World War – because of its proximity to Brooklands Airfield - would turn in their graves if they knew what a blot on the beautiful Surrey landscape future greedy and selfish generations would consider building there.

At the time, Britain was united in its efforts to remain Great, and prevent the Germans from invading our green and pleasant land. Those who laboured to build the airfield would be stunned and disgusted to see their ancestors being disrespectful towards otherwise unblemished countryside.

Constructing an 80ft stack within meters of RHS Wisley Gardens - one of the most glorious and world renowned family attractions in the UK - would not only create a hideous carbuncle and eyesore, it is also likely to omit pollutants which would have a detrimental effect on the communities in the surrounding villages, and could seriously impact all the magnificent work that generations of RHS Wisley employees have laboured over to create a sustainable environment that future generations would be proud of.

Given that “sustainability” and “corporate social responsibility” are key 21st century buzzwords, I urge the developers and planning committees to be far-sighted, lead by example, and consider how proud their ancestors will be in years to come when they discover how their predecessors made the decision which preserved the charm of rural Surrey, rather than ruined it.

xxxxxxxx, Staines
D.A.Hart

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Sheer insanity combined with stupidity. Who in their own mind would design such a plant in a densely populated green belt area with thousands of school children within few miles, without mentioning the already clogged road network. Plenty of other sites. Clearly the result of some smart brainstorming from SCC. This has to be fought all the way to the national authority, further anybody resposnible for suggesting this project should be sued in a court of law...And who would ever pick a flawed design from a bankrupt design...Bad April's fool.

Caroline,

xxxxxxxx, woking
Disgusted that it is even being considred

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
We are very concerned about the proximity of the incinerator to our children's school

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Stupid place to put this thing!!!!!

Peter Dallen, Camberley

Andrew Brown, Guildford

Kevin Williams, Leatherhead
THE WRONG SITE FOR A PLANT OF THIS NATURE. IT'S GREEN BELT AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION IS BAD ENOUGH AS IT IS WITHOUT ADDING CONVOYS OF HGV'S. Elmbridge site location criteria needs re examination.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Anthony Lines, Walton-on-Thames
This will be a blight on a beautiful historic site.

xxxxxxxx, WIMBLEDON

peter michael munday, reigate
Silvermere is a beautiful golf course and would be badly affected by the proposed development and I therfore strongly object to it!!!

Nigel Paul, West Molesey

xxxxxxxx, kingston

Ingrid Monteyne, Guildford
Harmfull to green belt
Disaster to the local environment

xxxxxxxx, West Horsley

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet, Surrey
The Elmbridge area already has a high rate of asthma sufferers, including myself and other young members of my family who live in Byfleet, this will just add to pollution levels.

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
There are many schools in the vicinity of the proposed depot, (including our grandchildren's) why do we want to subject them to yet more pollution, we already have the M25 and heathrow on our doorstep.

Conie Mascarenhas, Middlesex

John Rennocks, Oxshott
The traffic in the vicinity of this proposed scheme is already horrendous for much of the day,NAND his will make it far worse by adding many heavy goods vehicles.

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead
Dont spoil the greenbelt

xxxxxxxx, London
Unbelievable, what are you thinking? The golf course will be ruined.

Shaun Schmidt, Weybridge

Brian Crook, West Byfleet
Ruin a natural site

Sally McAlister, Watford

Rachel Golding, Hersham

Gil Ben-Ari, Coulsdon
We have family in the area, including a baby grand-daughter now nearly eight months old. The pollution to the air will be unacceptable and will be carried by the wind to the surrounding area. We do not want our family subject to these air pollutants

xxxxxxxx, Horsham
A poorly thought through plan and the wrong location , we must protect greenbelt land from these type of developments

Frank Hanafin, Weybridge
This road is already grid locked every morning and evening, ridiculous idea, absolutely not!

Alan Fletcher, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This is greenbelt land. Use a more appropriate location. There are plenty of ex-MOD and brown field sites that can be used instead.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Gary Randall, byfleet
It is not a case of "not on my doorstep" but more a case of why ruin a beautiful greenbelt area.

Charles Dukes, Godalming

nikki Greig, sutton

Tony Mundy, New Haw

xxxxxxxx,

SIMON MOUNT, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Too many movements on a road that is already having a care home built right on the corner which in itself is going to cause traffic problems with movements onto a very busy road

xxxxxxxx, Hampton

A.Matthews, Petersfield

xxxxxxxx, Fleet

Maire Colohan,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Richard Hall, Addlestone
Why spoil a pleasant environment which gives exercise and pleasure to thousands of people every year. Redhill Road together with the junction with Byfleet Road is not designed for the large number of lorries which will be required to service this site.

xxxxxxxx, Epsom
There are pently of other sites where the incinerator could be located. There is no need to put it so close to many leisure facilities.

xxxxxxxx, Epsom

Brian Taylor, Woking, Surrey
This plan is a disgrace and needs thinking through more. Find somewhere in an industrialised area please.

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead

Mr.R.G.Pulley, Fleet
Do not want it wind will blow ashes all over the golf course and ruin all the greens.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
Consider the environment¬

xxxxxxxx, Woking

Alistair Whittle, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Redhill Road was closed to access from the A3 slip road some years ago presumably for traffic reasons but these proposal will cause serious problems on an already congested Byfleet Road.
The Area is Green Belt with several public footpaths crossing the area
There is conflicting research as to the safety of this operation which would make a decision to proceed dubious

Jonathan king, West byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
How exactly was this planning given? What was the nature of the lobbying? Who will be left with the clean-up bill or worse if the business fails and the developers walk away? Not convinced by the safety arguments - we do not know about the long term health effects, particularly for children. I think there is a school close by and certainly lots of families use Silvermere. How will the already congested road infrastructure cope with inevitable increase in LGVs. It would be nice if the Council for once listened to local objections, that is the point of elections and democracy.

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

JOHN SALLIS, Woodham. Addlestone
There must be a less damaging location for such a development than this. A site already used for refuse would be good

xxxxxxxx, Worcester Park

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I am extremely concerned about the health risks to my family, especially my two young children.

Emily Kidd, Pyrford

xxxxxxxx, east molesey

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Phillip Korn, Stanmore

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Not here, it's a beautiful location, there are plenty of not so naturally lovely areas such as Woking where this could be sited instead!

lee stapleton, london

xxxxxxxx, London
How many more preposterous proposals will 'planners' allow ?????

Adi Screwvala, Byfleet
This is an inappropriate development at this site which will encroach on valueable greenbelt and increase traffic on surrouding roads which are already unacceptably congested at peak times.

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames
a disgrace its got this far.

John Dabill, Guildford
This proposal simply cannot go ahead in such an area. The traffic this would cause on such small and already crowded roads. The pollution caused by the incinerator and the visual aspects of the design. How can the incompetent leaders on Surrey County Council have allowed it to get this far!! I am tired that we who live in Surrey continually have to fight these sort of insane proposals.

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
Most stupid idea of the year so far!

Vanessa Davis, walton on thames
Please stop this

Lawrence Redding, yateley
why spoil a loveley golf course

Barrie Parker, Claygate

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, ewell
please consider the golf course evn my children play there

Donna Smith, Cobham

Adam Lungley, Carshalton
This is not right, no only for the beautiful country side but also for the wildlife present in the area.

Steve Dawes, Leatherhead
We need to address the total long term commercial and environment impact of such projects before ticking the short term green energy targets.Where politics and science divide...... Nonsense and short sighted....

Wendy Pfeiffer, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, London
do not live in area but a frequent visitor to Silvermere Golf Course

xxxxxxxx, New Haw, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

Mr J Pollock, Cobham
Not a good idea...

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

xxxxxxxx, London
I will absolutely say NO for the incinerator plant. Please protect GREEN belt.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Mary Bond, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, Bracknell

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Building this in a heavily populated area where traffic congestion is already a major problem is madness. There are plenty of sites with easier access, away from densely residential areas. Very unhappy at the prospect of increased traffic pollution, let alone the pollution from the incinerator itself.

Paul Gowers, Guildford

xxxxxxxx, Woking

d cosh, walton on thames
this is a mad place to build this near old folks home a school and recreation land

xxxxxxxx, woodham
Traffic in area is alreday unacceptable and enviornmental impact over a heavily populated areas and green belt needs to be reviewed

xxxxxxxx, London
It would be such a pity to see the beauty of Silvermere and its surrounding areas blighted by effects of industry. It would seem to me that there are alternative locations away from an area many people use as easy access to enjoy nature and quiet time.

Sarah Blackman, Godalming

xxxxxxxx, Gt Bookham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Tony Ahmet, Carshalton
This would not only be a disaster for Silvermere Golf but for all local residents.

David Parsons, Weybridge
Who are the ridiculous prople who draw up such schemes for an area of outstanding beauty? I imagine they do not live locally so it is either crass stupidity or envy.

xxxxxxxx, Kingston

xxxxxxxx, London
A wonderful public golfing facility which should not be sabotaged in such a way. This is purely from the stance of the golf club, let alone the adverse traffic effect it will have on a beautiful area of Surrey.

Mark Rust, Bracknell
i love silvermere its a heavenly place, to build a waste incinerator is a disaster it musn't happen

Mrs Susan Chapple, Weybridge
This incinerator would be a major health hazard to this area

xxxxxxxx, Woking

u rohtlaan, walton-on-thames
Why spoil peoples leasure time

xxxxxxxx, Woking
Golf should not be played next to any noise making facilities. it should be a peaceful area for relaxation and enjoyment. this proposal is set to ruin that which in turn will lead to a decrease in golf at Silvermere, in turn possible leading to job losses.

Chris Yates, Cobham

xxxxxxxx,

Andrew Barrowman, Claygate, Esher
Awful idea!

Sarah Paterson, Byfleet

Jane Newell, Woking

xxxxxxxx, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Laleham
This area of greenbelt must be protected. Do not let this development take place

xxxxxxxx, Caterham

xxxxxxxx, Effingham

Ian Tozer, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Dorking

Kevin Chamberlain, Crowthorne

xxxxxxxx, walton-on-thames
please no incinerator

Michael Lee, Guildford
Outrageous!Beautiful site.Totally wrong site for incinerator

xxxxxxxx, Hampton

xxxxxxxx, Teddington

xxxxxxxx, Chertsey

Colin Barwick, West Molesey
Dont ignore this petition like you did in Anne Way, West Molesey

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Peter Davies, London

Ann Nicholls, Frimley

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Ralph Sutton, North End House
This project will destroy a green belt area of natural beauty with respect to air quality, traffic and noise.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

a mackenzie, london

xxxxxxxx, Shepperton
Investigation into a similar development in Charlton village (near Shepperton) has proved that these incinerators are far from green. Do SCC or Government care? Clearly not. If you value your green areas and health object. You can only defeat this by active campaign and weight of numbers petitioning. Mad positioning in what is already a dense traffic area.

Ruth Quinn, Esher

mick gordon, epsom
the surrounding roads already struggles with the volume of traffic without adding so much more HGV vehicles.

Robin Byers, London
This is a monstrous disregard for the health & safety of a sizeable population of human beings not rabbits including children. The effect upon local house prices will impact heavily.This site has clearly been chosen for its convenience for the HGV's etc further exacerbating the traffic on a relatively busy road WITH COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR USERS & LOCAL INHABITANTS. Gases & smells will inevitably escape and don't believe the project engineers.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

KARE N CROMPTON, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This area is not suitable for the incinerator because there are so many childrens living within affected area. This is not a concern about a health issue but also a promised green belt in this area.

John Cook, Ascot

xxxxxxxx, Haywards Heath
I work in Leatherhead & regularly visit Silvermere & am stunned at the thought this development could even be considered on such a beautiful site, the roads are busy enough around the area, find an industrial site to build this!

xxxxxxxx, Chertsey

Samantha Burgess, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, New Malden

Jane Fox, Caterham
Protect the green belt!

xxxxxxxx, Ripley

Elliot Kutner, Redhill

Jim Tuck, Walton on Thames
I believe that green space should be protected from this kind of development and that the enjoyment of Silvermere users such as myself would be significantly reduced due to noise pollution and reduced air quality. In addition, egress from Redhill Road on to the A245 is already a difficult process and the addition of numerous heavy and slow moving vehicles will undoubtedly cause more accidents and increase congestion.

xxxxxxxx, Feltham
I play golf at Silvermere regularly and if this is built i will have to seriously consider playing there again.

Charlie Vaughan-Griffith,
Poorly thought out. protect the greenbelt - there must be more suitable industrial sites over the UK. Common sense please.

xxxxxxxx, Egham

Corinne, Cobham

A. Simonyan, Hersham
This must be a terrible joke, a pollution disaster in the centre of natural beauty? Of course we say - NO! Think about the health of our children - PLEASE!

richard stevens, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Southwood, Farnborough
This plan needs to be reconsidered, especially as Silvermere promotws wildlife within it's grounds. This area is classed as greenbelt and needs to remain as greenbelt

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Completely the wrong location for an incinerator. Think about the impact on the countryside, animals and people.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I moved out of central London to give my young family a better, healthier quality of life. This proposal has not been well thought out - in no way is a "green" option when you take into account increased air pollution, traffic and noise pollution...setting aside the obvious eyesore. This must not go ahead.

Christina Zandona, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Dave Hughes, Guildford

Neil Brown, Byfleet

Petra Langen-Pieters, Addlestone

k hicks, surbiton
As a member of staff at silvermere ec i strongly object to the incineration plant due to health & safety issues and its innappropriate placement on the greenbelt.

t j hicks, surbiton
I Strongly object to the gasification plant asi travel to silvermere as a leisure pursuit to enjoy the peace and fresh air of greenbelt land

Sarah Connor, Weybridge

Phil Shaz, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

simon white, Godalming
Would ruin a lovely habitat and the infrastructure locally simply isn't up to it.

John Newman, whitton

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead

Joanne Whitaker, Guildford

Cecilia Rappe, Weybridge

V Austin, Cobham

A . Hyde, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

mark james, sutton

dean currie, surbiton

David Watson, Amersham
This is beautiful woodland that should not be polluted in this way. As a visting golfer, I have had many enjoyable days at Silvermere and I'm appalled that this application can be considered. It must be stopped!

paul fowler, camberley

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Hayley Oxborough, Hersham

Louise long, Tadworth

Gordon Brierley, Woking
Totally inappropriate and ill-conceived, especially as another incinerator is planned for the former Wisley Airfield site less than a couple of miles away.

Francine Sheridan, london

xxxxxxxx, Bookham
Protect this green and open space from such an unwarranted and ill advised plan

Andrew Hartley, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Paul Whitney, Catford
Will ruin my great days at Silvermere and friends local environments. I jhave seen what the one in Central London has done. Not to mention the wildlife and Greenbelt itself!

John Moss,

xxxxxxxx, Aldershot

Irfan Ahmed, weybridge
Unbelieveable, it is going to traffic chaos, unsightly, more air pollution whether it is through traffic or the incinerator.

chrissie twigg-stewart, weybridge
Vehemently opposed.

xxxxxxxx, chertsey

M richardson, East Horsley
We object to the HGV traffic above all else. ONLY if the exit to Redhill Road from the M25 was opened would this be acceptable - NOT from the Brooklands/Cobham road

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Streatham
This does not appear to be the right location, the spread of exhaust pollution over the golf course would be detrimental.

xxxxxxxx, COBHAM
I am against this incinerator.
Here are my reasons :

A) National Green Belt policy statement
Source :
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/155499.pdf

1. para 2.1 “that Green Belt characteristics is their permanence and their protection must be maintained as far as can be seen ahead”.
2. Para 3.15 goes on to state “the visual amenities of the Green Belt should not be injured by proposals for development within or conspicuous from the Green Belt…(which)…might be visually detrimental by reason of their siting….”.
3. Para 3.2 states “inappropriate development is, by definition harmful to the Green Belt and it is for the applicant to show why permission should be granted”.
4. Para 3.4 states “construction of new buildings inside a Green Belt is inappropriate unless for certain specific types of developments (listed).” …This does NOT include incinerators!

B) Planning for sustainable waste management
Source :
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/1876202.pdf

See page 19/28
"Ensuring a Strong, Healthy and Just Society.
Meeting the diverse needs of all people in existing and future communities, promoting personal wellbeing, social cohesion and inclusion, and creating equal opportunity for all."

Roger Keay, Thorpe Bay
Build it somewhere else

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Rod Mac Donald, Camberley

Toby Foreman, West Byfleet
Please protect our Greenbelt

Liz Gardner, Claygate

xxxxxxxx, Cobham Surrey

xxxxxxxx, Claygate

xxxxxxxx, Kingston
The impact on health, saftey, local road infrastructure and wildlife has not been taken into full consideration with this planning application. The power station must not go ahead!

Mike Turner, Weybridge

D Maidment, Walton-on-Thames

Duncan Wyeth, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Kekoo Sethna, Weybridge
Please do not build incenerators on green belt land. As it is the area is over crowded and we have huge traffic problems.

Denise Jones,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

sarah palmer, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Hamish Mitchell, Bodmin
This is why we moved to Cornwall and clean air!

emma donald, puttenham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Debbie Conibere, Weybridge
Local School, Local Traffic and Local People would all be affected if this went ahead. Keep our Green Belt green!

Debbie Cain, weybridge

Charles Beresford, Weybridge
As a resident in the area and suffering from lung problems I am extremely concerned about this potential health hazard both for me and my family.Also the major disruption to traffic flow is unacceptable,we already have too many Tesco lorries cloging the area, its got to stop.

Louise Beresford, Weybridge
I am totally against this proposal due the harm it will cause to my husbands health who has a lung condition.

Katherine Sutcliffe, New Haw Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Woking

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
Not the right place for this project - far too built up.

Kevin Overton, Weybridge

Natalie Overton, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Obviously Green Belt doesn't mean anything these days, especially to Elmbridge Council!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This may be a brown field ex industrial site, but it is so close to local amenities (Schools,golf club, equestrian centre. Wisly Gardens and hotel) and the site of a new, large, senior citizens home, that it should not be considered as an appropriate location for a busy, noisy operation such as this. There must be more suitable brown field sites in the locality that are closer to the main trunk roads, that do not require the encroachment on already overworked local roads that this plan entails.

samantha court, addlestone

Audrey Evans, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

John Leheup, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
No thank you......!!!!!!!!

Richard Mulhall, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
WRONG PROJECT, WRONG PLACE; TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE; THINK AGAIN.......

xxxxxxxx, London

Sarah Pinsent, Shepperton

melanie farmer, byfleet

Michelle Thomas, Chertsey

Allison Haffenden, Byfleet
This area is already polluted with the M25 so close, and we don't need more lorries causing problems!!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Andrew O\'Neill, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Dorking
Please protect this Green Belt.

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Slough

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Michael Edginton, Weybridge
This is completely inappropriate!

James Girling-Budd, Cobham
Why is green belt land being abused when brown field sites are available

B. Newman, Byfleet
I am totally aginst this incinerator and find it unbelievable that Elmbridge borough council would even consider this application.

Becky Lewis, Weybridge

Dale Coskery, Oxshott
Inappropriate and dangerous in an urban neighbourhood

DONALD LEGGET, WEYBRIDGE
I have read the extremely detailed letter. I agree with all the points made. What worried me most is that one of the paries is in the processs of going bust.. Mt brother used to live in Foxholm and I know this site wekk. It is an attempt by the developers to make a fast buck out of what is a useless site,

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
extremely disappointing that the councils (elmbridge and surrey) have not communicated anything about this to residents. thanks to those who have highlighted this in advertisements and by word of mouth.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Brian Millard, Bookham
As a user of Silvermere Golf Course I am horrified at the prospect of this Biomass Gasification incinerator being built nearby

Michelle Sweet, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, byfleet

David Ross, Shepperton
Protect the green belt, there are plenty of other undeveloped areas to build this thing

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Fran Reed, Cobham

Rich Reed, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Brenda Chamberlain, Leatherhead

MR Simpson, Richmond
Green should mean Green

Peter Cummins, Walton
Unbelievable that an incinator power station can be contemplated inside the M25, still less in this particular spot. Surrey Council, you know what to do!

Umang Patel, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, New haw

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Protecting the environment

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Hersham

Pam Crellin, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This can only only have a negative effect on our environment - most importantly health, traffic congestion (already bad) and wildlife - especially the bird population which is only just recovering in the area.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This is an entirely unsuitable site for this purpose and a traffic blackspot. It needs to be relocated to a more suitable location

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Totally unacceptable for the area

Rogermeek, Esher
Level of pollution in green belt area not acceptable also increased traffic will cause congestion and road safety issues

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Too close to our home and way too close for our local schools. We should also consider the devaluation of local properties by having the incinerator close by. Ask if they are prepared to pay the incremental difference to EVERY home owner in the area. Do not let this happen!!

r reed,

David Ramage, Chobham Woking
This cannot be allowed to go ahead. It will have a serious detrimental impact to all surrounding areas. Stop the planning now.

lesley Corrie, Cobham

Martin Cave, Grays, Essex

Tove Lind, Esher
I strongly oppose the building of a wasteincinerator this close to Silvermere golf club and the green belt area. The fumes and airpollution

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
What a ridiculous choice of location in such a densely populated area with access that is already bottlenecked.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Anne Gregory, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Surely there's a better place for it!

xxxxxxxx, Walton On Thames
Totally ridiculous, the area is densely populated and needs no more pollution risk to people or wildflife and the local roads are fit to burst at the best of times let alone where there are issues on the M25 and/or A3.

sam, Kingston
I am moving to Weybridge, I'm moving away from Kingtson to get away from pollution, not closer to it

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
I am shocked that this is even being considered by the local council and shows how out of touch with locals/residents they really are.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Surrey

Vicki Gibb, Byfleet

Warren Gibb, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

Andy Park, W O T

brad gibb, byfleet
its to close to houses and byfleet village

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames

Victoria wild, Esher

Richard Bartlett, Weybridge
This is not good news for the local area. Apart from the environmental issues, the added traffic along the already far to busy A245 (Byfleet Road) will make it a nightmare.

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

Melanie Heath, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, wey road

Andy Sharp, Weybridge
Just not suitable for this area

douglas smith, cobham
please do not build

Justin Evans, Horley

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I am especially concerned about the impact on golfers, users of Silvermere and people who walk their dogs in the woods nearby

xxxxxxxx, Byfleeet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Why here and not other brown sites that are available. The reason we live here is to be able to enjoy the green belt area and the ability to allow our children the opportunity to be outside in fresh air. There are also enough trucks clogging up the inadequate road system around Byfleet and Weybridge - more trucks would just make this impossible.

xxxxxxxx, Old WOking

Andrew Gulliford, Cobham

bradley, byfleet
no no no !

D J L Crowley, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
This is terrible

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton
Huge campaigns encouraging us to reduce our carbon footprint and the adverse effect we're having on the planet and yet this is being considered?!

Kate Brenner, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I strongly oppose the building of the proposed incinerator. This area is simply too highly populated and we will all suffer from the increased traffic and pollution.

David Gibb, Tolworth
We're moving to the area and don't want the health and traffic hazards!

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I strongly object to this incinarator. We do not need it. The pollution and increased congestion are important negative uses.

Chris Davies, Torquay
There must be an alternative, and either way there needs to be full PUBLIC CONSULTATION.

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
What an appalling idea, how much more can a community take in a beautiful build up area.

Trevor Robinson, Weybridge
Inadequate roads to cope with existing traffic. Potential accident risk/closeness to National Grid power lines, loss of green belt and loss of amenity to the community. NO to this

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Fetcham
This would be a disaster, not just on an environmental level, but to add to the already congested and often gridlocked road system surrounding the propsed site shows that no-one in any planning capacity has actualy experienced using the roads at peak and off-peak times.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Inappropriate development in the wrong place

Lisa Threlfall, Cobham
We pay the taxes. Listen to the people who DO NOT want this polluting Incinerator to be built......

xxxxxxxx, Webridge

HELEN GRIGGS, WEYBRIDGE

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
A more suitable site, further away from schools and residential areas should be sourced. We should all fight to protect our green belt.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
Dominic Raab, MP for Esher and Walton says that protecting the greenbelt is on his top 3 priorities... time to show it!

Robert Hayden, Weybridge
I'm generally open minded about new technology and development since we have new problems to solve but I'm very concerned about the potential for pollutants in an extremely densely populated part of the country, as well as the impact on water supplies used for cooling. I don't see that this proposal brings any benefit to the people who live in this area so why should it go ahead, and the safety evidence seems as yet unproven.

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

xxxxxxxx, WEST BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

R Martin, Walton

Richard Attwood-Smith, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This is a residential area and not an industrial site.

Suella Ritchie, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, shepperton
Seriously concern regarding children at school less than 1 mile away & protection of the local environment in this Green Belt

Paul McGuire, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Greenbelt land should not be used for such purposes. Such risks should not be taken with the health of our children.

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Nicholas Orr, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I strongly oppose this planning.

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, SURREY

xxxxxxxx, Pyrford

Miss Bella, Walton On Thames

Mr Laszlo, Walton On Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, molesey

rebecca scorer,

xxxxxxxx, East Molesey, Surrey

Harvey Elliott, Weybridge

D Mackinnon, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Nicholas Kjelgaard, Byfleet

Joanna Kjelgaard, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Do not kill our children

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
To put something with such disastrous health risks is outrageous and we owe it to our children to make sure that it does not happen.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, cobham

Paul Bruton, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
So much for transparency! I would just like to reiterate everything that has been said: health consequences, traffic chaos, an eyesore, on Green Belt land etc. There is surely somewhere more appropriate for an incinerator. It's certainly not here. The Green Belt is there for a reason, not to be utilized at the whim of SCC.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, claygate

Frank van Ekeren, Oxshott

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Tamarin Goldsmith, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher

John Ebdon,

Jo Barlow, Long Ditton

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Esher

Brian Smith, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Why in a populated area? There are certainly many other safer options

Sarah Ferguson, Walton-on-Thames

Ben Ferguson, Walton-on-Thames

Mrs Bowen, Esher
No thank you! Green belt must be protected. Serious lack of consideration.

Suzanne Azar, Kingston

Tracey Whicker, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on thames
This project will polute a large area where many people live and visit. As an asthma sufferer I am very worried about it.

xxxxxxxx, Claygate
I am a father of two young children, both of whom attend School locally and live within the area to be impacted which are located very close proximity to the proposed site of the Incinerator.

The reasons for my objection to the above planning permission are:

1. The detrimental effect on children's health.

2. Building on Green Belt, which would not be in accordance with the Law.

3. Environmental impact
- the site is currently a haven for wildlife
- there would be increased light and noise pollution

4. Overcrowding and danger from very large lorries making deliveries.

5. Negative impact on cyclists, ramblers, riders and golfers.

6. The presence of an incinerator would be completely unsuitable in an area of natural beauty.

xxxxxxxx, Stoke d\\'Abernon

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

Nuala Kearney, Esher

Ross Taylor, esher

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Esher
don't do it for our children!

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
This is simply awful and simply CANNOT happen, lorries, traffic most importantly polution!!

Stephen Scott, walton-on-thames
Fundamentally the wrong location for such a project. The roas is busy enough, sports facilities and schools would be effected and further green belt area in the Elmbridge region destroyed.

Lance Drake, Stoke D\\'Abernon

Julie Mellish, Walton on Thames
The proposals will be a disaster

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Katie Cooper, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Don't destroy our village!

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher
incredible - thanks for organising this site

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Air pollution is already a concern in this area due to its proximity to major roads, M25, A3. Adding to this makes no sense without the strongest possible justification. At present, there is no convincing argument that need outweighs the very many disadvantages of this project.

xxxxxxxx, Claygate
There must be places further away from communities then the proposed site. Lets not ruin our futures, we realise that we need these facilities but having them close to where people live is really not good.

Emma Lynn, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Wendy Didaskalou, Weybridge

Tamara Frasik, Walton-On-Thames
Protect our enviroment and our childrens Health

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I do not believe that this project has been thought through properly. Is it to generate a pathetic amount of electricity or to save wood going to landfill? If wood has to b eimported then it falls between two stools.

Oliver Northeast, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Wrybridge

A Haley, Weybridge

Hammad Nawaz, WEYBRIDGE

Chris Sheldrake, Knaresborough

GillianSheldrake, Knaresborough

Jacqui Stephenson, Weybridge
This will affect the area and is not needed

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

Martina Blake, Oxshott
A highly unsuitable location affecting many people in nearby towns and villages and a road with horrific traffic problems already. Everyone we know thinks this is a bad idea. Very unhappy with SCC and their lack of common sense.

Angela Rhydderch,

Alex Bowman, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Absolutly no way it's a disaster waiting to happen.this plan must not be allowed to go ahead. Davidcameron must r informed.

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Yet another rediculous idea. I wonder what the kickbacks are for the SCC... NO to the incinerator!!

Ann Singer, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
I think this is mad! Not only is this a green belt area with both golf clubs and more importantly schools and wildlife reserves within it, we already have immense polution and noise to put up with the never ending trail of tesco lorries (plus others) coming down Parvis Road 24/7, adding waste trucks to this already bad situation is pushing us to the limit and totally unacceptable....

xxxxxxxx, byfleet
With so many concerns particularly that of health a project such as


this should have been made aware
by post. I only became aware of the proposal through a friend.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Carol Lord,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge,

Jane winter, Walton on Thames

DR HOWES, Weybridge
Save our greenbelt before it's too late!!!!

E Chidwick, Sandhurst

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Lise Naughton, Reigate
Alternatives which do not negatively impact the health of residents in the area need to be investigated. And reduction in the amount of refuse that is generated e.g. supermarket over-packaging of goods.

xxxxxxxx, WALTON ON THAMES

xxxxxxxx, Claygate

xxxxxxxx, cobham
This should not even needed to be discussed....!!

James Kemp, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Claire Engeham, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone
Why is it that the local residents have not been made aware of this a long time ago and publicity against it has not been more obvious ? It's a scandal

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames

Kenn van Hauen, Byfleet
This is a crazy proposal and will bring nothing of benefit to the area. It is hard enough trying to negotiate your way along the congested A245 as it is, not to mention the devastating pollution to the environment and the depreciation in property prices. We see houses on the market already because people know their house won't sell with an Incinerator on the doorstep! Take your incinerator to a non-residential/Green Belt area!

Irene Looney, Cobham

Mr Robert Taylor, Byfleet

Peter F Hogg, Weybridge
Suggest writing to members of St Georges Hill Golf Club, Tennis Club and Silvermere Golf Club and residents of St Georges Hill.

Peter Martin, West Byfleet

Jo Baldwin, Penzance Cornwall
A crazy ludicrous proposal to in reality, poison the local area with dangerous toxins. Together with the M25 and the A3 residents will be choked. From an X resident who lived in Byfleet for 20 years and who still cares!! Stop this NOW!!

Patrick Brown, Walon on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
STOP THE INSANITY!

Tanya Hodges, Weybridge

janek schaefer, Walton-on-Thames
no dioxins from industry please

xxxxxxxx, West Molesey
This cannot be allowed to occur. Our health, and that of the you ng ones and the elderly, is at stake.

xxxxxxxx, Send / Woking
There are enough industrial sites to build something like this one - not on a valuable greenbelt.

tracey boatright, Walton-on-thames

Viv Clarke, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, surbiton

Nicola Phillips, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Kingston upon Thames

adam frost, london

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, London
I completely object to the proposed incinerator development. It is completely inappropriately sighted for the scale of activity intended to be carried out there.

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Toby Speller, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

E Mitchell, Weybridge
This will cause so many issues, health and nature for a start! Keep it away!!!

Frank Pache, Weybridge

mr geoffrey goldberg and Mrs ruth Goldberg, Byfleet
Do not have an email address. Emailed by local Councillor

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Neil Flarry, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead

xxxxxxxx, Aylesbury

Ellie Slade, Byfleet

Julie Cryer, Byfleet

Harry Slade, Byfleet

nicola, Horsell
An environmental disaster. The Government should be looking at the root cause of the issue!

Mark, Woking

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

john proctor, byfleet
the road junction of redhill road and the byfleet raod is bad at the best of
tmes how on earth can we cope wih a continuous flow of lories from this proposed site.

mrs h proctor, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Joanne hutt, Cobham

Sophiw Woollen, Egham

david,

xxxxxxxx, Reading
I agree with another signatory: This is not really an issue of whether Cobham itself is an appropriate place for such an incinerator, as they should not be built anywhere. The idea of zero emissions is nonsense - there will be a lot of Carbon Dioxide emitted, and it will be impossible to scrub all Dioxins from the emissions too. It is really hard to understand what Elmbridge Council are thinking here, unless it is a planning ploy as suggested by another signatory.

Christine Dearsley, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Jo Lovell, Byfleet
It's disgusting this is even being considered. There's obviously money to be made somewhere. It's just greed over people's lives and the wildlife

Maria Sawyer, Byfleet

Nicola Pullinger, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
no way!

Bowler, Byfleet
We have too much traffic in Byfleet as it is, we do not need more.

Jane Morin,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Holly Kelly, Byfleet

Rosalie Muir, Binfield
Why cant these toxic places be put on brownfield sites ? It seems that the powers that be hate anything do do with the country and scenic beauty and wont be happy until we are all living in a vile toxic concrete over populated ugly environment. I know I dont live directly in this area but the same thing is happening on my doorstep as well, the countryside must be preserved at all costs, there are alternatives but the governement want to destroy our countryside.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Sunbury-on-Thames
Keep this horribleness away from where my children are to grow up!

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Byfleet is directly affect by this proposed plan.

traffic in the area is already a major problem along the area leading to this site. The emissions that it will cause is unjustifiable because it is bound to increase as it is a commercial companies plan. The area is green belt and as such should be preserved for the future. While the plan falls in the Elmbridge Council are it is the residents of Woking that are most likely to be affected.Planner it is in your hands to protect the environment and the residents we hold you responsible for your actions.It begs consideration in the current financial climate can any company involved be capable of fullfilling and maintaining obligations and maintain the safety of the area.How long would it be before the operators find other waste/s that are more profitable and dangerous to residnts. This proposed plan must be rejected or take the risk locals take legal action for the results.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is too close to the residential area of Byfleet Village, which is made up mostly of families with children, huge health and safety issues of air pollution and HGVs on minor roads.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Traffic on Byfleet road is already a nightmare. no more lorries ! I also object to any development on green belt land as there is precious little of it, and large areas of brownfield sites which can be used for development of all kinds.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Keep our greenbelt just that, and no more lorries on Byfleet road for heavens sake !

melanie ross, byfleet
AS A MUM OF A VERY HAPPY HEALTHY 14 MONTH OLD TODDLER AND HOPEFUL PLANS FOR A FURTHER ADDITION TO OUR FAMILY , I AM VERY STRONGLY AGAINST THE INCINERATOR AS THE WORRY OF MY DAUGHTERS AND ANY FURTHER UNBORN CHILD /CHILDREN IS OF GREAT CONCERN, I AM ALSO A NANNY HOPING TO CHILD MIND IN THIS AREA AS WE LIVE IN A VERY FAMILY BUSY AREA, ALL OUR CHILDREN NEED PROTECTING FROM THESE VERY TOXIC FUMES , THIS CAN NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE BUILT AND HARM OUR CHILDREN .

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet, Surrey

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet, Surrey.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet, Surrey.

Adam Frost, london

Jim Craig, Byfleet
Doesn't solve the waste problem, you need more waste to keep fuelling it. Increases cancer risks, respiratory problems, doesn't reduce CO2 emissions and still leaves 30% of poisonous fly ash residue which needs to go to landfill.

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames

Edward Walliss, Epsom

xxxxxxxx,

Faye Playfoot, Byfleet

Darren. Playfoot, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Woking

M Llewellyn, Cobham

Jason Petsch, Cobham

Richard Burroughs, Thames Ditton
This surely cannot be allowed to go ahead.
There are better alternatives which must be explored.

RB Petsch, Esher

Travis Hansen, Weybridge

Alexia, London
NO! to the biomass gasification incinerator! This will damage animals, wildlife and environment

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
Strongly oppose this development in this area.

xxxxxxxx, chertser

Anthony, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, CHERTSEY
THIS PLAN NEED SERIOUS RE_THINKING . AS USUAL THE PUBLIC OPINION STANDS FOR NOTHING!

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

sharon croall, Byfleet
leave the green belt alone.

andrew jones, woking
Be careful about this proposed incinorator as we had a simular proposal at wisley airfield it was rejected but we ended up with a composting plant to be built there so this could be a ploy to develop other projects .
It is totaly unsutable to place such a sit in such a congested area for hgvs as the road infrastructure would need upgrading as well, we already have a fair proportion of recycling vehicles driving through Ripley a village which has been spoilt by to much traffic .
There are also health issues here to the whole and wider area as pollution of all sorts is already to high and adding to it is totaly irrisponible and totaly degrading to people ,wildlife,greenbelt,and leisure .
Also the person who suggested Woking as a possible site for a incinerator should be ashamed of themself as no town ,village ,or any populated area should be treated like Elbridge resident currentley are .
Also what about the water i read from another person that would cool the plant, where would that go , would it be trucked out or would it be allowed to flow into the local rivers and streams and how or would it be cleaned .
shame on both Elbridge and Surrey county councils for again ignoring the electorate on local issues , all they care about is how much money they can squease from the populas, we should all be more aware of proposals and act accordingly so No NO NO to the incinorator in Elbridge or any where .

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Having moved away from incinerators in Belvedere, Kent due to them causing life threatening Asthma, it is now horrific that there are plans to build another one on my doorstep. Life is more important than burning products and polluting the atmosphere.

Cllr Christine Elmer, Walton-on-Thames
Inappropriate use of this site. Traffic concerns which will also impact on my residents in Walton.

xxxxxxxx, Surrey
Putting this in residential areas is just wrong, there are lots of places where it could be located which would not cause problems. I don't think Lyne is a good idea as one person has stated, that is also a residential area and if you lived near it you would understand this.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Luton

xxxxxxxx, hersham
save our green belt.. we already have heavy lorry traffic on this road we dont need any more!

Linda Jackson, Lowestoft

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, surrey
could be that someone is making money on this as a back hander why else would they even consider this in a highly populated area the traffic around this area is already heavy and most mornings at a stand still and when the m25 has accidents on it this area i used as a cut through we have loads of schools near the area too would they want children breathing this up no they tried to get this in lyne big petition went ahead they didnt get permission so why bring it here when so many different locations that are not in a highly populated area

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Guildford
Definate NO to this

Guy Hill, Guildford

Michelle Eden, Hampton Hill
I am a volunteer at Katz Castle and ride at Silvermere Stables. It's a beautiful place to go. I can't understand why anyone would want to build an incinerator in such a lovely place, especially now there is a retirement home nearby.

ALASTAIR MORRISON, Cobham
I add my name to the petition on behalf of 387 pupils, aged 3 to 13, and the 70+ Staff who live, work and play on a school campus within a few hundred yards of the proposed site for this incinerator. Our concerns are for the health and safety of this school community and all those living in the local neighbourhood, and for the inevitable impact on the already over-burdened roads accessing Redhill Road.

Sharon ROWE, MORDEN
Not near to an historic Animal Santuary

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

lennox, wrecclesham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
It must be possible to find another site, not close to where people live and play sports and have to drive to their work and schools.

xxxxxxxx, Godalming
So incredibly opposed to putting an incinerator in such a densely populated area affecting so many school children and not to mention the added congestion from lorry traffic. Shame on the govt for selecting a site which will negatively impact the lives of so many!!!

Franciska de Boer, Addlestone

Victoria olivier, Weybridge

Tracy waring, Walton-on-Thames

Lesley Loizou, Leatherhead
Avery Healthcare Group are in the process of opening a 72 bed care home for elderly residents many of whomn suffer from respiratory problems and other auto immune diseases. We very much believe that the increase in heavy traffic vehicles will significantly impact on the health of our residents and are very concerned about the impact that the incinerator may have on their already compromised health. Whilst we understand the need for a site of this nature we believe that the location will be extremely deterimental to the residential location and the many vulnerable people within the immediate vicinity.

xxxxxxxx, Claygate

Jisfafengarse, Raduznyj
O Street follies: spending millions of dollars on a streetcar museum--with tracks but no cars--in the heart of Georgetown

------------------------------------------------------
lightsmade.com

Veronique Allwood, Kingston

xxxxxxxx, Woking

Graciela, Walton on Thames
We owe it to our future generations to have air free of pollution!!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Living close to the site im concerned for both my familys health and the impact on the already congested roads. This must be stopped

P>VIZOSO, weybridge sy
as an area of extremely high pollution levels and a massive rise in breast cancer rates over the last five years the building of such an incinerator would produce massive further health risks.

xxxxxxxx, Windsor

Kevi Tapsfield, Woking

Shane Hackett, Weybridge

William Newton, Walton on Thames
Build it in KINGSTON !!!

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Totally unsuitable location.

Rosemary Morgan, Guildford
This is not a suitable location for a Biomass incinerator.

David Robertson, Stoke Poges
I am wholly opposed to the planned incinerator site which, if implemented, will ruin the lives of a great many of the local citizens, their families and their children and will also cause lasting damage and degradation of the local and regional environment.

Clive Cane, New Haw

Peta Louise Jeffery, Leatherhead

Tony Royle, Weybridge
Would be wxtremely narrow-minded to allow this to happen.

Clive Powell, Ebreon, France
My wife died of cancer through pollutants and I sure as hell don't want to be put at risk whilst playing golf. These pollutants do kill. In addition, the infrastructure would not cope with the extra traffic. It's bad enough now.

mr k & mrs hone, addlestone
better places than redhill road which could be used in surrey

Denise Day, Walton On Thames

Val Hibberd, Gomshall
Find a waste ground for the incinerator not next to a animal sanctuary.

xxxxxxxx, twickenham

Dawn Hare, New Haw
I am pregnant and do not wish my unborn child to be subject to the toxic gases produced by this incinerator. Also I cannot believe that such a thing could be built in the greenbelt!

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone
This a proposterous idea in such a beautiful green belt area. It will have a serious detrimental effect on the environment, people's health and will compromise an already difficult traffic flow area. What happens when they realise it's causing too much traffic issues? Chop down more trees and widen the roads? Please let's have some sense and reject this application outright.

xxxxxxxx, London

Stuart Bowden, East Horsley
The HGV traffic along the Byfleet Rd is already very heavy all day, every day, (Tesco depot etc.) - adding more to it makes no sense at all.

Ben Cruickshank, Addlestone
This proposal Sucks!

Richard Michael Armstrong, London

Helen Booker, Weybridge
Health and environmental impact of such a development so close to many populated areas.

Stacey Tanner,

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

C Morley, Cobham
Incinerators produce fine particles in the furnace. Even with modern particle filtering of the flue gases, a small part of these is emitted to the atmosphere. PM2.5 is not separately regulated in the European Waste Incineration Directive, even though they are repeatedly correlated spatially to infant mortality in the UK (M.Ryan's ONS data based maps around the EfW/CHP waste incinerators at Edmonton, Coventry, Chineham, Kirklees and Sheffield).[44][45][46] Under WID there is no requirement to monitor stack top or downwind incinerator PM2.5 levels.[47] Several European doctors associations (including cross discipline experts such as physicians, environmental chemists and toxicologists) in June 2008 representing over 33,000 doctors wrote a keynote statement directly to the European Parliament citing widespread concerns on incinerator particle emissions and the absence of specific fine and ultrafine particle size monitoring or in depth industry/government epidemiological studies of these minute and invisible incinerator particle size emissions.[48]
Local communities are often opposed to the idea of locating waste processing plants such as incinerators in their vicinity (the Not In My Back Yard phenomenon). Studies in Andover, Massachusetts strongly correlated 10% property devaluations with close incinerator proximity.[49]
Prevention, waste minimisation, reuse and recycling of waste should all be preferred to incineration according to the waste hierarchy. Supporters of zero waste consider incinerators and other waste treatment technologies as barriers to recycling and separation beyond particular levels, and that waste resources are sacrificed for energy production.[50][51][52]

Terry Gardener, Banstead
the estimated fallout zone is grossly understated in my opinion, in recent weeks we in the UK have been affected by noxious fumes from France! ....

Renata Buchanan, Harrow

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

jordan13sicsj,
wbPubuIfvbG [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11[/url] wkDkbhLkzsF [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 Bred[/url] wzJiljFqfuP [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 Breds[/url] wtQzsoXnpwZ [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Bred 11s[/url] additionally sign on all by yourself at any local wellness- you have to thats is actually nessicary. please don't cease eating sugars, they help your system characteristic. but nonetheless,but nevertheless,on the contrary let us accept it- not every one of us is able to afford the site. Cole Haan Nike Air shoes or boots provides you with the comfort in regards to sneaker with the feel of a classical wedding gown shoe. until recently tiring sports shoes implement that require feet might be awkward or usually blistered on the end through the day. Cole Haan has brought greater to do with Nike runners in which to loafers, shoes and also of techniques that situated online or in any associated with merchants,

jordan13kdsek,
wzTwyxItvfW [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11[/url] wzVjfwPcrvZ [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 Bred[/url] wvPyxoVtleS [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 Breds[/url] waOdzgSlxoJ [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Bred 11s[/url] potassium is important mineral which helps to keep your body carrying out work thoroughly. not only does blood potassium help to keep up with the fluid rates on your body jointly helps parts of your muscles producing and also soul growing. lacking the necessary blood potassium in what you eat you may feel lots of bothersome unintended effects among carved cramping pains to weakness that will help unnatural heartrate diarrhea.

jordan13tbvpe,
wnUvenRlztA [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11[/url] wdHvfgKdjnV [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan Retro 11[/url] woGmgjToreY [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Jordan 11 2013[/url] wmFaayZpjrM [url=http://www.vadco.org/sports/jordan11breds.asp]Bred 11s[/url] these kinds of damaging is afflicted with end up as the substantive guitar lessons i designed to allow us grasp outcomes of the autumn, so you can easliy out our-self into your upcoming capabilities offered by the forthcoming alter towards a new age. perform correctly is not overstressed. We pick these types of unpleasant conditions for our financial growth and also can be inside of the home in graduating of their final results.

wfJuovH, Port Orange
wyToekZntxS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/hermes.html]エルメス[/url] wjEhyqLscbW [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/hermes.html]エルメス 財布[/url] wxQqxlSoiwH [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/hermes.html]エルメス バッグ[/url] wzYuvdLworC [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/hermes.html]エルメス バーキン[/url]
wvDekhIpdmO [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]シャネル[/url] wmRnjkAupjT [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]シャネル 財布[/url] wgQbujZaltX [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]シャネル バッグ[/url] whBzciEqqhD [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]chanel 財布[/url] wnOyqbGyjcX [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]chanel[/url] wcRujdLiuqS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chanel.html]chanel バッグ[/url]
wiWwjjPssaI [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ルイヴィトン[/url] wcNcjuDcpnN [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ヴィトン[/url] weKofwQbfyX [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ルイヴィトン 財布[/url] wtBwzeZzylR [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ヴィトン 財布[/url] wbDhkzPormZ [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ヴィトン バッグ[/url] whZtcyEyrvS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ルイヴィトン バッグ[/url] wkUxkySpufS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ヴィトン 長財布[/url] woRxqiRxifQ [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/louisvuitton.html]ルイヴィトン 長財布[/url]
wrDuzkQuyrO [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ[/url] wwHmcvRhvqL [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ 財布[/url] wbDtuwLblcE [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]coach 財布[/url] wmLnupVewgA [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ アウトレット[/url] woMatyTguuF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]coach アウトレット[/url] wqLyldVbomN [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ バッグ[/url] wjNysxKjkkF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]coach バッグ[/url] wqKfzqXybsN [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/coach.html]コーチ 長財布"[/url]
wgXaodOzkkK [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]アディダス[/url] wcIhriRbczY [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]adidas originals[/url] waJjhcBtxlS [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]adidas[/url] wcPuohJqbbM [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]アディダス スニーカー[/url] waGjpuNmxwA [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/adidas.html]アディダス オリジナルス[/url]
wrQtaeAfazU [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ[/url] wkQwtxCgvlE [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]prada[/url] wyVseiHvaqG [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ 財布[/url] whVpnwOqbwF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]prada 財布[/url] wnDkteQqfoG [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ バッグ[/url] wmBrimGwfvB [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ 公式[/url] wcPkviFaugO [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ アウトレット[/url] wpSeqyFhimT [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]prada バッグ[/url] wyRpliXxjcL [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/prada.html]プラダ 長財布[/url]
wsIfmhXlwcJ [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]クロエ[/url] weOoubYilfU [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]クロエ 財布[/url] wyMwvyBcksK [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]クロエ バッグ[/url] wxCkypBthkV [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]クロエ 店舗[/url] wiPslhNudeA [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]バレンシアガ[/url] wrTdzvEkvlU [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]バレンシアガ バッグ[/url] wdCwujZbpcQ [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]バレンシアガ 財布[/url] wpGihxUncfU [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/chloe-balenciaga.html]バレンシアガ 店舗[/url]
wkKdqyAcreI [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトン[/url] wbIfotSplsC [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトン[/url] wxNrvnVyafR [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトン 財布[/url] wgWqtmRmjcD [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトン 財布[/url] wdKgrtRcbjG [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトン バッグ[/url] woBoqaNepcD [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトン バッグ[/url] wtHcmsCfmaE [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトン公式[/url] wtOncsNhnsF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトン公式[/url] wwRpshJcymT [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ルイヴィトンコピー[/url] wvLbklGuavC [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/lv.html]ヴィトンコピー[/url]

やっぱり女の子はこうでなくっちゃね！という夢のようなシーン
【東京エリア】
スクウェア・エニックスは、2013年3月24日18時より開催されるプレイステーション3版『コール オブ デューティ ブラックオプスII』の全国大学対抗戦 決勝トーナメントにおいて、Twitterを用いた優勝チーム予想キャンペーンを実施するpixivにて『TOMB RAIDER（トゥームレイダー）』をテーマとしたファンアートコンテストが開催スタート【ファミ通EE】
【エコバッグ】【ホールフーズ】アメリカセレブご愛用エコバッグ！【Whole Foods Market】ホールフーズマーケットオリジナルエコバッグシェリル・クロウデザインのショッピングバッグ 05P14jun10
コサージュ＆持ち手付きのかご！クラフトペーパーバンド（100円キット）

wbMhrnA, Little Rock
wnAxekNvqjU [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] weCqgqWlrsJ [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8[/url] wpWxitJeyxK [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 For Sale[/url] woNkwaPzanH [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan Retro 8[/url] wdYwjlIvnuC [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wtFxydLqvtE [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 2013[/url]
wyXrdqNirqI [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wmTlomPzkjC [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8[/url] wmLknrTnkjN [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wcHxljBxsuJ [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Jordan Retro 8[/url] wcPaxiQvfeG [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wpBxtwFjolL [url=http://www.rampartrange.org/sports/jordan8-bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 2013[/url]
wwDoglMdkxI [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wrQrveJegyM [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8[/url] wrZywuZjtlY [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wnRrhfKkcxY [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wiYeccOlvhN [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan Retro 8[/url] wzRzupKkieO [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wtVxlvMvjzF [url=http://www.dotsquares.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 2013[/url]
wxYwxnWqgpI [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wsUjwiLmhxP [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8[/url] wpDgrvEdomH [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wzAjaxXcxkY [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8 Bugs Bunny[/url] wdHssyUlrtR [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan Retro 8[/url] whCczoAzikI [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Air Jordan 8[/url] wwYyzvHampW [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Jordan 8 2013[/url] wzEgbmTwaaC [url=http://www.thewellbookshop.com/brand/jordan8bugsbunny.html]Cheap Jordan 8[/url]
the instant one first derives passion for knitting, if feels like it is a hobby in which fabrics, such as wool, Reigns superior. by all means, yarn is the material that is employed for knitting, But massive, As the worldwide internet has now enlarged, accordingly possesses the knitting field. The wool for the spare time pursuit knitter enters more alternatives prior to now; a great deal more that when take a moment to one type of yarn - although for many different indicators and so colourings - had as replacements.

Jordan 11 Bred ntgyn,
drink simultaneously stops excess fat intake, meaning that they just don't get the fat-soluble nutritional vitamins who they need. Alcoholics could be missing in nutritional products A, d, u, b and moreover nited kingdom. every one of these nutritional vitamin supplements are expected for hurt healing in cellphone vehicle repairs and this means that alcoholics usually tend to bruise instead heal shortly as,

[url=http://www.ejglobal.com/blog.php?do=showone&type=blog&cid=9&itemid=204611]pJlfzG[/url]
[url=http://rangdou.219.xuelon.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1137100]rEgmvM[/url]
[url=http://www.dforever.cn/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=475692&extra=]kAxzmI[/url]
[url=http://www.vvyahoo.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=261588]gKgkiL[/url]
[url=http://www.hue23.com/apps.php?q=diary&a=detail&did=914223&uid=145753]yTzmmS[/url]
[url=http://www.baiduyishouji.com/thread-15641-1-1.html]mPudjZ[/url]
[url=http://novadental.com.mk/all-white-foamposites-4o0f14]dIoptZ[/url]
[url=http://www.credit-times.com/bbs//forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2094854&extra=]hJwbpO[/url]
[url=http://www.geihuituan.com/luntan/viewthread.php?tid=75974&extra=]gMcixK[/url]
[url=http://22090.com/]iBzbnG[/url]
[url=http://approvideo.org/]wZcmkF[/url]
[url=http://www.xiaolanhai.com/thread-8311-1-1.html]jOqaiJ[/url]
[url=http://www.bjzhishang.com/forum/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1740684]gAxfsU[/url]
[url=http://zhongmele.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=835]aZnfhB[/url]
[url=http://www.pacraftbeer.com/pacbforums/topic.php?id=17613&replies=1#post-18159]nJvvnV[/url]
[url=http://vbook.1000v.cn/sexapp/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=930349]rSqegE[/url]
[url=http://www.masonworld.com/running-b2evolution-multiple-blogs-multiple-domains-one-install-shared-host/]uIzvsP[/url]
[url=http://bq.likelai.com.cn/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2451381]iVkmwC[/url]
[url=http://www.ylmsy.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=72934]fCivsJ[/url]
[url=http://ptfbc.org/?q=node/367#comment-300461]bWxpfI[/url]

Janina, Boyertown
Remarkable! Its actually awesome post, I have got much clear idea regarding from this piece of writing.

Franklyn, Banjup
We're a gaggle of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with useful information to work on. You have performed a formidable task and our entire group will likely be thankful to you.

Dean, Siebnen
My partner and I stumbled over here coming from a different website and thought I should check things out. I like what I see so now i'm following you. Look forward to going over your web page again.

Fletcher, Guinadi
Greetings! Quick question that's entirely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My site looks weird when browsing from my iphone. I'm trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to correct this issue. If you have any recommendations, please share. Thanks!

Melaine, Groede
My family members always say that I am wasting my time here at web, however I know I am getting familiarity everyday by reading such good articles or reviews.

hjzdfoit, Bedford
[url=http://www.manotickgardens.com/assets/index.htm]Michael kors sale[/url] This may be why a physical deterrent, such as a deer fence, may be the most effective way to keep deer out of the yard. [url=http://www.chaussuresjordanfrance.com]Chaussures jordan[/url] Ijajibkwu [url=http://www.caryma.com]windows 7 product key[/url]
ljqore 569917 [url=http://www.gabinogs.com]windows 7 key[/url] 246196 [url=http://www.petersaul.com.au/gfx/michaelkors.html]Michael kors on sale[/url]

Lorri, Zoetermeer
An impressive share! I've just forwarded this onto a coworker who has been conducting a little research on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast due to the fact that I discovered it for him... lol. So let me reword this.... Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending some time to discuss this issue here on your site.

Lamont, Clarksdale
Hello, the whole thing is going nicely here and ofcourse every one is sharing information, that's in fact good, keep up writing.

Alexandria, Harbottle
What's up, all is going fine here and ofcourse every one is sharing facts, that's actually good, keep up writing.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
This planning needs to be properly evalusted in this Green Belt.

tony philipson, Weybridge

Philip Brown, Weybridge
There are plenty of other sites in the area eg Lyne where the incinerator could be located

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

David Wynn-Jones, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Edmund Hodgeon, Weybridge
Over our dead bodies. Many places to build this on old industrial sites in the UK. This has to be a scheme to downgrade the planning to be able to build houses and the council is going to fall right for it. Please council do not be duped by these people pretending they want to be environmentally friendly. It is a con!!!!

Ms Johnson, Cobham
Keep our Green Belt protected

xxxxxxxx, Windlesham
What a nightmare, 20 tonne HGVs on minor roads. More traffic chaos and more air pollution.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, WEYBRIDGE

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Health and safety issues, wildlife issues, green belt- easy decision NO to the incinerator. Green Belt laws must be enforced by the County.

Reg Heath, Weybridge

Alice Duff,

Thelma Ager, Hullbridge, Essex
Why polute the air around Hampton Court, Wisley and Cobham when there are other brown field sites further away from popular visited areas.

Louise Gomez, Rochford

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I cannot believe that this project should have been allowed to come this far! This is a populated residential area with many people leaving more polluted areas closer to London to enjoy better quality of life, including clean air. This project will destroy the area with respect to air quality, traffic and as a result noise. This cannot be allowed to proceed!

Lulu Appleton, Cobham,

Michael Appleton, Cobham, Surrey

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Lets protect our greenbelt!

Ilya Katsnelson,

Lucy Hayward, Weybridge
I have serious concerns about health issues, an increase in traffic in an already congested traffic blackspot, the environmental impact and the erosion of green belt land arising in connnection with the proposed incinerator.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Has anyone considered the effect on the numerous schools in the area? Long term consequences on council and the owners of the incinerators? Has the council learnt nothing from the past?

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybrudge

xxxxxxxx, hersham
350 children at school less than 1 mile away - does the council really want to battle legal issues for years to come - this is a potential health issue for these children and their families

Peter Morley,

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Amanda Kesterton, Weybridge
I believe this development will prove to be an irresponsible development and devastating to all life in its near vicinity.

Mr D.A.SHARPE, Weybridge

Terry Williams, Walton on Thames
Detrimental effect on childrens health.Building on green belt.Danger from large lorries.Completely unsuitable in an area of natural beauty.Traffic congestion.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Leeve this area alone please

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I oppose the planning application

Barbara Wardle, Hersham

R.A.Dawes,

Alicia Harris, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Ian/ Plumb, Walton on Thames
It sounds like anothe cockied idea forom this govenment and I hope the petittion will presuade them to another of their U turns.

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Why has our MP not said anything yet! Typical.

Eleanor Mrgan Bearne, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Woking
I called SCC to complain about the lack of tranparency about this planning application and the fact that there plenty of Brownfield sites in other locations far away from the residential mass that is surrounding this proposed site. SCC seemed more concerned in stonewalling me. As a result of which I am insensed by their attitude. This would be a disaster for the whole area and a reckless and irrisponsible act on the part of SCC if it is allowed to go ahead. It must be popposed by everyone who resides in the surrounding area and countryside (Green Belt)

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Thanks for being so open about this SCC...not. This whole things sums you up really - bravo and well done for your excellent guardianship of this part of Surrey. Anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together can see how impractical this area is in regards to already high traffic, due to an industrial estate at Brooklands, and the number of people living here.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Tames

Coral Laird, Weybridge
Signing to save the local environment.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
Save our green belt

sarah brown, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
No thank you !

Simon Kay, Walton On Thames

Jason Marcus McCabe, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Jenny Dalton,

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames
Inappropriate development in the wrong place

Kevin Holding,

Robert James,

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This a health hazzard to everyone in the area and a disgusting way to use green belt land in surrey

Sandi Beaumont, Weybridge
This greenbelt area features high residency, is one of natural beauty featuring a large wood, riding centre, and golf club, a purpose built Care home residency and the local council, for profit, want to destroy this area by putting a totally unnecessary incinerator. there are heaps of brown belt / industrial areas where this could be situated. Think again, Elmbridge, This is a totally unsuitable site.

V. Murphy, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, esher

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Peter Jenner, Byfleet
This will increase pollution and disruption to residents We must protect our green belt

xxxxxxxx, Derry City
A health hazzard to everyone in the surrounding area and a disgusting misuse of green belt land in Surrey. Plenty of alternative Brown sites readily available for this scheme. This has to be the proper option, Use up existing brown field sites. Please do not let these fools rob our country of evermore green land sites. We have to balance and redress decades of infastructure damage and unused brown field sites. left as eyesores dotted around our country. Greenbelt land should never be wasted in such a manner as in the past. Thank Again!!!!!

J P Murphy, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
NO BIOMASS INCINERATOR!!! This is Green Belt Land!

Paul Merry,

Nick Taylor,
Surely a more remote site should be considered away from established communities? The Council's analysis of sites should be reviewed carefully.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Ian Picken, GODALMING

xxxxxxxx, Weybrige

EDWARD Sharp, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This area has numerous schools, congested roads and a substantial population. It is completely wrong to pollute the air further - surely the effects of aircraft, commuting and the M25 is enough....

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Jackie Sharp,

Celia Gregory, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Please consider the health and safety issues for children and their families relating to such development of the area. Our greenbelt areas should also be protected.

brian eastwood, walton on thames

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Must protect the green belt.

Paul Abbott, Byfleet
I am fully opposed to this project. Spend some time in the area and look at the current traffic problem. This will add to the problem and add other pollution, despite claims to the contrary. NO NO NO NO!

Richard Starr, Esher

Anna McGuinness, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher
This is not really an issue of whether Cobham itself is an appropriate place for such an incinerator, as they should not be built anywhere. The idea of zero emissions is nonsense - there will be a lot of Carbon Dioxide emitted, and it will be impossible to scrub all Dioxins from the emissions too. It is really hard to understand what Elmbridge Council are thinking here, unless it is a planning ploy as suggested by another signatory.

anna craig-wood, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Paulina McGroarty, Esher

xxxxxxxx,

simon soutar, weybridge

Ingrid O\'Leary, Byfleet Surrey

xxxxxxxx, ESHER

xxxxxxxx, East Molesey

marc o\'leary, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, East Molesey
Not on my own doostep but clearly unjustified development within the precious Surrey green belt

Daniel Talenejad, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is a ridiculous idea

Mrs A Mutafyan,

xxxxxxxx, surbiton
I have 4 grandchildren living in the area

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton
Byfleet Road is normally a dangerous traffic nightmare already and relief road for the M25 when that is closed, without adding constant new large waste vehicles, and outside of any ecological concerns for the population of the area due to the nature of the proposed site.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on thames
I live very near this, there are many schools nearby, riding stables, and loads of wildlife, all to be killed because of this. Do not ruin our community for something dangerous, there are many towns, and social activities, that will soon be put to harm because of this. NO please DO NOT make this horrible device

Karen Seymour, Oxshott

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Robert Shatwell, Woking

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Green Belt, health hazard, massive congestion issues, school less than a mile away. How many more reasons do you need to realise this is not suitable land.

D.L. Wilson, Weybridge

Jeremy Bates, Oxshott

Janine Ganter, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Roz Williams, BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Wrong project at the wrong place.

Dr Anne Appleton,

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
I agree with the letter

val humphreys,

Tim Ransley,

D.Bandari, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Kim Pang, Oxshott

Catherine Fowler, Weybridge
The impact of such a development on air quality and already severe traffic congestion in the area would be horrible. This is a very built-up area and a gasification incinerator would adversely affect the quality of life of many, many locals.

W N Fowler, Weybridge
The air quality is already dangerously poor in this area. The incinerator will only make it worst.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Helen Lawry, Weybridge

Julia Lofthouse, Esher

xxxxxxxx, London

Keith Springall,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is anti-social irresponsible madness !,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Please Mr Councillor come to your senses!!

Kevin Gregory, Byfleet
Definately a NO. I want to Enjoy the wildlife and cleaner air here. There are other alternatives to Incineration.

Stuart Cole, Windlesham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames, Surrey

Julia Gilchist, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, West byfleet
Our children deserve better

Greg Downs,

Lisa Rowe,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Concerned about health issues from emission

Shlomo Dowen, Mansfield

Natalia Zenina, Weybridge
We can't believe they are going to spoil the best place in Surrey! Certainely there are a lot of places they could do it without so great harm. Just search around better!

Gwyneth Gomes, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Martin Young, Byfleet

Michelle Gomes,

Fiona Houghton, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Lower Kingswood
Unacceptable and harmful development in the green belt.

xxxxxxxx, Crawley

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Already very crowded roads leading to and from the A3 / M25, and too close to golf courses / horse riding areas.

Tatjana orlova, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Brigid Michael, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Joyce Jabamoney, Walton-on-Thames
Please consider the health issues and the impact on young children. Why the council is so keen to destroy an area of natural beauty?

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
xxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton
Absolutely wrong place. This is a green belt. Brown belt/industrial areas are obviously more appropriate. Roads not prepared for heavy traffic (HGVs).

Ian Gomes, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

Elizabeth Thompson, Byfleet

Lisa Shone, Cobham
We have 3 children and do not wish their health to be affected by breathing in toxic emissions

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
NO any gasification incinerators in our green belt area!

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Stop a new sourses of dioxins in Surrey!

Jonathan Brookes, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

Katie Weller, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Find a brown field site. Not an appropriate location at all. Traffic, health etc

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Natalie Herbert, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybride

GLORIA BOSQUE ESPALLARGAS, SURBITON

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

David Harvey, Weybridge

Elizabeth Vickery, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Planning permission was refused for a local school to expand onto a small strip of protected land. How can SCC possibly justify their actions if they go ahead and approve this application?

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

Lesley Dolphin, Byfleet

Sarah Rabett, Weybridge
This is a green belt area with many schools in the area so is not suitable for a waste incinerator.

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Elisa Everitt, Weybridge

Michael Tripp, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Naveeda Mitchell, Weybridge
This is a bit close to populated areas - there must be areas that are in the middle of farmland not used, for whatever reason where there is no housing and people living close by?

Mrs Debbie Trievnor, Weybridge
Yet another attack on Green Belt land and an unacceptable risk to public health. Just say no!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Too many risks

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone
Possibly the worst idea I have heard in a long time. Interesting to see they are building an old peoples home on the Redhilll Road - don't the old folk count any more?

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Hahahah I'd have loved to be a fly on the wall in the 30 second SCC meeting with the guy who proposed this. "We'd like to build an incinerator next to thousands of school children and among heritage sites and green belt. Now I know this may sound pretty unappealing.. BUT, wait till you hear this! It'll make all involved millions a year".

KAREN HIGGINS, Weybridge

DAVID HIGGINS, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Should be located away from any built up area, industrial site would be better and probably already have better access.

Lucy Sadler, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Waltonn on Thames

leslie burrage, Burwood Park
Protect our Green Belt and the health of our children by resiting in less populated area. The weight of extra traffic will only add to the serious congestion on local roads.
We dispair that the proposal has reached this far!!

Tom Culverwell, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
This area is congested enough and we have already had a motorway service station forced upon us. No thank you!

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, WEYBRIDGE

Steve Sampson, Cobham

Robert King, Weybridge

Kristian Eklo, Cobham

Sharron Eklo, Cobham

H Baker,

xxxxxxxx, cobham

xxxxxxxx, cobham

Diane Gray, addlestone
Make current sites more efficient. Incinuration should be last resort. Not first option!

xxxxxxxx,

Jane Chrysostomou,

xxxxxxxx, Stoke d\\'Abernon
Think of the children !

Olaf Eklo, Cobham
Not really thought trough by the politicans in relation to schools nearby, traffic in Brooklands Road and the environmental consequences.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

clive moore, weybridge

keith adams, Weybridge
No Incinerator Please

John G G Williams,

June Kay Retter, Weybridge

Tracie Sampson,

Ellen Eklo, Cobham
We have to look after our Green Belt. Please stop it!

Lindsay Bould, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
The infrastructure around this area cannot cope as it stands with the traffic problems that are already way beyond the areas capability, also Redhill Road is nearly an impossible junction at peak periods so no thought has gone into the traffic management. The effect on people and their families health could be horrendous. The argument that this is a green form of energy is yet again jumping on a band wagon of unproven going green policies (Wind turbines). If this is to go ahead as a council I hope you have enough money for the claims culture in ten - twenty years time.

sandra boutell, West Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher
There are plenty of other places to build this. It is dangerous in a heavily residential area.

Phil Golding, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, East Horsley,

xxxxxxxx, caterham

Judith Ratcliffe, Weybridge
We need to protect our Green belt and stop this and potential gravel and aggregates re-cycling plans for the weybridge area.

john Dewar, byfleet

nicola boutell, byfleet
I am opposed to this planning application

Thomas Luke Ransley, Weybridge
Keep the green belt!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Yasir Noorani, weybridge
no way , already a very heavy load of HGvs on the byfleet road , plus many other sites to built incinerator why choose a residential area.

David howell, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx,

Mrs Gay Bottrill, Byfleet
In addition to the relevant objects the increased road traffic in be unbearable and, in cases of an emergency, may well cause dangerous delays.

Earle Bottrill, Byfleet
iN ADDITION TO THE RELEVANT OBJECTIONS THE INCREASED ROAD TRAFFIC WILL CAUSE UNBEARABLE TIME WASTE AND FRUSTRATIONS AND POSSIBLY IN CASES OF AN EMERGENCY DANGEROUS AND POSSIBLY FATAL DELAYS.

jennifer parkin, byfleet
Too much traffic on our roads environmentally unfriendly and too near houses there must be somewhere where it is not so built up. The byfleet road has so much traffic it is madness to consider anymore. Are Elmbridge Borough Council being paid huge amounts of money for this because I cannot think if any other reason why they would consider this scheme.

Ian D. Maidment,

Janice Franks, WALTON-ON-THAMES
The location is completely unsuitable for such a venture - the additional traffic, both HGVs making deliveries, and from people travelling to the area will rely on small local roads, which are already under severe strain from the current traffic.

J Gorton,
Is there not enough pollution I this area from the motorways and the electricity pilons?!?!? What is going to be the impact on Wisley and painshill parks that are working so hard at conservation of plants etc

Stephen JOHN, WEYBRIDGE

Mike Paddonj, Weybridge

Louise Sandford, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, byfleet
Can't believe that this facility has to be built here - my children will be going to the school nearby.

Frank Horder, Weybridge

June Hall, Cobham
The material should be processed where produced, not moving it to green belt land with the consequential heavy lorry congestion and polution on populated minor roads.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
This type of activity cannot be classed as environmentally friendly and ought to be undertaken in an industrialised area rather than Green Belt. Additionally Byfleet Road (A245) is already overly busy with all of the trucks going to and coming from Brooklands. The added volume of traffic created by the incinerator could only exacerbate the problem.

Peter Jarvis,

Renate Heath, Weybridge

Paul Ivatts, Weybridge
I can't think of a more unsuitable site for this sort of activity, lets hope common sense prevails.

Torsten Alexander, Cobham

Dudley Heath, Weybridge
We already get lots of smoke from people burning garden rubbish because they do not want to pay for the Brown bins, which is extremely annoying on a hot summer's day when you have to shut your windows. Adding this incinerator is the final straw.

CLIVE NEWMAN, COBHAM
JUST LIKE THE DOWNSIDE M25 SERVICES - ANOTHER UNWANTED DEVELOPMENT THE AUTHORITIES ARE TRYING TO FOIST UPON US - OF NO PRACTICAL VALUE TO LOCAL RESIDENTS AND IN FACT JUST THE OPPOSITE - AN ENVIRONMENTAL NOOSE!

Martin Major, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
Unimaginable that this can be allowed so close to schools, homes and recreational facilities.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Mrs Harveen Dhillon, New Haw
I am against this incinerator.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Impact on healh, traffic and greenbelt. A project like this shows the inconsistencies with which the council treats our greenbelt.

xxxxxxxx, Surrey

Sophie Walker, Byfleet
Far to close to highly populated areas and places of beauty. The traffic is already very bad in the local area so adding to this will cause further stress on the infrastructure. I am sure there are other sites that could be utilised which would prevent less impact on the local environment and population.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Bori, Byfleet

Alan Hardman, Weybridge

Brigita Vaskelyte, Cobham

Kristina Chiganova, Cobham

Josie Precious, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Gary Street, Addlestone

Helen Russell, Weybridge
Let's not destroy the green belt and instead evaluate other options within the region. There must be other alternatives which would protect our green belt.

Samantha Wallis, WEST BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Ridiculous choice of site. Green belt must be protected.

Helen Golding,

AlanFreer, Byfleet
There is enough HGV traffic already in this area - NO MORE!!!!!!!!!!

Z Pinchbeck, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
These things are for industrial sites, not rural green belt.

Tracy Wright, cobham

Gary Jones, Byfleet
If it does go ahead, they should re open the RED HIll road entrance from the A3/M25 roundabout, thus reducing some of the traffic.

Patricia Jones, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Fetcham
Soot emitted by incomplete combustion of fossil fuel and biomass, increases the risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease.

bonnie-charlotte parker, byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I am totally disgusted that such an application can even be made and proposed to Surrey County Council. Independent research clearly shows that gassification emits toxins. There is no economic or ecological justification for such a plant on Redhill Road. It will not benefit the local economy and in fact will devastate the lives of thousands of people for years to come and will destroy communities and the flora and fauna of the Greenbelt area. Why not allow the construction of a detached house on the plot instead?

Ingrid massie, Gomshall

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

ALISON LEE, BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I am afraid this does look like the first move in a classic property development/planning scheme. Bad in itself, but with much worse future implications...

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Outrageous to propoose this in such a built up area

Simon England, Weybridge

James England, Walton on Thames

Judith Doyle, Cobham

Keith Alvey, Esher
I wish this objection the very, very best of luck.

Sonia Duggan, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Ian Woodthorpe, London

xxxxxxxx,
Clean air is clearly not a priority for this 'Green Belt'.

Did you know that the Silvermere Haven Pet Cemetary has recently erected a 6 metre additional incinerator tower without planning permission that the council have decided to 'turn a blind eye to'?

Now the incinerator a mile away.

Nothing surprises me.

Clean air and principle are clearly not a priority to the council.

In closing. Dont hold your breathe. But the likely outcome is that you will have to, the air will be so foul.

wade pollard, west byfleet
This is Green Belt and this biomass could be burnt, instead of coal, at existing power stations around the country such as Drax etc which are looking for more sources of this material

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
See "Closing of Redhill Road" from the A3 when Brooklands Commercial area was developed. Road unsuitable for heavy trucks. If we have to have these sites - why in high density areas?

Matthew Baxter, Weybridge
Cannot believe SCC is this dumb. There must be more to it, like and slightly less catastrophic option that we will agree to in order to make this one go away.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Simon connolly, West horsley

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Paul Barnes, Walton on Thames

Robert Evans, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton On Thames
I use this area all the time, shopping, golf, visiting freinds and family, etc, etc and find that it is busy enough without the threat of additional heavy goods vehicles and the impact it may have on my peace of life.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Ridiculous! The traffic on the Byfleet road is already ablsolute torture and this proposal would see more big lorries on this route. Apart from the health issues for families living locally, the idea of allowing delvelopement of green belt is outrageous.

xxxxxxxx,
Another location should be found for this. Redhill Rd/Byfleet Rd already too much traffic. Plus do not need added polution from an incinerator from an already heavily populated area.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
This is Green Belt!

xxxxxxxx, Weybrodge

Penny Hoskyn, West Byfleet
This must not be allowd. Green belt land, a populated residential area, increased traffic on already very busy roads and above all not safe with harmful emissions from vehicles and the Plant.

Claire HOath, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Mark Ashman, Cobham
The traffic congestion on the Byfleet rd already has a negative impact on those of us who live on or close to it. Approving the waste incinerator would increase large vehicle movement. The air quality is already impacted by high levels of local, A3 and M25 traffic. Why destroy more green belt, when a significant number of brown field sites exist.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Eden Hammond,

Ruth Jones, Cobham
This is a totally inappropriate development with significant detrmental impact on the surrounding areas. This is green belt andshould be protected. The traffic on this road is already very congested.

xxxxxxxx, west byfleet
Excess HGV traffic,Pollution,Greenbelt,Uneccessary, need I go on, for goodness sake engage brains Elmbridge Council and say no.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
NO NO NO!!!

Scott, Byfleet

Robin P Voice, New Malden
Using the Name Barnes Wallis is a snub to a great man. As a regular user of the Byfleet Road, thought should be given to reducing traffic not increasing it.

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead
There are far more appropriate brown field locations for this kind of installation - once the green belt is gone it's gone for good.

moira gill, Weybridge

Konstanze Graham, Cobham

Alastair Graham, Conham
The proposed plant will have a very damaging environmental and health impact on the population of Cobham and Weybridge, particularly on children. The HGVs involved in transportation to and from the plant will cause congestion even greater than at present in the Byfleet Road and emit fumes and cause vibration to houses near this road.The planning application flouts Green Belt policy.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
You cannot build this on green belt land. We cannot allow it.

Richard Knights, Byfleet

Mavis Knights, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

David Plummer, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Surely an alternative site in a less populated area would be a better solution for all

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Godalming

Sally-Jane Palmer, Surbiton
This is far too close to the school that I work at and is a major health and safety concern for us all.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
The incinerator will be a disaster for Elmbridge

Camilla Hawkins, Weybridge
No to pollution, increased traffic and environmental impact.

Jeannette Sage, ulverston
We live in an area down wind of sellafield nuclear power station. For a small area there is a very high percentage of cancers with almost every family i know having a relative die of cancer related conditions. I fully support the petition.

E Fitzpatrick, Ashford
must be stopped, could destroy a lovely course

Chris Allen, Tadworth

xxxxxxxx, london

mark hynes, godstone

Neil Baldwin, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, New Malden

Dave Gore, Addlestone

Ray Walsh, Walton-on-Thames

Guillaume Battini, Paris
Living abroad but a regular to Silvermere, the place has such an history to protect

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Graham Neale, Bisley

Simon Gill, Marlow

xxxxxxxx, Wokingham

xxxxxxxx, Guildford

d higgs, godalming

lloyd spencer, Bisley
Why do they always have to spoil things when there is other sites and options. Green belt is important to be kept.

Derek Demuth, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, East Clandon
The HGV traffic alone will add to an already congested road in the rush hour. This is totally inappropriate in this area.

xxxxxxxx, Crawley

xxxxxxxx, Dorking
Totally unsuitable site.

j pullen, surrey
Going ahead with such a site will totally ruin Silvermere golf course. Silvermere offer a place to unwind, relax and enjoy the peaceful setting around you. The clubhouse is a excellent place to eat, soaking up the atmosphere whilst enjoying the views across the lake.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Please do not let this happen. The negative effects from acidification and from noise and air pollution will be a blight on the Cobham area.

K. Carmichael, Surbiton
Please make the correct decision... It is simply ridiulous to even think that this is a good thing!!!!

xxxxxxxx, East Clandon
This is an innappropriate use of Greenbelt land.

Wendy Cady, Woking

Paul Jemetta, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Brian Street, Midhurst
we always enjoy coming to Silvermere,it would be a crime to lose all these facilities.

xxxxxxxx, west byfleet
Don't destroy our greenbelt zone anymore, this will create more air, more road and more noise pollution !! This is already a high density area with the continuing development at Brooklands.

xxxxxxxx,

Mr Clive Rainford, Storrington
I travel from Sussex, having used Silvermere for many years when I lived in Surrey, to enjoy the first class facilities and beautiful golf course and I am astounded that this application is being considered for this lovely and historic location. As I recall the lake was used by Barnes Wallace and the M.O.D during the second world war for testing of models for the bouncing bomb. Shame on you Elmbridge Council!

Miles Couchman, Teddington
This is a beautiful part of the Surrey countryside, quite apart from being one of the most enjoyable golf courses I know around London. I am appalled at the idea of this development, and strongly oppose it.

Leigh Wells, Fleet

Julie Wells, F

xxxxxxxx, Chessington
Silvermere golf course is a wonderful course as well as the surrounding area, so please leave it alone and protect it.

Sue Barr, Leatherhead

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Apart from environmental impact, traffic on Byfleet Road is often grid-locked, so this proposal is ridiculous.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Please protect our greenbelt and the tranquility around Silvermere.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

John S Porter, EPSOM

xxxxxxxx, Twickenham
Just the problem of the additional HGV traffic in the area ought to be sufficient to squash this planning application.

Mr David Warfield, Ashford
We must protect our green space

M G Bateman, Hindhead
Unbelievable!

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

dave knight, bromley

Sophia Ghaleh-Mahmoudi, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Woking

Stephen Taylor, Petworth
Good luck, we are behind you

xxxxxxxx, WestWickham

Patrick Molloy, cobham

Ray Corstin, East Clandon

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
Access by large vehicles on an already very congested road is not acceptable

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

Chris Rowell,

Jim Hains, New Malden
Not only do incinerators stink so does this decision by Elmbridge Council. Someone is benefiting and it is'nt the environment or the residents

xxxxxxxx, Tudor avenu

xxxxxxxx, Chertsey

David Jackson, Leatherhead

Steve Murphy, Croydon

xxxxxxxx, East Grinstead
This is not the right place for the incinerator and it does not sound very "green". This area is too populated for something like that.

Neil Lismorel,

xxxxxxxx, Dartford

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Has consideration been given to increased traffic on the already heavily congested Byfleet (and Seven Hills)Roads? What about the health implications for children attending schools in the surrounding areas? Have the owners of the new retirement home at the corner of Byfleet Road been consulted? Will the smoke inhalation improve the golf swing of members and visitors of St. George's Hill and Silvermere Golf Clubs???

Graham Bramhall, Downside, Cobham
We have already lost too much green belt land to the unnecessary M25 services, we can't afford to lose any more. additionally what guarantees aare there that this will not become an environmental hazard. Hans off

xxxxxxxx, Chobham
These people need to get in touch with lcoal feeling and understand that these plants are not welcome in established areas of recreation.

Bill Stone, Weybridge

Diana Isherwood Stone, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Kingston
This simply must not happen. There is already enough traffic issues in Weybridge and to add that site to the quite and clean area would be near on criminal

xxxxxxxx, Bromley

Anne S. Bjordal, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Additoional HGV traffic will cause many more delays to Byfleet Rd. which is already overloaded at times during the day. Health concerns arise from fumes.

Denise Duce, Reading

Ray Roberts, Kingston

David Williams, Wimbledon

xxxxxxxx, Camberwell

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-thames
There is a school nearby, please consider somewhere less populated.

kim buckley, crawley

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

German Yusti, Weybridge
This area is a green belt, not an industrial site, there is plenty of other places where they can establish this plan without ruining the peace, roads and environment of so many people.

Susan Rayner, Cobham
This is a totally unsuitable development for a primarily residential area and may adversely affect not only the wildlife on the golf course but surrounding nursing homes for elderly as the long term effects on health are not known.

xxxxxxxx, London

Camille Humphrey, Dorking

Gordon Frame, Windlesham
This proposed development is completely inappropriate for this location

Peter Samuel, Addlestone

Nathalie Vaughan-Smith, Cobham

Louise Goya-Perez, Weybridge

mervyn smith, cheam
This seems a ridiculous proposal to talk of green benefits when there are disgraceful consequences to an important leisure and sports facility.

ian gwyer, high wycombe

Marcia Bence, Ascot
I am disgusted that such a scheme could even be envisaged as near to a public recreation area as this is. It definitely should not be allowed to go ahead.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
The good people that built Wisley Airfield during the 2nd World War – because of its proximity to Brooklands Airfield - would turn in their graves if they knew what a blot on the beautiful Surrey landscape future greedy and selfish generations would consider building there.

At the time, Britain was united in its efforts to remain Great, and prevent the Germans from invading our green and pleasant land. Those who laboured to build the airfield would be stunned and disgusted to see their ancestors being disrespectful towards otherwise unblemished countryside.

Constructing an 80ft stack within meters of RHS Wisley Gardens - one of the most glorious and world renowned family attractions in the UK - would not only create a hideous carbuncle and eyesore, it is also likely to omit pollutants which would have a detrimental effect on the communities in the surrounding villages, and could seriously impact all the magnificent work that generations of RHS Wisley employees have laboured over to create a sustainable environment that future generations would be proud of.

Given that “sustainability” and “corporate social responsibility” are key 21st century buzzwords, I urge the developers and planning committees to be far-sighted, lead by example, and consider how proud their ancestors will be in years to come when they discover how their predecessors made the decision which preserved the charm of rural Surrey, rather than ruined it.

xxxxxxxx, Staines
D.A.Hart

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Sheer insanity combined with stupidity. Who in their own mind would design such a plant in a densely populated green belt area with thousands of school children within few miles, without mentioning the already clogged road network. Plenty of other sites. Clearly the result of some smart brainstorming from SCC. This has to be fought all the way to the national authority, further anybody resposnible for suggesting this project should be sued in a court of law...And who would ever pick a flawed design from a bankrupt design...Bad April's fool.

Caroline,

xxxxxxxx, woking
Disgusted that it is even being considred

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
We are very concerned about the proximity of the incinerator to our children's school

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Stupid place to put this thing!!!!!

Peter Dallen, Camberley

Andrew Brown, Guildford

Kevin Williams, Leatherhead
THE WRONG SITE FOR A PLANT OF THIS NATURE. IT'S GREEN BELT AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION IS BAD ENOUGH AS IT IS WITHOUT ADDING CONVOYS OF HGV'S. Elmbridge site location criteria needs re examination.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Anthony Lines, Walton-on-Thames
This will be a blight on a beautiful historic site.

xxxxxxxx, WIMBLEDON

peter michael munday, reigate
Silvermere is a beautiful golf course and would be badly affected by the proposed development and I therfore strongly object to it!!!

Nigel Paul, West Molesey

xxxxxxxx, kingston

Ingrid Monteyne, Guildford
Harmfull to green belt
Disaster to the local environment

xxxxxxxx, West Horsley

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet, Surrey
The Elmbridge area already has a high rate of asthma sufferers, including myself and other young members of my family who live in Byfleet, this will just add to pollution levels.

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
There are many schools in the vicinity of the proposed depot, (including our grandchildren's) why do we want to subject them to yet more pollution, we already have the M25 and heathrow on our doorstep.

Conie Mascarenhas, Middlesex

John Rennocks, Oxshott
The traffic in the vicinity of this proposed scheme is already horrendous for much of the day,NAND his will make it far worse by adding many heavy goods vehicles.

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead
Dont spoil the greenbelt

xxxxxxxx, London
Unbelievable, what are you thinking? The golf course will be ruined.

Shaun Schmidt, Weybridge

Brian Crook, West Byfleet
Ruin a natural site

Sally McAlister, Watford

Rachel Golding, Hersham

Gil Ben-Ari, Coulsdon
We have family in the area, including a baby grand-daughter now nearly eight months old. The pollution to the air will be unacceptable and will be carried by the wind to the surrounding area. We do not want our family subject to these air pollutants

xxxxxxxx, Horsham
A poorly thought through plan and the wrong location , we must protect greenbelt land from these type of developments

Frank Hanafin, Weybridge
This road is already grid locked every morning and evening, ridiculous idea, absolutely not!

Alan Fletcher, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This is greenbelt land. Use a more appropriate location. There are plenty of ex-MOD and brown field sites that can be used instead.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Gary Randall, byfleet
It is not a case of "not on my doorstep" but more a case of why ruin a beautiful greenbelt area.

Charles Dukes, Godalming

nikki Greig, sutton

Tony Mundy, New Haw

xxxxxxxx,

SIMON MOUNT, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Too many movements on a road that is already having a care home built right on the corner which in itself is going to cause traffic problems with movements onto a very busy road

xxxxxxxx, Hampton

A.Matthews, Petersfield

xxxxxxxx, Fleet

Maire Colohan,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Richard Hall, Addlestone
Why spoil a pleasant environment which gives exercise and pleasure to thousands of people every year. Redhill Road together with the junction with Byfleet Road is not designed for the large number of lorries which will be required to service this site.

xxxxxxxx, Epsom
There are pently of other sites where the incinerator could be located. There is no need to put it so close to many leisure facilities.

xxxxxxxx, Epsom

Brian Taylor, Woking, Surrey
This plan is a disgrace and needs thinking through more. Find somewhere in an industrialised area please.

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead

Mr.R.G.Pulley, Fleet
Do not want it wind will blow ashes all over the golf course and ruin all the greens.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
Consider the environment¬

xxxxxxxx, Woking

Alistair Whittle, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Redhill Road was closed to access from the A3 slip road some years ago presumably for traffic reasons but these proposal will cause serious problems on an already congested Byfleet Road.
The Area is Green Belt with several public footpaths crossing the area
There is conflicting research as to the safety of this operation which would make a decision to proceed dubious

Jonathan king, West byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
How exactly was this planning given? What was the nature of the lobbying? Who will be left with the clean-up bill or worse if the business fails and the developers walk away? Not convinced by the safety arguments - we do not know about the long term health effects, particularly for children. I think there is a school close by and certainly lots of families use Silvermere. How will the already congested road infrastructure cope with inevitable increase in LGVs. It would be nice if the Council for once listened to local objections, that is the point of elections and democracy.

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

JOHN SALLIS, Woodham. Addlestone
There must be a less damaging location for such a development than this. A site already used for refuse would be good

xxxxxxxx, Worcester Park

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I am extremely concerned about the health risks to my family, especially my two young children.

Emily Kidd, Pyrford

xxxxxxxx, east molesey

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Phillip Korn, Stanmore

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Not here, it's a beautiful location, there are plenty of not so naturally lovely areas such as Woking where this could be sited instead!

lee stapleton, london

xxxxxxxx, London
How many more preposterous proposals will 'planners' allow ?????

Adi Screwvala, Byfleet
This is an inappropriate development at this site which will encroach on valueable greenbelt and increase traffic on surrouding roads which are already unacceptably congested at peak times.

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames
a disgrace its got this far.

John Dabill, Guildford
This proposal simply cannot go ahead in such an area. The traffic this would cause on such small and already crowded roads. The pollution caused by the incinerator and the visual aspects of the design. How can the incompetent leaders on Surrey County Council have allowed it to get this far!! I am tired that we who live in Surrey continually have to fight these sort of insane proposals.

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
Most stupid idea of the year so far!

Vanessa Davis, walton on thames
Please stop this

Lawrence Redding, yateley
why spoil a loveley golf course

Barrie Parker, Claygate

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, ewell
please consider the golf course evn my children play there

Donna Smith, Cobham

Adam Lungley, Carshalton
This is not right, no only for the beautiful country side but also for the wildlife present in the area.

Steve Dawes, Leatherhead
We need to address the total long term commercial and environment impact of such projects before ticking the short term green energy targets.Where politics and science divide...... Nonsense and short sighted....

Wendy Pfeiffer, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, London
do not live in area but a frequent visitor to Silvermere Golf Course

xxxxxxxx, New Haw, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

Mr J Pollock, Cobham
Not a good idea...

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

xxxxxxxx, London
I will absolutely say NO for the incinerator plant. Please protect GREEN belt.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Mary Bond, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, Bracknell

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Building this in a heavily populated area where traffic congestion is already a major problem is madness. There are plenty of sites with easier access, away from densely residential areas. Very unhappy at the prospect of increased traffic pollution, let alone the pollution from the incinerator itself.

Paul Gowers, Guildford

xxxxxxxx, Woking

d cosh, walton on thames
this is a mad place to build this near old folks home a school and recreation land

xxxxxxxx, woodham
Traffic in area is alreday unacceptable and enviornmental impact over a heavily populated areas and green belt needs to be reviewed

xxxxxxxx, London
It would be such a pity to see the beauty of Silvermere and its surrounding areas blighted by effects of industry. It would seem to me that there are alternative locations away from an area many people use as easy access to enjoy nature and quiet time.

Sarah Blackman, Godalming

xxxxxxxx, Gt Bookham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Tony Ahmet, Carshalton
This would not only be a disaster for Silvermere Golf but for all local residents.

David Parsons, Weybridge
Who are the ridiculous prople who draw up such schemes for an area of outstanding beauty? I imagine they do not live locally so it is either crass stupidity or envy.

xxxxxxxx, Kingston

xxxxxxxx, London
A wonderful public golfing facility which should not be sabotaged in such a way. This is purely from the stance of the golf club, let alone the adverse traffic effect it will have on a beautiful area of Surrey.

Mark Rust, Bracknell
i love silvermere its a heavenly place, to build a waste incinerator is a disaster it musn't happen

Mrs Susan Chapple, Weybridge
This incinerator would be a major health hazard to this area

xxxxxxxx, Woking

u rohtlaan, walton-on-thames
Why spoil peoples leasure time

xxxxxxxx, Woking
Golf should not be played next to any noise making facilities. it should be a peaceful area for relaxation and enjoyment. this proposal is set to ruin that which in turn will lead to a decrease in golf at Silvermere, in turn possible leading to job losses.

Chris Yates, Cobham

xxxxxxxx,

Andrew Barrowman, Claygate, Esher
Awful idea!

Sarah Paterson, Byfleet

Jane Newell, Woking

xxxxxxxx, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Laleham
This area of greenbelt must be protected. Do not let this development take place

xxxxxxxx, Caterham

xxxxxxxx, Effingham

Ian Tozer, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Dorking

Kevin Chamberlain, Crowthorne

xxxxxxxx, walton-on-thames
please no incinerator

Michael Lee, Guildford
Outrageous!Beautiful site.Totally wrong site for incinerator

xxxxxxxx, Hampton

xxxxxxxx, Teddington

xxxxxxxx, Chertsey

Colin Barwick, West Molesey
Dont ignore this petition like you did in Anne Way, West Molesey

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Peter Davies, London

Ann Nicholls, Frimley

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Ralph Sutton, North End House
This project will destroy a green belt area of natural beauty with respect to air quality, traffic and noise.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

a mackenzie, london

xxxxxxxx, Shepperton
Investigation into a similar development in Charlton village (near Shepperton) has proved that these incinerators are far from green. Do SCC or Government care? Clearly not. If you value your green areas and health object. You can only defeat this by active campaign and weight of numbers petitioning. Mad positioning in what is already a dense traffic area.

Ruth Quinn, Esher

mick gordon, epsom
the surrounding roads already struggles with the volume of traffic without adding so much more HGV vehicles.

Robin Byers, London
This is a monstrous disregard for the health & safety of a sizeable population of human beings not rabbits including children. The effect upon local house prices will impact heavily.This site has clearly been chosen for its convenience for the HGV's etc further exacerbating the traffic on a relatively busy road WITH COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR USERS & LOCAL INHABITANTS. Gases & smells will inevitably escape and don't believe the project engineers.

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

KARE N CROMPTON, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This area is not suitable for the incinerator because there are so many childrens living within affected area. This is not a concern about a health issue but also a promised green belt in this area.

John Cook, Ascot

xxxxxxxx, Haywards Heath
I work in Leatherhead & regularly visit Silvermere & am stunned at the thought this development could even be considered on such a beautiful site, the roads are busy enough around the area, find an industrial site to build this!

xxxxxxxx, Chertsey

Samantha Burgess, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, New Malden

Jane Fox, Caterham
Protect the green belt!

xxxxxxxx, Ripley

Elliot Kutner, Redhill

Jim Tuck, Walton on Thames
I believe that green space should be protected from this kind of development and that the enjoyment of Silvermere users such as myself would be significantly reduced due to noise pollution and reduced air quality. In addition, egress from Redhill Road on to the A245 is already a difficult process and the addition of numerous heavy and slow moving vehicles will undoubtedly cause more accidents and increase congestion.

xxxxxxxx, Feltham
I play golf at Silvermere regularly and if this is built i will have to seriously consider playing there again.

Charlie Vaughan-Griffith,
Poorly thought out. protect the greenbelt - there must be more suitable industrial sites over the UK. Common sense please.

xxxxxxxx, Egham

Corinne, Cobham

A. Simonyan, Hersham
This must be a terrible joke, a pollution disaster in the centre of natural beauty? Of course we say - NO! Think about the health of our children - PLEASE!

richard stevens, cobham

xxxxxxxx, Southwood, Farnborough
This plan needs to be reconsidered, especially as Silvermere promotws wildlife within it's grounds. This area is classed as greenbelt and needs to remain as greenbelt

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Completely the wrong location for an incinerator. Think about the impact on the countryside, animals and people.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I moved out of central London to give my young family a better, healthier quality of life. This proposal has not been well thought out - in no way is a "green" option when you take into account increased air pollution, traffic and noise pollution...setting aside the obvious eyesore. This must not go ahead.

Christina Zandona, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

Dave Hughes, Guildford

Neil Brown, Byfleet

Petra Langen-Pieters, Addlestone

k hicks, surbiton
As a member of staff at silvermere ec i strongly object to the incineration plant due to health & safety issues and its innappropriate placement on the greenbelt.

t j hicks, surbiton
I Strongly object to the gasification plant asi travel to silvermere as a leisure pursuit to enjoy the peace and fresh air of greenbelt land

Sarah Connor, Weybridge

Phil Shaz, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

simon white, Godalming
Would ruin a lovely habitat and the infrastructure locally simply isn't up to it.

John Newman, whitton

xxxxxxxx, Leatherhead

Joanne Whitaker, Guildford

Cecilia Rappe, Weybridge

V Austin, Cobham

A . Hyde, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

mark james, sutton

dean currie, surbiton

David Watson, Amersham
This is beautiful woodland that should not be polluted in this way. As a visting golfer, I have had many enjoyable days at Silvermere and I'm appalled that this application can be considered. It must be stopped!

paul fowler, camberley

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Hayley Oxborough, Hersham

Louise long, Tadworth

Gordon Brierley, Woking
Totally inappropriate and ill-conceived, especially as another incinerator is planned for the former Wisley Airfield site less than a couple of miles away.

Francine Sheridan, london

xxxxxxxx, Bookham
Protect this green and open space from such an unwarranted and ill advised plan

Andrew Hartley, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Paul Whitney, Catford
Will ruin my great days at Silvermere and friends local environments. I jhave seen what the one in Central London has done. Not to mention the wildlife and Greenbelt itself!

John Moss,

xxxxxxxx, Aldershot

Irfan Ahmed, weybridge
Unbelieveable, it is going to traffic chaos, unsightly, more air pollution whether it is through traffic or the incinerator.

chrissie twigg-stewart, weybridge
Vehemently opposed.

xxxxxxxx, chertsey

M richardson, East Horsley
We object to the HGV traffic above all else. ONLY if the exit to Redhill Road from the M25 was opened would this be acceptable - NOT from the Brooklands/Cobham road

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Streatham
This does not appear to be the right location, the spread of exhaust pollution over the golf course would be detrimental.

xxxxxxxx, COBHAM
I am against this incinerator.
Here are my reasons :

A) National Green Belt policy statement
Source :
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/155499.pdf

1. para 2.1 “that Green Belt characteristics is their permanence and their protection must be maintained as far as can be seen ahead”.
2. Para 3.15 goes on to state “the visual amenities of the Green Belt should not be injured by proposals for development within or conspicuous from the Green Belt…(which)…might be visually detrimental by reason of their siting….”.
3. Para 3.2 states “inappropriate development is, by definition harmful to the Green Belt and it is for the applicant to show why permission should be granted”.
4. Para 3.4 states “construction of new buildings inside a Green Belt is inappropriate unless for certain specific types of developments (listed).” …This does NOT include incinerators!

B) Planning for sustainable waste management
Source :
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/1876202.pdf

See page 19/28
"Ensuring a Strong, Healthy and Just Society.
Meeting the diverse needs of all people in existing and future communities, promoting personal wellbeing, social cohesion and inclusion, and creating equal opportunity for all."

Roger Keay, Thorpe Bay
Build it somewhere else

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Rod Mac Donald, Camberley

Toby Foreman, West Byfleet
Please protect our Greenbelt

Liz Gardner, Claygate

xxxxxxxx, Cobham Surrey

xxxxxxxx, Claygate

xxxxxxxx, Kingston
The impact on health, saftey, local road infrastructure and wildlife has not been taken into full consideration with this planning application. The power station must not go ahead!

Mike Turner, Weybridge

D Maidment, Walton-on-Thames

Duncan Wyeth, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Kekoo Sethna, Weybridge
Please do not build incenerators on green belt land. As it is the area is over crowded and we have huge traffic problems.

Denise Jones,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

sarah palmer, weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Hamish Mitchell, Bodmin
This is why we moved to Cornwall and clean air!

emma donald, puttenham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Debbie Conibere, Weybridge
Local School, Local Traffic and Local People would all be affected if this went ahead. Keep our Green Belt green!

Debbie Cain, weybridge

Charles Beresford, Weybridge
As a resident in the area and suffering from lung problems I am extremely concerned about this potential health hazard both for me and my family.Also the major disruption to traffic flow is unacceptable,we already have too many Tesco lorries cloging the area, its got to stop.

Louise Beresford, Weybridge
I am totally against this proposal due the harm it will cause to my husbands health who has a lung condition.

Katherine Sutcliffe, New Haw Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Woking

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
Not the right place for this project - far too built up.

Kevin Overton, Weybridge

Natalie Overton, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Obviously Green Belt doesn't mean anything these days, especially to Elmbridge Council!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This may be a brown field ex industrial site, but it is so close to local amenities (Schools,golf club, equestrian centre. Wisly Gardens and hotel) and the site of a new, large, senior citizens home, that it should not be considered as an appropriate location for a busy, noisy operation such as this. There must be more suitable brown field sites in the locality that are closer to the main trunk roads, that do not require the encroachment on already overworked local roads that this plan entails.

samantha court, addlestone

Audrey Evans, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, cobham

John Leheup, East Horsley

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
No thank you......!!!!!!!!

Richard Mulhall, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
WRONG PROJECT, WRONG PLACE; TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE; THINK AGAIN.......

xxxxxxxx, London

Sarah Pinsent, Shepperton

melanie farmer, byfleet

Michelle Thomas, Chertsey

Allison Haffenden, Byfleet
This area is already polluted with the M25 so close, and we don't need more lorries causing problems!!

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Andrew O\'Neill, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Dorking
Please protect this Green Belt.

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Slough

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

Michael Edginton, Weybridge
This is completely inappropriate!

James Girling-Budd, Cobham
Why is green belt land being abused when brown field sites are available

B. Newman, Byfleet
I am totally aginst this incinerator and find it unbelievable that Elmbridge borough council would even consider this application.

Becky Lewis, Weybridge

Dale Coskery, Oxshott
Inappropriate and dangerous in an urban neighbourhood

DONALD LEGGET, WEYBRIDGE
I have read the extremely detailed letter. I agree with all the points made. What worried me most is that one of the paries is in the processs of going bust.. Mt brother used to live in Foxholm and I know this site wekk. It is an attempt by the developers to make a fast buck out of what is a useless site,

xxxxxxxx, weybridge
extremely disappointing that the councils (elmbridge and surrey) have not communicated anything about this to residents. thanks to those who have highlighted this in advertisements and by word of mouth.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Brian Millard, Bookham
As a user of Silvermere Golf Course I am horrified at the prospect of this Biomass Gasification incinerator being built nearby

Michelle Sweet, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, byfleet

David Ross, Shepperton
Protect the green belt, there are plenty of other undeveloped areas to build this thing

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Fran Reed, Cobham

Rich Reed, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

Brenda Chamberlain, Leatherhead

MR Simpson, Richmond
Green should mean Green

Peter Cummins, Walton
Unbelievable that an incinator power station can be contemplated inside the M25, still less in this particular spot. Surrey Council, you know what to do!

Umang Patel, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, New haw

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Protecting the environment

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Hersham

Pam Crellin, Addlestone

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This can only only have a negative effect on our environment - most importantly health, traffic congestion (already bad) and wildlife - especially the bird population which is only just recovering in the area.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This is an entirely unsuitable site for this purpose and a traffic blackspot. It needs to be relocated to a more suitable location

xxxxxxxx, Esher
Totally unacceptable for the area

Rogermeek, Esher
Level of pollution in green belt area not acceptable also increased traffic will cause congestion and road safety issues

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Too close to our home and way too close for our local schools. We should also consider the devaluation of local properties by having the incinerator close by. Ask if they are prepared to pay the incremental difference to EVERY home owner in the area. Do not let this happen!!

r reed,

David Ramage, Chobham Woking
This cannot be allowed to go ahead. It will have a serious detrimental impact to all surrounding areas. Stop the planning now.

lesley Corrie, Cobham

Martin Cave, Grays, Essex

Tove Lind, Esher
I strongly oppose the building of a wasteincinerator this close to Silvermere golf club and the green belt area. The fumes and airpollution

xxxxxxxx,

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
What a ridiculous choice of location in such a densely populated area with access that is already bottlenecked.

xxxxxxxx, weybridge

Anne Gregory, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
Surely there's a better place for it!

xxxxxxxx, Walton On Thames
Totally ridiculous, the area is densely populated and needs no more pollution risk to people or wildflife and the local roads are fit to burst at the best of times let alone where there are issues on the M25 and/or A3.

sam, Kingston
I am moving to Weybridge, I'm moving away from Kingtson to get away from pollution, not closer to it

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
I am shocked that this is even being considered by the local council and shows how out of touch with locals/residents they really are.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Surrey

Vicki Gibb, Byfleet

Warren Gibb, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Addlestone

Andy Park, W O T

brad gibb, byfleet
its to close to houses and byfleet village

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, walton on thames

Victoria wild, Esher

Richard Bartlett, Weybridge
This is not good news for the local area. Apart from the environmental issues, the added traffic along the already far to busy A245 (Byfleet Road) will make it a nightmare.

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

Melanie Heath, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, wey road

Andy Sharp, Weybridge
Just not suitable for this area

douglas smith, cobham
please do not build

Justin Evans, Horley

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
I am especially concerned about the impact on golfers, users of Silvermere and people who walk their dogs in the woods nearby

xxxxxxxx, Byfleeet

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
Why here and not other brown sites that are available. The reason we live here is to be able to enjoy the green belt area and the ability to allow our children the opportunity to be outside in fresh air. There are also enough trucks clogging up the inadequate road system around Byfleet and Weybridge - more trucks would just make this impossible.

xxxxxxxx, Old WOking

Andrew Gulliford, Cobham

bradley, byfleet
no no no !

D J L Crowley, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
This is terrible

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton
Huge campaigns encouraging us to reduce our carbon footprint and the adverse effect we're having on the planet and yet this is being considered?!

Kate Brenner, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I strongly oppose the building of the proposed incinerator. This area is simply too highly populated and we will all suffer from the increased traffic and pollution.

David Gibb, Tolworth
We're moving to the area and don't want the health and traffic hazards!

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I strongly object to this incinarator. We do not need it. The pollution and increased congestion are important negative uses.

Chris Davies, Torquay
There must be an alternative, and either way there needs to be full PUBLIC CONSULTATION.

xxxxxxxx, West Byfleet
What an appalling idea, how much more can a community take in a beautiful build up area.

Trevor Robinson, Weybridge
Inadequate roads to cope with existing traffic. Potential accident risk/closeness to National Grid power lines, loss of green belt and loss of amenity to the community. NO to this

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Fetcham
This would be a disaster, not just on an environmental level, but to add to the already congested and often gridlocked road system surrounding the propsed site shows that no-one in any planning capacity has actualy experienced using the roads at peak and off-peak times.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Inappropriate development in the wrong place

Lisa Threlfall, Cobham
We pay the taxes. Listen to the people who DO NOT want this polluting Incinerator to be built......

xxxxxxxx, Webridge

HELEN GRIGGS, WEYBRIDGE

xxxxxxxx, Hersham
A more suitable site, further away from schools and residential areas should be sourced. We should all fight to protect our green belt.

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames
Dominic Raab, MP for Esher and Walton says that protecting the greenbelt is on his top 3 priorities... time to show it!

Robert Hayden, Weybridge
I'm generally open minded about new technology and development since we have new problems to solve but I'm very concerned about the potential for pollutants in an extremely densely populated part of the country, as well as the impact on water supplies used for cooling. I don't see that this proposal brings any benefit to the people who live in this area so why should it go ahead, and the safety evidence seems as yet unproven.

xxxxxxxx, Surbiton

xxxxxxxx, WEST BYFLEET

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

R Martin, Walton

Richard Attwood-Smith, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
This is a residential area and not an industrial site.

Suella Ritchie, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, shepperton
Seriously concern regarding children at school less than 1 mile away & protection of the local environment in this Green Belt

Paul McGuire, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
Greenbelt land should not be used for such purposes. Such risks should not be taken with the health of our children.

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

Nicholas Orr, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
I strongly oppose this planning.

xxxxxxxx, New Haw

xxxxxxxx, SURREY

xxxxxxxx, Pyrford

Miss Bella, Walton On Thames

Mr Laszlo, Walton On Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, molesey

rebecca scorer,

xxxxxxxx, East Molesey, Surrey

Harvey Elliott, Weybridge

D Mackinnon, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Nicholas Kjelgaard, Byfleet

Joanna Kjelgaard, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Do not kill our children

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge
To put something with such disastrous health risks is outrageous and we owe it to our children to make sure that it does not happen.

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Hersham

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, cobham

Paul Bruton, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet
So much for transparency! I would just like to reiterate everything that has been said: health consequences, traffic chaos, an eyesore, on Green Belt land etc. There is surely somewhere more appropriate for an incinerator. It's certainly not here. The Green Belt is there for a reason, not to be utilized at the whim of SCC.

xxxxxxxx, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, claygate

Frank van Ekeren, Oxshott

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Tamarin Goldsmith, Cobham

xxxxxxxx, Esher

John Ebdon,

Jo Barlow, Long Ditton

xxxxxxxx, Walton-on-Thames

xxxxxxxx, Esher

Brian Smith, Byfleet

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Cobham
Why in a populated area? There are certainly many other safer options

Sarah Ferguson, Walton-on-Thames

Ben Ferguson, Walton-on-Thames

Mrs Bowen, Esher
No thank you! Green belt must be protected. Serious lack of consideration.

Suzanne Azar, Kingston

Tracey Whicker, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Walton on thames
This project will polute a large area where many people live and visit. As an asthma sufferer I am very worried about it.

xxxxxxxx, Claygate
I am a father of two young children, both of whom attend School locally and live within the area to be impacted which are located very close proximity to the proposed site of the Incinerator.

The reasons for my objection to the above planning permission are:

1. The detrimental effect on children's health.

2. Building on Green Belt, which would not be in accordance with the Law.

3. Environmental impact
- the site is currently a haven for wildlife
- there would be increased light and noise pollution

4. Overcrowding and danger from very large lorries making deliveries.

5. Negative impact on cyclists, ramblers, riders and golfers.

6. The presence of an incinerator would be completely unsuitable in an area of natural beauty.

xxxxxxxx, Stoke d\\'Abernon

xxxxxxxx, Esher

xxxxxxxx, Oxshott

Nuala Kearney, Esher

Ross Taylor, esher

xxxxxxxx, Weybridge

xxxxxxxx, Esher
don't do it for our children!

xxxxxxxx, Walton on Thames
This is simply awful and simply CANNOT happen, lorries, traffic most importantly polution!!

Stephen Scott, walton-on-thames
Fundamentally the wrong location for such a project. The roas is busy enough, sports facilities and schools would be effected and further green belt area in the Elmbridge region destroyed.

Lance Drake, Stoke D\\'Abernon

Julie Mellish, Walton on Thames
The proposals will be a disaster

xxxxxxxx, Cobham

Katie Cooper, Esher